Results 1  10
of
101
Competitive Paging With Locality of Reference
 Journal of Computer and System Sciences
, 1991
"... Abstract The SleatorTarjan competitive analysis of paging [Comm. of the ACM; 28:202 208, 1985] gives us the ability to make strong theoretical statements about the performance of paging algorithms without making probabilistic assumptions on the input. Nevertheless practitioners voice reservations ..."
Abstract

Cited by 128 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract The SleatorTarjan competitive analysis of paging [Comm. of the ACM; 28:202 208, 1985] gives us the ability to make strong theoretical statements about the performance of paging algorithms without making probabilistic assumptions on the input. Nevertheless practitioners voice reservations about the model, citing its inability to discern between LRU and FIFO (algorithms whose performances differ markedly in practice), and the fact that the theoretical competitiveness of LRU is much larger than observed in practice. In addition, we would like to address the following important question: given some knowledge of a program's reference pattern, can we use it to improve paging performance on that program?
Biconnectivity Approximations and Graph Carvings
, 1994
"... A spanning tree in a graph is the smallest connected spanning subgraph. Given a graph, how does one find the smallest (i.e., least number of edges) 2connected spanning subgraph (connectivity refers to both edge and vertex connectivity, if not specified) ? Unfortunately, the problem is known to be ..."
Abstract

Cited by 97 (5 self)
 Add to MetaCart
A spanning tree in a graph is the smallest connected spanning subgraph. Given a graph, how does one find the smallest (i.e., least number of edges) 2connected spanning subgraph (connectivity refers to both edge and vertex connectivity, if not specified) ? Unfortunately, the problem is known to be NP hard. We consider the problem of finding a better approximation to the smallest 2connected subgraph, by an efficient algorithm. For 2edge connectivity our algorithm guarantees a solution that is no more than 3 2 times the optimal. For 2vertex connectivity our algorithm guarantees a solution that is no more than 5 3 times the optimal. The previous best approximation factor is 2 for each of these problems. The new algorithms (and their analyses) depend upon a structure called a carving of a graph, which is of independent interest. We show that approximating the optimal solution to within an additive constant is NP hard as well. We also consider the case where the graph has edge weigh...
Efficient parallel graph algorithms for coarse grained multicomputers and BSP (Extended Abstract)
 in Proc. 24th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP'97
, 1997
"... In this paper, we present deterministic parallel algorithms for the coarse grained multicomputer (CGM) and bulksynchronous parallel computer (BSP) models which solve the following well known graph problems: (1) list ranking, (2) Euler tour construction, (3) computing the connected components and s ..."
Abstract

Cited by 63 (23 self)
 Add to MetaCart
In this paper, we present deterministic parallel algorithms for the coarse grained multicomputer (CGM) and bulksynchronous parallel computer (BSP) models which solve the following well known graph problems: (1) list ranking, (2) Euler tour construction, (3) computing the connected components and spanning forest, (4) lowest common ancestor preprocessing, (5) tree contraction and expression tree evaluation, (6) computing an ear decomposition or open ear decomposition, (7) 2edge connectivity and biconnectivity (testing and component computation), and (8) cordal graph recognition (finding a perfect elimination ordering). The algorithms for Problems 17 require O(log p) communication rounds and linear sequential work per round. Our results for Problems 1 and 2, i.e.they are fully scalable, and for Problems hold for arbitrary ratios n p 38 it is assumed that n p,>0, which is true for all commercially
Parallel Algorithmic Techniques for Combinatorial Computation
 Ann. Rev. Comput. Sci
, 1988
"... this paper and supplied many helpful comments. This research was supported in part by NSF grants DCR8511713, CCR8605353, and CCR8814977, and by DARPA contract N0003984C0165. ..."
Abstract

Cited by 35 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
this paper and supplied many helpful comments. This research was supported in part by NSF grants DCR8511713, CCR8605353, and CCR8814977, and by DARPA contract N0003984C0165.
Finding Triconnected Components By Local Replacement
, 1993
"... . We present a parallel algorithm for finding triconnected components on a CRCW PRAM. The time complexity of our algorithm is O(log n) and the processortime product is O((m + n) log log n) where n is the number of vertices, and m is the number of edges of the input graph. Our algorithm, like other ..."
Abstract

Cited by 31 (6 self)
 Add to MetaCart
. We present a parallel algorithm for finding triconnected components on a CRCW PRAM. The time complexity of our algorithm is O(log n) and the processortime product is O((m + n) log log n) where n is the number of vertices, and m is the number of edges of the input graph. Our algorithm, like other parallel algorithms for this problem, is based on open ear decomposition but it employs a new technique, local replacement, to improve the complexity. Only the need to use the subroutines for connected components and integer sorting, for which no optimal parallel algorithm that runs in O(log n) time is known, prevents our algorithm from achieving optimality. 1. Introduction. A connected graph G = (V; E) is kvertex connected if it has at least (k + 1) vertices and removal of any (k \Gamma 1) vertices leaves the graph connected. Designing efficient algorithms for determining the connectivity of graphs has been a subject of great interest in the last two decades. Applications of graph connect...
The Complexity of Planarity Testing
, 2000
"... We clarify the computational complexity of planarity testing, by showing that planarity testing is hard for L, and lies in SL. This nearly settles the question, since it is widely conjectured that L = SL [25]. The upper bound of SL matches the lower bound of L in the context of (nonuniform) circ ..."
Abstract

Cited by 31 (8 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
We clarify the computational complexity of planarity testing, by showing that planarity testing is hard for L, and lies in SL. This nearly settles the question, since it is widely conjectured that L = SL [25]. The upper bound of SL matches the lower bound of L in the context of (nonuniform) circuit complexity, since L/poly is equal to SL/poly. Similarly, we show that a planar embedding, when one exists, can be found in FL SL . Previously, these problems were known to reside in the complexity class AC 1 , via a O(log n) time CRCW PRAM algorithm [22], although planarity checking for degreethree graphs had been shown to be in SL [23, 20].
Parallel Recognition of SeriesParallel Graphs
, 1992
"... Recently, He and Yesha gave an algorithm for recognizing directed series parallel graphs, in time O(log 2 n) with linearly many EREW processors. We give a new algorithm for this problem, based on a structural characterization of series parallel graphs in terms of their ear decompositions. Our ..."
Abstract

Cited by 29 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Recently, He and Yesha gave an algorithm for recognizing directed series parallel graphs, in time O(log 2 n) with linearly many EREW processors. We give a new algorithm for this problem, based on a structural characterization of series parallel graphs in terms of their ear decompositions. Our algorithm can recognize undirected as well as directed series parallel graphs. It can be implemented in the CRCW model of parallel computation to take time O(log n). In the EREW model the time is O(log 2 n) but the number of processors required improves the bounds of the previous algorithm. 1 Introduction A directed graph G is twoterminal series parallel, with terminals s and t, if it can be produced by a sequence of the following operations: 1. Create a new graph, consisting of a single edge directed from s to t. 2. Given two twoterminal series parallel graphs X and Y , with terminals s X , t X , s Y , and t Y , form a new graph G = P (X,Y ) by identifying s = s X = s Y and t = ...
Parallel Open Ear Decomposition with Applications to Graph Biconnectivity and Triconnectivity
 Synthesis of Parallel Algorithms
, 1992
"... This report deals with a parallel algorithmic technique that has proved to be very useful in the design of efficient parallel algorithms for several problems on undirected graphs. We describe this method for searching undirected graphs, called "open ear decomposition", and we relate thi ..."
Abstract

Cited by 26 (9 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
This report deals with a parallel algorithmic technique that has proved to be very useful in the design of efficient parallel algorithms for several problems on undirected graphs. We describe this method for searching undirected graphs, called "open ear decomposition", and we relate this decomposition to graph biconnectivity. We present an efficient parallel algorithm for finding this decomposition and we relate it to a sequential algorithm based on depthfirst search. We then apply open ear decomposition to obtain an efficient parallel algorithm for testing graph triconnectivity and for finding the triconnnected components of a graph.