Results 1 - 10
of
52
The Complexity of First-order and Monadic Second-order Logic Revisited
- Annals of Pure and Applied Logic
, 2002
"... The model-checking problem for a logic L on a class C of structures asks whether a given L-sentence holds in a given structure in C. In this paper, we give super-exponential lower bounds for fixed-parameter tractable model-checking problems for first-order and monadic second-order logic. We show tha ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 44 (6 self)
- Add to MetaCart
The model-checking problem for a logic L on a class C of structures asks whether a given L-sentence holds in a given structure in C. In this paper, we give super-exponential lower bounds for fixed-parameter tractable model-checking problems for first-order and monadic second-order logic. We show that unless PTIME = NP, the model-checking problem for monadic second-order logic on finite words is not solvable in time f(k) · p(n), for any elementary function f and any polynomial p. Here k denotes the size of the input sentence and n the size of the input word. We prove the same result for first-order logic under a stronger complexity theoretic assumption from parameterized complexity theory. Furthermore, we prove that the model-checking problems for first-order logic on structures of degree 2 and of bounded degree d ≥ 3 are not solvable in time 2 2o(k) · p(n) (for degree 2) and 2 22o(k) · p(n) (for degree d), for any polynomial p, again under an assumption from parameterized complexity theory. We match these lower bounds by corresponding upper bounds. 1.
Fixed parameter algorithms for planar dominating set and related problems
, 2000
"... We present an algorithm that constructively produces a solution to the k-dominating set problem for planar graphs in time O(c √ kn), where c = 36√34. To obtain this result, we show that the treewidth of a planar graph with domination number γ(G) is O ( � γ(G)), and that such a tree decomposition ca ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 32 (10 self)
- Add to MetaCart
We present an algorithm that constructively produces a solution to the k-dominating set problem for planar graphs in time O(c √ kn), where c = 36√34. To obtain this result, we show that the treewidth of a planar graph with domination number γ(G) is O ( � γ(G)), and that such a tree decomposition can be found in O ( � γ(G)n) time. The same technique can be used to show that the k-face cover problem (find a size k set of faces that cover all vertices of a given plane graph) can be solved √ k in O(c1 n + n2) time, where c1 = 236√34 and k is the size of the face cover set. Similar results can be obtained in the planar case for some variants of k-dominating set, e.g., k-independent dominating set and k-weighted dominating set. Keywords. NP-complete problems, fixed parameter tractability, planar graphs, planar dominating set, face cover, outerplanarity, treewidth.
Fixed-parameter algorithms for the (k, r)-center in planar graphs and map graphs
- ACM TRANSACTIONS ON ALGORITHMS
, 2003
"... ..."
Bidimensionality: New Connections between FPT Algorithms and PTASs
"... We demonstrate a new connection between fixed-parameter tractability and approximation algorithms for combinatorial optimization problems on planar graphs and their generalizations. Specifically, we extend the theory of so-called “bidimensional” problems to show that essentially all such problems ha ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 30 (4 self)
- Add to MetaCart
We demonstrate a new connection between fixed-parameter tractability and approximation algorithms for combinatorial optimization problems on planar graphs and their generalizations. Specifically, we extend the theory of so-called “bidimensional” problems to show that essentially all such problems have both subexponential fixed-parameter algorithms and PTASs. Bidimensional problems include e.g. feedback vertex set, vertex cover, minimum maximal matching, face cover, a series of vertex-removal problems, dominating set, edge dominating set, r-dominating set, diameter, connected dominating set, connected edge dominating set, and connected r-dominating set. We obtain PTASs for all of these problems in planar graphs and certain generalizations; of particular interest are our results for the two well-known problems of connected dominating set and general feedback vertex set for planar graphs and their generalizations, for which PTASs were not known to exist. Our techniques generalize and in some sense unify the two main previous approaches for designing PTASs in planar graphs, namely, the Lipton-Tarjan separator approach [FOCS’77] and the Baker layerwise decomposition approach [FOCS’83]. In particular, we replace the notion of separators with a more powerful tool from the bidimensionality theory, enabling the first approach to apply to a much broader class of minimization problems than previously possible; and through the use of a structural backbone and thickening of layers we demonstrate how the second approach can be applied to problems with a “nonlocal” structure.
Fixed-parameter tractability, definability, and model checking
- SIAM Journal on Computing
, 2001
"... In this article, we study parameterized complexity theory from the perspective of logic, or more specifically, descriptive complexity theory. We propose to consider parameterized model-checking problems for various fragments of first-order logic as generic parameterized problems and show how this ap ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 25 (11 self)
- Add to MetaCart
In this article, we study parameterized complexity theory from the perspective of logic, or more specifically, descriptive complexity theory. We propose to consider parameterized model-checking problems for various fragments of first-order logic as generic parameterized problems and show how this approach can be useful in studying both fixed-parameter tractability and intractability. For example, we establish the equivalence between the model-checking for existential first-order logic, the homomorphism problem for relational structures, and the substructure isomorphism problem. Our main tractability result shows that model-checking for first-order formulas is fixed-parameter tractable when restricted to a class of input structures with an excluded minor. On the intractability side, for everyØ�we prove an equivalence between model-checking for first-order formulas withØquantifier alternations and the parameterized halting problem for alternating Turing machines withØalternations. We discuss the close connection between this alternation hierarchy and Downey and Fellows ’ W-hierarchy. On a more abstract level, we consider two forms of definability, called Fagin definability and slicewise definability, that are appropriate for describing parameterized problems. We give a characterization of the class FPT of all fixedparameter tractable problems in terms of slicewise definability in finite variable least fixed-point logic, which is reminiscent of the Immerman-Vardi Theorem characterizing the class PTIME in terms of definability in least fixedpoint logic. 1
The parameterized complexity of counting problems
- SIAM Journal on Computing
, 2002
"... We develop a parameterized complexity theory for counting problems. As the basis of this theory, we introduce a hierarchy of parameterized counting complexity classes #W[t], for t ≥ 1, that corresponds to Downey and Fellows’s W-hierarchy [13] and show that a few central W-completeness results for de ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 24 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
We develop a parameterized complexity theory for counting problems. As the basis of this theory, we introduce a hierarchy of parameterized counting complexity classes #W[t], for t ≥ 1, that corresponds to Downey and Fellows’s W-hierarchy [13] and show that a few central W-completeness results for decision problems translate to #W-completeness results for the corresponding counting problems. Counting complexity gets interesting with problems whose decision version is tractable, but whose counting version is hard. Our main result states that counting cycles and paths of length k in both directed and undirected graphs, parameterized by k, is #W[1]-complete. This makes it highly unlikely that any of these problems is fixed-parameter tractable, even though their decision versions are fixed-parameter tractable. More explicitly, our result shows that most likely there is no f(k) · n c-algorithm for counting cycles or paths of length k in a graph of size n for any computable function f: N → N and constant c, even though there is a 2 O(k) · n 2.376 algorithm for finding a cycle or path of length k [2]. 1
Approximation Algorithms for Classes of Graphs Excluding Single-Crossing Graphs as Minors
"... Many problems that are intractable for general graphs allow polynomial-time solutions for structured classes of graphs, such as planar graphs and graphs of bounded treewidth. ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 22 (13 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Many problems that are intractable for general graphs allow polynomial-time solutions for structured classes of graphs, such as planar graphs and graphs of bounded treewidth.
Locally excluding a minor
, 2007
"... We introduce the concept of locally excluded minors. Graph classes locally excluding a minor generalise the concept of excluded minor classes but also of graph classes with bounded local tree-width and graph classes with bounded expansion. We show that first-order model-checking is fixed-parameter t ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 22 (8 self)
- Add to MetaCart
We introduce the concept of locally excluded minors. Graph classes locally excluding a minor generalise the concept of excluded minor classes but also of graph classes with bounded local tree-width and graph classes with bounded expansion. We show that first-order model-checking is fixed-parameter tractable on any class of graphs locally excluding a minor. This strictly generalises analogous results by Flum and Grohe on excluded minor classes and Frick and Grohe on classes with bounded local tree-width. As an important consequence of the proof we obtain fixed-parameter algorithms for problems such as dominating or independent set on graph classes excluding a minor, where now the parameter is the size of the dominating set and the excluded minor. We also study graph classes with excluded minors, where the minor may grow slowly with the size of the graphs and show that again, firstorder model-checking is fixed-parameter tractable on any such class of graphs.
Equivalence of Local Treewidth and Linear Local Treewidth and its Algorithmic Applications
- In Proceedings of the 15th ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA’04
, 2003
"... We solve an open problem posed by Eppstein in 1995 [14, 15] and re-enforced by Grohe [16, 17] concerning locally bounded treewidth in minor-closed families of graphs. A graph has bounded local treewidth if the subgraph induced by vertices within distance r of any vertex has treewidth bounded by a f ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 21 (9 self)
- Add to MetaCart
We solve an open problem posed by Eppstein in 1995 [14, 15] and re-enforced by Grohe [16, 17] concerning locally bounded treewidth in minor-closed families of graphs. A graph has bounded local treewidth if the subgraph induced by vertices within distance r of any vertex has treewidth bounded by a function of r (not n). Eppstein characterized minor-closed families of graphs with bounded local treewidth as precisely minor-closed families that minor-exclude an apex graph, where an apex graph has one vertex whose removal leaves a planar graph. In particular, Eppstein showed that all apex-minor-free graphs have bounded local treewidth, but his bound is doubly exponential in r, leaving open whether a tighter bound could be obtained. We improve this doubly exponential bound to a linear bound, which is optimal. In particular, any minor-closed graph family with bounded local treewidth has linear local treewidth. Our bound generalizes previously known linear bounds for special classes of graphs proved by several authors. As a consequence of our result, we obtain substantially faster polynomial-time approximation schemes for a broad class of problems in apex-minor-free graphs, improving the running time from .

