: Existing works on the construction of correct compilers have at least one of the following drawbacks: (i) correct compilers do not compile into machine code of existing processors. Instead they compile into programs of an abstract machine which ignores limitations and properties of real-life processors. (ii) the code generated by correct compilers is orders of magnitudes slower than the code generated by unverified compilers. (iii) the considered source language is much less complex than real-life programming languages. This paper focuses on the construction of correct compiler backends which generate machine-code for real-life processors from realistic intermediate languages. Our main results are the following: (i) We present a proof approach based on abstract state machines for bottom-up rewriting system specifications (BURS) for back-end generators. A significant part of this proof can be parametrized with the intermediate and machine language. (ii) The performance of the code con...

We have designed, implemented, and proved the correctness of a compiler generator that accepts action semantic descriptions of imperative programming languages. The generated compilers emit absolute code for an abstract RISC machine language that currently is assembled into code for the SPARC and the HP Precision Architecture. Our machine language needs no run-time type-checking and is thus more realistic than those considered in previous compiler proofs. We use solely algebraic specifications; proofs are given in the initial model. 1 Introduction The previous approaches to proving correctness of compilers for non-trivial languages all use target code with run-time type-checking. The following semantic rule is typical for these target languages: (FIRST : C; hv 1 ; v 2 i : S) ! (C; v 1 : S) The rule describes the semantics of an instruction that extracts the first component of the top-element of the stack, provided that the top-element is a pair. If not, then it is implicit that the...

We report about a joint project of the universities at Karlsruhe, Kiel and Ulm on how to get correct compilers for realistic programming languages. Arguing about compiler correctness must start from a compiling specification describing the correspondence of source and target language in formal terms. We have chosen to use abstract state machines to formalize this correspondence. This allows us to stay with traditional compiler architectures for subdividing the compiler task. A main achievement is the use of program checking for replacing large parts of compiler verification by the much simpler task of verifying program checkers.

Compiler generation based on Mosses' action semantics has been studied by Brown, Moura, and Watt, and also by the second author. The core of each of their systems is a handwritten action compiler, producing either C or machine code. We have obtained an action compiler in a much simpler way: by partial evaluation of an action interpreter. Even though our compiler produces Scheme code, the code runs as fast as that produced by the previous action compilers. 1 Introduction Action semantics is a framework for formal semantics of programming languages, developed by Mosses [16, 17, 18] and Watt [19, 26]. It differs from denotational semantics in using semantic entities called actions, rather than higher-order functions. Compiler generation based on action semantics has been studied by Brown, Moura, and Watt [6], and also by the second author [22, 20, 21]. Journal of Functional Programming, 6(2):269--298, 1996. Also in Proc. FPCA'93, pages 308--317. The core of each of their two action se...

We describe an approach to mechanically prove the correctness of BURS specifications and show how such a tool can be connected with BURS based back-end generators [9]. The proofs are based on the operational semantics of both source and target system languages specified by means of Abstract State Machines [14]. In [27] we decomposed the correctness condition based on these operational semantics into local correctness conditions for each BURS rule and showed that these local correctness conditions can be proven independently. The specification and verification system PVS is used to mechanicaly verify BURS-rules based on formal representations of the languages involved. In particular, we have defined PVS proof strategies which enable an automatic verification of the rules. Using PVS, several erroneous rules have been found. Moreover, from failed proof attempts we were able to correct them.

: This thesis describes some interplays between the specification and the implementation of higher-order programming languages. We first investigate a traditional implementation of Scheme (compiler, run-time machine). We then turn to Action Semantics. And finally we cross-fertilize these two approaches using both syntax-directed and type-directed partial evaluation and introducing an alternative representation of data structures. December 1997 To my late father Acknowledgments First of all I thank my supervisor, Olivier Danvy, from whom I learn every day. I appreciate his technical expertise and his knowledge of how to work scientifically. His insight in computer science and his will to share this insight with his students exceeds what I have otherwise been exposed to. Peter D. Mosses's course at DAIMI in the spring of 1997 was an inspiring tour of Action Semantics. Rene Vestergaard gave useful comments on a draft of this thesis of both syntactic and semantic nature. He pointed ou...

Action semantics is a semantic meta-language developed by Mosses and Watt for specifying programming languages. The work reported in this thesis is part of a project to develop a system, called ACTRESS, that is a semantics-directed compiler generator based on action semantics. The aims of this project are to demonstrate the suitability of action semantics for this task, and to produce a system that improves on the performance of previous semantics-directed compiler generators. Moreover the ACTRESS system aims to accept a wide range of programming languages, including dynamically-scoped and dynamically-typed languages, but not to penalise the implementations of statically-typed or statically-bound languages as a result. ACTRESS automatically generates a compiler from an action semantic description of a programming language, and has been used to generate compilers for a small declarative language and a small imperative language. The generated compiler uses a number of standard modules to...

s from the Third Workshop Flemming Nielson (editor) October 1993 1 Introduction The third DART workshop took place on Thursday August l9th and Friday August 20th at the Department of Computer Science (DIKU) at the University of Copenhagen; it was organized by Mads Rosendahl and others at DIKU, and Torben Amtoft and Susanne Brønberg helped producing this report. The first day comprised survey presentations whereas the second contained more research oriented talks. The primary aim of the workshop was to increase the awareness of DART participants for each other's work, to stimulate collaboration between the di#erent groups, and to inform Danish industry about the skills possessed by the groups. The DART project started in March 1991 (prematurely terminating a smaller project on Formal Implementation, Transformation and Analysis of Programs) and is funded by the Danish Research Councils as part of the Danish Research Programme on Informatics. To date it has received about 8 million Danis...

Abstract not found