Results 1  10
of
18
Computational Complexity Of Neural Networks: A Survey
, 1994
"... . We survey some of the central results in the complexity theory of discrete neural networks, with pointers to the literature. Our main emphasis is on the computational power of various acyclic and cyclic network models, but we also discuss briefly the complexity aspects of synthesizing networks fr ..."
Abstract

Cited by 22 (6 self)
 Add to MetaCart
. We survey some of the central results in the complexity theory of discrete neural networks, with pointers to the literature. Our main emphasis is on the computational power of various acyclic and cyclic network models, but we also discuss briefly the complexity aspects of synthesizing networks from examples of their behavior. CR Classification: F.1.1 [Computation by Abstract Devices]: Models of Computationneural networks, circuits; F.1.3 [Computation by Abstract Devices ]: Complexity Classescomplexity hierarchies Key words: Neural networks, computational complexity, threshold circuits, associative memory 1. Introduction The currently again very active field of computation by "neural" networks has opened up a wealth of fascinating research topics in the computational complexity analysis of the models considered. While much of the general appeal of the field stems not so much from new computational possibilities, but from the possibility of "learning", or synthesizing networks...
Computing with Truly Asynchronous Threshold Logic Networks
 THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE
, 1995
"... We present simulation mechanisms by which any network of threshold logic units with either symmetric or asymmetric interunit connections (i.e., a symmetric or asymmetric "Hopfield net") can be simulated on a network of the same type, but without any a priori constraints on the order of updates of th ..."
Abstract

Cited by 19 (7 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We present simulation mechanisms by which any network of threshold logic units with either symmetric or asymmetric interunit connections (i.e., a symmetric or asymmetric "Hopfield net") can be simulated on a network of the same type, but without any a priori constraints on the order of updates of the units. Together with earlier constructions, the results show that the truly asynchronous network model is computationally equivalent to the seemingly more powerful models with either ordered sequential or fully parallel updates.
Complexity Issues in Discrete Hopfield Networks
, 1994
"... We survey some aspects of the computational complexity theory of discretetime and discretestate Hopfield networks. The emphasis is on topics that are not adequately covered by the existing survey literature, most significantly: 1. the known upper and lower bounds for the convergence times of Hopfi ..."
Abstract

Cited by 18 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We survey some aspects of the computational complexity theory of discretetime and discretestate Hopfield networks. The emphasis is on topics that are not adequately covered by the existing survey literature, most significantly: 1. the known upper and lower bounds for the convergence times of Hopfield nets (here we consider mainly worstcase results); 2. the power of Hopfield nets as general computing devices (as opposed to their applications to associative memory and optimization); 3. the complexity of the synthesis ("learning") and analysis problems related to Hopfield nets as associative memories. Draft chapter for the forthcoming book The Computational and Learning Complexity of Neural Networks: Advanced Topics (ed. Ian Parberry).
Neural Networks and Complexity Theory
 In Proc. 17th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science
, 1992
"... . We survey some of the central results in the complexity theory of discrete neural networks, with pointers to the literature. 1 Introduction The recently revived field of computation by "neural" networks provides the complexity theorist with a wealth of fascinating research topics. While much of ..."
Abstract

Cited by 14 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
. We survey some of the central results in the complexity theory of discrete neural networks, with pointers to the literature. 1 Introduction The recently revived field of computation by "neural" networks provides the complexity theorist with a wealth of fascinating research topics. While much of the general appeal of the field stems not so much from new computational possibilities, but from the possibility of "learning", or synthesizing networks directly from examples of their desired inputoutput behavior, it is nevertheless important to pay attention also to the complexity issues: firstly, what kinds of functions are computable by networks of a given type and size, and secondly, what is the complexity of the synthesis problems considered. In fact, inattention to these issues was a significant factor in the demise of the first stage of neural networks research in the late 60's, under the criticism of Minsky and Papert [51]. The intent of this paper is to survey some of the centra...
The Computational Power of Discrete Hopfield Nets with Hidden Units
 Neural Computation
, 1996
"... We prove that polynomial size discrete Hopfield networks with hidden units compute exactly the class of Boolean functions PSPACE/poly, i.e., the same functions as are computed by polynomial spacebounded nonuniform Turing machines. As a corollary to the construction, we observe also that networks wi ..."
Abstract

Cited by 11 (6 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We prove that polynomial size discrete Hopfield networks with hidden units compute exactly the class of Boolean functions PSPACE/poly, i.e., the same functions as are computed by polynomial spacebounded nonuniform Turing machines. As a corollary to the construction, we observe also that networks with polynomially bounded interconnection weights compute exactly the class of functions P/poly, i.e., the class computed by polynomial timebounded nonuniform Turing machines.
An Overview Of The Computational Power Of Recurrent Neural Networks
 Proceedings of the 9th Finnish AI Conference STeP 2000{Millennium of AI, Espoo, Finland (Vol. 3: "AI of Tomorrow": Symposium on Theory, Finnish AI Society
, 2000
"... INTRODUCTION The two main streams of neural networks research consider neural networks either as a powerful family of nonlinear statistical models, to be used in for example pattern recognition applications [6], or as formal models to help develop a computational understanding of the brain [10]. His ..."
Abstract

Cited by 10 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
INTRODUCTION The two main streams of neural networks research consider neural networks either as a powerful family of nonlinear statistical models, to be used in for example pattern recognition applications [6], or as formal models to help develop a computational understanding of the brain [10]. Historically, the brain theory interest was primary [32], but with the advances in computer technology, the application potential of the statistical modeling techniques has shifted the balance. 1 The study of neural networks as general computational devices does not strictly follow this division of interests: rather, it provides a general framework outlining the limitations and possibilities aecting both research domains. The prime historic example here is obviously Minsky's and Papert's 1969 study of the computational limitations of singlelayer perceptrons [34], which was a major inuence in turning away interest from neural network learning to symbolic AI techniques for more
On the Computational Power of Discrete Hopfield Nets
 In: Proc. 20th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming
, 1993
"... . We prove that polynomial size discrete synchronous Hopfield networks with hidden units compute exactly the class of Boolean functions PSPACE/poly, i.e., the same functions as are computed by polynomial spacebounded nonuniform Turing machines. As a corollary to the construction, we observe also th ..."
Abstract

Cited by 7 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
. We prove that polynomial size discrete synchronous Hopfield networks with hidden units compute exactly the class of Boolean functions PSPACE/poly, i.e., the same functions as are computed by polynomial spacebounded nonuniform Turing machines. As a corollary to the construction, we observe also that networks with polynomially bounded interconnection weights compute exactly the class of functions P/poly. 1 Background Recurrent, or cyclic, neural networks are an intriguing model of massively parallel computation. In the recent surge of research in neural computation, such networks have been considered mostly from the point of view of two types of applications: pattern classification and associative memory (e.g. [16, 18, 21, 24]), and combinatorial optimization (e.g. [1, 7, 20]). Nevertheless, recurrent networks are capable also of more general types of computation, and issues of what exactly such networks can compute, and how they should be programmed, are becoming increasingly topica...
A ContinuousTime Hopfield Net Simulation of Discrete Neural Networks
, 2000
"... We investigate the computational power of continuoustime symmetric Hopfield nets. As is well known, such networks have very constrained, Liapunovfunction controlled dynamics. Nevertheless, we show that they are universal and efficient computational devices, in the sense that any convergent fully p ..."
Abstract

Cited by 5 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We investigate the computational power of continuoustime symmetric Hopfield nets. As is well known, such networks have very constrained, Liapunovfunction controlled dynamics. Nevertheless, we show that they are universal and efficient computational devices, in the sense that any convergent fully parallel computation by a network of n discretetime binary neurons, with in general asymmetric interconnections, can be simulated by a symmetric continuoustime Hopfield net containing only 14n + 6 units using the saturatedlinear sigmoid activation function. In terms of standard discrete computation models this result implies that any polynomially spacebounded Turing machine can be simulated by a polynomially sizeincreasing sequence of continuoustime Hopfield nets.
ContinuousTime Symmetric Hopfield Nets Are Computationally Universal
"... We establish a fundamental result in the theory of computation by continuoustime dynamical systems, by showing that systems corresponding to so called continuoustime symmetric Hopfield nets are capable of general computation. As is well known, such networks have very constrained, Liapunovfunction ..."
Abstract

Cited by 3 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We establish a fundamental result in the theory of computation by continuoustime dynamical systems, by showing that systems corresponding to so called continuoustime symmetric Hopfield nets are capable of general computation. As is well known, such networks have very constrained, Liapunovfunction controlled dynamics. Nevertheless, we show that they are universal and efficient computational devices, in the sense that any convergent synchronous fully parallel computation by a recurrent network of n discretetime binary neurons, with in general asymmetric coupling weights, can be simulated by a symmetric continuoustime Hopfield net containing only 18n+7 units employing the saturatedlinear activation function. Moreover, if the asymmetric network has maximum integer weight size w_max and converges in discrete time t*, then the corresponding Hopfield net can be designed to operate in continuous time Θ(t*/ε), for any ε > 0...
General Purpose Computation with Neural Networks: A Survey of Complexity Theoretic Results
, 2003
"... We survey and summarize the existing literature on the computational aspects of neural network models, by presenting a detailed taxonomy of the various models according to their complexity theoretic characteristics. The criteria of classi cation include e.g. the architecture of the network (fee ..."
Abstract

Cited by 2 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We survey and summarize the existing literature on the computational aspects of neural network models, by presenting a detailed taxonomy of the various models according to their complexity theoretic characteristics. The criteria of classi cation include e.g. the architecture of the network (feedforward vs. recurrent), time model (discrete vs. continuous), state type (binary vs. analog), weight constraints (symmetric vs. asymmetric), network size ( nite nets vs. in  nite families), computation type (deterministic vs. probabilistic), etc.