Decision trees have proved to be valuable tools for the description, classification and generalization of data. Work on constructing decision trees from data exists in multiple disciplines such as statistics, pattern recognition, decision theory, signal processing, machine learning and artificial neural networks. Researchers in these disciplines, sometimes working on quite different problems, identified similar issues and heuristics for decision tree construction. This paper surveys existing work on decision tree construction, attempting to identify the important issues involved, directions the work has taken and the current state of the art. Keywords: classification, tree-structured classifiers, data compaction 1. Introduction Advances in data collection methods, storage and processing technology are providing a unique challenge and opportunity for automated data exploration techniques. Enormous amounts of data are being collected daily from major scientific projects e.g., Human Genome...

Abstract not found

The standard approach to decision tree induction is a top-down, greedy algorithm that makes locally optimal, irrevocable decisions at each node of a tree. In this paper, we study an alternative approach, in which the algorithms use limited lookahead to decide what test to use at a node. We systematically compare, using a very large number of decision trees, the quality of decision trees induced by the greedy approach to that of trees induced using lookahead. The main results of our experiments are: (i) the greedy approach produces trees that are just as accurate as trees produced with the much more expensive lookahead step; and (ii) decision tree induction exhibits pathology, in the sense that lookahead can produce trees that are both larger and less accurate than trees produced without it. 1. Introduction The standard algorithm for constructing decision trees from a set of examples is greedy induction --- a tree is induced top-down with locally optimal choices made at each node, with...

A fundamental problem in model-based computer vision is that of identifying which of a given set of geometric models is present in an image. Considering a "probe" to be an oracle that tells us whether or not a model is present at a given point, we study the problem of computing efficient strategies ("decision trees") for probing an image, with the goal to minimize the number of probes necessary (in the worst case) to determine which single model is present. We show that a dlg ke height binary decision tree always exists for k polygonal models (in fixed position), provided (1) they are non-degenerate (do not share boundaries) and (2) they share a common point of intersection. Further, we give an efficient algorithm for constructing such decision tress when the models are given as a set of polygons in the plane. We show that constructing a minimum height tree is NP-complete if either of the two assumptions is omitted. We provide an efficient greedy heuristic strategy and show ...

Knowledge Discovery in Databases (KDD) is an active research area with the promise for a high payoff in many business and scientific applications. The grand challenge of knowledge discovery in databases is to automatically process large quantities of raw data, identify the most significant and meaningful patterns, and present this knowledge in an appropriate form for achieving the user's goal. Knowledge discovery systems face challenging problems from the real-world databases which tend to be very large, redundant, noisy and dynamic. Each of these problems has been addressed to some extent within machine learning, but few, if any, systems address them all. Collectively handling these problems while producing useful knowledge efficiently and effectively is the main focus of the thesis. In this thesis, we develop an attribute-oriented rough set approach for knowledge discovery in databases. The method adopts the artificial intelligent "learning from examples" paradigm combined with rough...

1 . The point of game tree search is to insulate oneself from errors in the evaluation function. The standard approach is to grow a full width tree as deep as time allows, and then value the tree as if the leaf evaluations were exact. This has been effective in many games because of the computational efficiency of the Alphabeta algorithm. But as Bayesians, we want to know the best way to use the inexact statistical information provided by the leaf evaluator to choose our next move. We add a model of uncertainty to the standard evaluation function. Within such a formal model, there is an optimal tree growth procedure and an optimal method of valuing the tree. We describe how to optimally value the tree within our model, and how to efficiently approximate the optimal tree to search. Our tree growth procedure provably approximates the contribution of each leaf to the utility in the limit where we grow a large tree, taking explicit account of the interactions between expanding different ...

Abstract not found

Most existing decision tree systems use a greedy approach to induce trees --- locally optimal splits are induced at every node of the tree. Although the greedy approach is suboptimal, it is believed to produce reasonably good trees. In the current work, we attempt to verify this belief. We quantify the goodness of greedy tree induction empirically, using the popular decision tree algorithms, C4.5 and CART. We induce decision trees on thousands of synthetic data sets and compare them to the corresponding optimal trees, which in turn are found using a novel map coloring idea. We measure the effect on greedy induction of variables such as the underlying concept complexity, training set size, noise and dimensionality. Our experiments show, among other things, that the expected classification cost of a greedily induced tree is consistently very close to that of the optimal tree. Introduction Decision trees are known to be effective classifiers in a variety of domains. Most of the methods ...

We propose a novel feature selection method based on a Variable Memory Markov model (VMM). The VMM was originally proposed as a generative model trying to preserve the original source statistics from training data.

We show that all strictly convex \ impurity measures lead to splits at boundary points, and furthermore show that certain rational splitting rules, notably the information gain ratio, also have this property. A slightly weaker result is shown to hold for impurity measures that are only convex \, such as Inaccuracy. 1