Abstract not found

Work in philosophy and psychology has argued for a dissociation between perceptuallybased similarity and higher-level rules in conceptual thought. Although such a dissociation may be justified at times, our goal is to illustrate ways in which conceptual processing is grounded in perception, both for perceptual similarity and abstract rules. We discuss the advantages, power and influences of perceptually-based representations. First, many of the properties associated with amodal symbol systems can be achieved with perceptually-based systems as well (e.g. productivity). Second, relatively raw perceptual representations are powerful because they can implicitly represent properties in an analog fashion. Third, perception naturally provides impressions of overall similarity, exactly the type of similarity useful for establishing many common categories. Fourth, perceptual similarity is not static but becomes tuned over time to conceptual demands. Fifth, the original motivation or basis for sophisticated cognition is often less sophisticated perceptual similarity. Sixth, perceptual simulation occurs even in conceptual tasks that have no explicit perceptual demands. Parallels between perceptual and conceptual processes suggest that many mechanisms typically associated

This paper has two objectives. First, we will argue that the mutability of conceptual fea- tures can be represented as a single, multiple-valued dimension. We will show that the fea- tures of a concept can be reliably ordered with respect to the degree to which people are willing to transform the feature while retaining the integrity of a representation; i.e., that a number of conceptual tasks, all of which require people to transform conceptual features, produce similar orderings. Following Medin and Shoben (1988), these tasks have in common that they ask people to consider an object that is missing a feature but is otherwise intact (e.g., a real chair without a seat)

The authors examined cultural preferences for formal versus intuitive reasoning among East Asian (Chinese and Korean), Asian American, and European American university students. We investigated categorization (Studies 1 and 2), conceptual structure (Study 3), and deductive reasoning (Studies 3 and 4). In each study a cognitive conflict was activated between formal and intuitive strategies of reasoning. European Americans, more than Chinese and Koreans, set aside intuition in favor of formal reasoning. Conversely, Chinese and Koreans relied on intuitive strategies more than European Americans. Asian Americans' reasoning was either identical to that of European Americans, or intermediate. Differences emerged against a background of similar reasoning tendencies across cultures in the absence of conflict between formal and intuitive strategies.

The difference between integral and separable interaction of dimensions is a classic problem in cognitive psychology (Garner, 1970; Shepard, 1964) and remains an essential component of most current experimental and theoretical analyses of category learning (e.g. Ashby & Maddox, 1994; Goldstone, 1994; Kruschke, 1993; Melara, Marks & Potts, 1993; Nosofsky, 1992). So far the problem has been addressed through post-hoc analysis in which empirical evidence of integral and separable processing is used to fit human data, showing how the impact of a pair of dimensions interacting in an integral or a separable manner enters into later learning processes. In this paper, we argue that a mechanistic connectionist explanation for variations in dimensional interactions can provide a new perspective through exploration of how similarities between stimuli are transformed from physical to psychological space when learning to identify, discriminate, and categorize them. We substantiate this claim by demonstrating how even a standard backpropagation network combined with a simple image-processing Gabor filter component provides limited but clear potential to process monochromatic stimuli that are composed of integral pairs of dimensions differently from monochromatic stimuli that are composed of separable pairs of dimensions. Interestingly, the responses from Gabor filters are shown to already capture most of the dimensional interaction, which in turn can be operated upon by the neural network during a given learning task. In addition, we introduce a basic attention mechanism to backpropagation that gives it the ability to selectively attend to relevant dimensions and illustrate how this serves the model in solving a filtration vs. condensation task (Kruschke, 1993). The model may serve a...

effect of time pressure and the spatial integration of the stimulus dimensions on overall similarity categorization.