Results 1 -
5 of
5
Priced Oblivious Transfer: How to Sell Digital Goods
- In Birgit Pfitzmann, editor, Advances in Cryptology — EUROCRYPT 2001, volume 2045 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science
, 2001
"... Abstract. We consider the question of protecting the privacy of customers buying digital goods. More specifically, our goal is to allow a buyer to purchase digital goods from a vendor without letting the vendor learn what, and to the extent possible also when and how much, it is buying. We propose s ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 81 (5 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Abstract. We consider the question of protecting the privacy of customers buying digital goods. More specifically, our goal is to allow a buyer to purchase digital goods from a vendor without letting the vendor learn what, and to the extent possible also when and how much, it is buying. We propose solutions which allow the buyer, after making an initial deposit, to engage in an unlimited number of priced oblivioustransfer protocols, satisfying the following requirements: As long as the buyer’s balance contains sufficient funds, it will successfully retrieve the selected item and its balance will be debited by the item’s price. However, the buyer should be unable to retrieve an item whose cost exceeds its remaining balance. The vendor should learn nothing except what must inevitably be learned, namely, the amount of interaction and the initial deposit amount (which imply upper bounds on the quantity and total price of all information obtained by the buyer). In particular, the vendor should be unable to learn what the buyer’s current balance is or when it actually runs out of its funds. The technical tools we develop, in the process of solving this problem, seem to be of independent interest. In particular, we present the first one-round (two-pass) protocol for oblivious transfer that does not rely on the random oracle model (a very similar protocol was independently proposed by Naor and Pinkas [21]). This protocol is a special case of a more general “conditional disclosure ” methodology, which extends a previous approach from [11] and adapts it to the 2-party setting. 1
Extending Oblivious Transfers Efficiently
, 2003
"... We consider the problem of extending oblivious transfers: Given a small number of oblivious transfers \for free," can one implement a large number of oblivious transfers? Beaver has shown how to extend oblivious transfers given a one-way function. However, this protocol is inecient in practice, ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 35 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
We consider the problem of extending oblivious transfers: Given a small number of oblivious transfers \for free," can one implement a large number of oblivious transfers? Beaver has shown how to extend oblivious transfers given a one-way function. However, this protocol is inecient in practice, in part due to its non-black-box use of the underlying one-way function.
Batch Codes and Their Applications
, 2004
"... A batch code encodes a string x into an m-tuple of strings, called buckets, such that each batch of k bits from x can be decoded by reading at most one (more generally, t) bits from each bucket. Batch codes can be viewed as relaxing several combinatorial objects, including expanders and locally deco ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 13 (5 self)
- Add to MetaCart
A batch code encodes a string x into an m-tuple of strings, called buckets, such that each batch of k bits from x can be decoded by reading at most one (more generally, t) bits from each bucket. Batch codes can be viewed as relaxing several combinatorial objects, including expanders and locally decodable codes.
Filtering for private collaborative benchmarking
- International Conference on Emergin Trends in Information and Communication Security, LNCS 3995
, 2006
"... Abstract. Collaborative Benchmarking is an important issue for modern enterprises, but the business performance quantities used as input are often highly confidential. Secure Multi-Party Computation can offer protocols that can compute benchmarks without leaking the input variables. Benchmarking is ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 2 (1 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Abstract. Collaborative Benchmarking is an important issue for modern enterprises, but the business performance quantities used as input are often highly confidential. Secure Multi-Party Computation can offer protocols that can compute benchmarks without leaking the input variables. Benchmarking is a process of comparing to the “best”, so often it is necessary to only include the k-best enterprises for computing a benchmark to not distort the result with some outlying performances. We present a protocol that can be used as a filter, before running any collaborative benchmarking protocol that restricts the participants to the k best values. Our protocol doesn’t use the general circuit construction technique for SMC aiming to optimize performance. As building blocks we present the fastest implementation of Yao’s millionaires ’ protocol and a protocol that achieves a fair shuffle in O(log n) rounds. 1
Efficient Reduction of 1 out of N Oblivious Transfers in Random Oracle Model
, 2005
"... We first present a protocol which reduces 1-of-n oblivious transfer OT m for n > 2 in random oracle model, and show that the protocol is secure against malicious sender and semi-honest receiver. Then, by employing a cut-and-choose technique, we obtain a variant of the basic protocol which is secure ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
We first present a protocol which reduces 1-of-n oblivious transfer OT m for n > 2 in random oracle model, and show that the protocol is secure against malicious sender and semi-honest receiver. Then, by employing a cut-and-choose technique, we obtain a variant of the basic protocol which is secure against a malicious receiver.

