This is the nineteenth edition of a (usually) quarterly column that covers new developments in the theory of NP-completeness. The presentation is modeled on that used by M. R. Garey and myself in our book ‘‘Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness,’ ’ W. H. Freeman & Co., New York, 1979 (hereinafter referred to as ‘‘[G&J]’’; previous columns will be referred to by their dates). A background equivalent to that provided by [G&J] is assumed, and, when appropriate, cross-references will be given to that book and the list of problems (NP-complete and harder) presented there. Readers who have results they would like mentioned (NP-hardness, PSPACE-hardness, polynomial-time-solvability, etc.) or open problems they would like publicized, should

The paper considers two decision problems on hypergraphs, hypergraph saturation and recognition of the transversal hypergraph, and discusses their significance for several search problems in applied computer science. Hypergraph saturation, i.e., given a hypergraph H, decide if every subset of vertices is contained in or contains some edge of H, is shown to be co-NP-complete. A certain subproblem of hypergraph saturation, the saturation of simple hypergraphs, is shown to be computationally equivalent to transversal hypergraph recognition, i.e., given two hypergraphs H 1; H 2, decide if the sets in H 2 are all the minimal transversals of H 1. The complexity of the search problem related to the recognition of the transversal hypergraph, the computation of the transversal hypergraph, is an open problem. This task needs time exponential in the input size, but it is unknown whether an output-polynomial algorithm exists for this problem. For several important subcases, for instance if an upper or lower bound is imposed on the edge size or for acyclic hypergraphs, we present output-polynomial algorithms. Computing or recognizing the minimal transversals of a hypergraph is a frequent problem in practice, which is pointed out by identifying important applications in database theory, Boolean switching theory, logic, and AI, particularly in model-based diagnosis.

\Because nature isn't classical, dammit..."

Counting classes consist of languages defined in terms of the number of accepting computations of nondeterministic polynomial-time Turing machines. Well known examples of counting classes are NP, co-NP, \PhiP, and PP. Every counting class is a subset of P #P[1] , the class of languages computable in polynomial time using a single call to an oracle capable of determining the number of accepting paths of an NP machine. Using closure properties of #P, we systematically develop a complexity theory for counting classes defined in terms of thresholds and moduli. An unexpected result is that MOD k iP = MOD k P for prime k. Finally, we improve a result of Cai and Hemachandra by showing that recognizing languages in the class Few is as easy as distinguishing uniquely satisfiable formulas from unsatisfiable formulas (or detecting unique solutions, as in [28]). 1. Introduction Valiant [27] defined the class #P of functions whose values equal the number of accepting paths of polynomial-time bo...

A perfect zero-knowledge interactive proof is a protocol by which Alice can convince Bob of the truth of some theorem in a way that yields no information as to how the proof might proceed (in the sense of Shannon's information theory). We give a general technique for achieving this goal for any problem in NP (and beyond). The fact that our protocol is perfect zero-knowledge does not depend on unproved cryptographic assumptions. Furthermore, our protocol is powerful enough to allow Alice to convince Bob of theorems for which she does not even have a proof. Whenever Alice can convince herself probabilistically of a theorem, perhaps thanks to her knowledge of some trap-door information, she can convince Bob as well, without compromising the trap-door in any way. This results in a non-transitive transfer of confidence from Alice to Bob, because Bob will not be able to convince anyone else afterwards. Our protocol is dual to those of [GrMiWi86a, BrCr86]. 1. INTRODUCTION Assume that Alice h...

This is a non-technical survey paper of recent quantum-mechanical discoveries that challenge generally accepted complexity-theoretic versions of the Church--Turing thesis. In particular, building on pionering work of David Deutsch and Richard Jozsa, we construct an oracle relative to which there exists a set that can be recognized in Quantum Polynomial Time (QP), yet any Turing machine that recognizes it would require exponential time even if allowed to be probabilistic, provided that errors are not tolerated. In particular, QP 6` ZPP relative to this oracle. Furthermore, there are cryptographic tasks that are demonstrably impossible to implement with unlimited computing power probabilistic interactive Turing machines, yet they can be implemented even in practice by quantum mechanical apparatus. 1 Deutsch's Quantum Computer In a bold paper published in the Proceedings of the Royal Society, David Deutsch put forth in 1985 the quantum computer [7] (see also [8]). Even though this may c...

A zero-knowledge interactive proof is a protocol by which Alice can convince a polynomially-bounded Bob of the truth of some theorem without giving him any hint as to how the proof might proceed. Under cryptographic assumptions, we give a general technique for achieving this goal for any problem in NP. This extends to a presumably larger class, which combines the powers of non-determinism and randomness. Our protocol is powerful enough to allow Alice to convince Bob of theorems for which she does not even have a proof. Whenever Alice can convince herself probabilistically of a theorem, perhaps thanks to her knowledge of some trap-door information, she can convince Bob as well, without compromising the trap-door in any way. 1. INTRODUCTION The notion of zero-knowledge interactive proofs (ZKIP) introduced a few years ago by Goldwasser, Micali and Rackoff [GwMiRac85] has become a very active research area. Assume that Alice holds the proof of some theorem. A zero-knowledge interactive pr...

A set A is p-terse (p-superterse) if, for all q, it is not possible to answer q queries to A by making only q \Gamma 1 queries to A (any set X). Formally, let PF A q-tt be the class of functions reducible to A via a polynomial-time truthtable reduction of norm q, and let PF A q-T be the class of functions reducible to A via a polynomial-time Turing reduction that makes at most q queries. A set A is p-terse if PF A q-tt 6` PF A (q\Gamma1)-T for all constants q. A is p-superterse if PF A q-tt 6` PF X q-T for all constants q and sets X . We show that all NP-hard sets (under p tt -reductions) are p-superterse, unless it is possible to distinguish uniquely satisfiable formulas from satisfiable formulas in polynomial time. Consequently, all NP-complete sets are psuperterse unless P = UP (one-way functions fail to exist), R = NP (there exist randomized polynomial-time algorithms for all problems in NP), and the polynomial-time hierarchy collapses. This mostly solves the main open...

this paper contains a list of 36 open problems in numbertheoretic complexity. We expect that none of these problems are easy; we are sure that many of them are hard. This list of problems reflects our own interests and should not be viewed as definitive. As the field changes and becomes deeper, new problems will emerge and old problems will lose favor. Ideally there will be other `open problems' papers in future ANTS proceedings to help guide the field. It is likely that some of the problems presented here will remain open for the forseeable future. However, it is possible in some cases to make progress by solving subproblems, or by establishing reductions between problems, or by settling problems under the assumption of one or more well known hypotheses (e.g. the various extended Riemann hypotheses, NP 6= P; NP 6= coNP). For the sake of clarity we have often chosen to state a specific version of a problem rather than a general one. For example, questions about the integers modulo a prime often have natural generalizations to arbitrary finite fields, to arbitrary cyclic groups, or to problems with a composite modulus. Questions about the integers often have natural generalizations to the ring of integers in an algebraic number field, and questions about elliptic curves often generalize to arbitrary curves or abelian varieties. The problems presented here arose from many different places and times. To those whose research has generated these problems or has contributed to our present understanding of them but to whom inadequate acknowledgement is given here, we apologize. Our list of open problems is derived from an earlier `open problems' paper we wrote in 1986 [AM86]. When we wrote the first version of this paper, we feared that the problems presented were so difficult...

Abstract not found