A unified quantitative approach to modeling subjects ' identification and categorization of multidimensional perceptual stimuli is proposed and tested. Two subjects identified and categorized the same set of perceptually confusable stimuli varying on separable dimensions. The identification data were modeled using Sbepard's (1957) multidimensional scaling-choice framework. This framework was then extended to model the subjects ' categorization performance. The categorization model, which generalizes the context theory of classification developed by Medin and Schaffer (1978), assumes that subjects store category exemplars in memory. Classification decisions are based on the similarity of stimuli to the stored exemplars. It is assumed that the same multidimensional perceptual representation underlies performance in both the identification and Categorization paradigms. However, because of the influence of selective attention, similarity relationships change systematically across the two paradigms. Some support was gained for the hypothesis that subjects distribute attention among component dimensions so as to optimize categorization performance. Evidence was also obtained that subjects may have augmented their category representations with inferred exemplars. Implications of the results for theories of multidimensional scaling and categorization are discussed.

Abstract not found

The relationship between subjects ' identification and categorization learning of integral-dimension stimuli was studied within the framework of an exemplar-based generalization model. The model was used to predict subjects ' learning in six different categorization conditions on the basis of data obtained in a single identification learning condition. A crucial assumption in the model is that because of selective attention to component dimensions, similarity relations may change in systematic ways across different experimental contexts. The theoretical analysis provided evidence that, at least under unspeeded conditions, selective attention may play a critical role in determining the identification-categorization relationship for integral stimuli. Evidence was also provided that similarity among exemplars decreased as a function of identification learning. Various alternative classification models, including prototype, multiple-prototype, average distance, and "value-on-dimensions" models, were unable to account for the results. This article seeks to characterize performance relations between the two fundamental classification paradigms of identification and categorization. Whereas in an identification paradigm people identify stimuli as unique items (a one-to-one

In this article, the relation between the identification, similarity judgment, and categorization of multidimensional perceptual stimuli is studied. The theoretical analysis focused on general recognition theory (GRT), which is a multidimensional generalization of signal detection theory. In one application, 2 Ss first identified a set of confusable stimuli and then made judgments of their pairwise similarity. The second application was to Nosofsky's (1985b, 1986) identificationcategorization experiment. In both applications, a GRT model accounted for the identification data better than Luce's (1963) biased-cboice model. The identification results were then used to predict performance in the similarity judgment and categorization conditions. The GRT identification model accurately predicted the similarity judgments under the assumption that Ks allocated attention to the 2 stimulus dimensions differently in the 2 tasks. The categorization data were predicted successfully without appealing to the notion of selective attention. Instead, a simpler GRT model that emphasized the different decision rules used in identification and categorization was adequate. The perceptual processes involved when subjects identify, categorize, or judge the pairwise similarity of multidimensional perceptual stimuli are closely related (e.g., Ashby &

Visual objects are perceived correctly only if their features are identified and then bound together. Illusory conjunctions result when feature identification is correct but an error occurs during feature binding. A new model is proposed that assumes feature binding errors occur because of uncertainty about the location of visual features. This model accounted for data from 2 new experiments better than a model derived from A. M. Treisman and H. Schmidt's (1982) feature integration theory. The traditional method for detecting the occurrence of true illusory conjunctions is shown to be fundamentally flawed. A reexamination of 2 previous studies provided new insights into the role of attention and location information in object perception and a reinterpretation of the deficits in patients who exhibit attentional disorders. A description of visual object identification in terms of register-ing visual stimulus features has a long history (see Boring, 1950). This description of identification is implicit in many popular models, including the pandemonium model of Selfridge (1959), the recognition-by-components model of Biederman (1987), and models based on spatial frequency analysis (e.g., DeValois & De-

related to a variety of likelihood-based models. In particular, it is shown that: (1) for category distributions defined over independent dimensions, general versions of the context model and Estes ’ (1986) similarity-likelihood model are formally identical; (2) the context model and similarity choice model can be given interpretations as exemplar-based likelihood models; (3) an independent feature addition-deletion model is a special case of the similarity choice model; and (4) a perception/likelihood-based decision model of identilication generates predictions that are characterizable by the similarity choice model. 0 1990 Academic Press. Inc. Two main classes of models that have been formulated to provide quantitative predictions of categorization performance are “exemplar-similarity ” models and “feature-probability ” or “likelihood ” models (e.g., Ashby & Perrin, 1988; Estes,

Further tests of an exemplar-similarity approach