Results 1 
2 of
2
Interpreting the Quantum
, 1997
"... This paper is a commentary on the foundational significance of the CliftonBubHalvorson theorem characterizing quantum theory in terms of three informationtheoretic constraints. I argue that: (1) a quantum theory is best understood as a theory about the possibilities and impossibilities of informa ..."
Abstract

Cited by 16 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
This paper is a commentary on the foundational significance of the CliftonBubHalvorson theorem characterizing quantum theory in terms of three informationtheoretic constraints. I argue that: (1) a quantum theory is best understood as a theory about the possibilities and impossibilities of information transfer, as opposed to a theory about the mechanics of nonclassical waves or particles, (2) given the informationtheoretic constraints, any mechanical theory of quantum phenomena that includes an account of the measuring instruments that reveal these phenomena must be empirically equivalent to a quantum theory, and (3) assuming the informationtheoretic constraints are in fact satisfied in our world, no mechanical theory of quantum phenomena that includes an account of measurement interactions can be acceptable, and the appropriate aim of physics at the fundamental level then becomes the representation and manipulation of information.
unknown title
"... The great debate between Einstein and Bohr on the interpretation of quantum mechanics culminated with the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen (EPR) paper in 1935, ‘‘Can quantummechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?’’ (Einstein, Podolsky, & Rosen, 1935, and Bohr’s reply, 1935). EPR ..."
Abstract
 Add to MetaCart
The great debate between Einstein and Bohr on the interpretation of quantum mechanics culminated with the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen (EPR) paper in 1935, ‘‘Can quantummechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?’’ (Einstein, Podolsky, & Rosen, 1935, and Bohr’s reply, 1935). EPR showed that