Results 1 - 10
of
11
A comparative-advantage approach to government debt maturity’,
- The Journal of Finance
, 2015
"... Abstract We study optimal government debt maturity in a model where investors derive monetary services from holding riskless short-term securities. In a setting where the government is the only issuer of such riskless paper, it trades off the monetary premium associated with short-term debt against ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 27 (3 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract We study optimal government debt maturity in a model where investors derive monetary services from holding riskless short-term securities. In a setting where the government is the only issuer of such riskless paper, it trades off the monetary premium associated with short-term debt against the refinancing risk implied by the need to roll over its debt more often. We then extend the model to allow private financial intermediaries to compete with the government in the provision of short-term, money-like claims. We argue that if there are negative externalities associated with private money creation, the government should tilt its issuance more towards short maturities. The idea is that the government may have a comparative advantage relative to the private sector in bearing refinancing risk, and hence should aim to partially crowd out the private sector's use of short-term debt.
Financial Crises and the Politics of Adjustment and Reform Financial Crises and the Politics of Adjustment and Reform
"... ABSTRACT This chapter is a critical survey of the literature on international financial crises and their consequences for national politics, with a focus on national-level policy choices and political outcomes. After distinguishing conceptually among adjustment, reform, and political change as thre ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
ABSTRACT This chapter is a critical survey of the literature on international financial crises and their consequences for national politics, with a focus on national-level policy choices and political outcomes. After distinguishing conceptually among adjustment, reform, and political change as three broad families of political consequences to financial crises, it reviews three broad analytical approaches to the study of post-crisis political outcomes. Interest-based approaches center on the specific economic consequences of different kinds of financial crises, and look to policy outcomes as a consequence of the interaction between distributional pressures and national political-economic profiles. Institutional approaches address the ways in which institutions mediate the articulation of interest group pressures. Ideational approaches emphasize the constitutive power of ideas in making sense of financial crises. The concluding section identifies several promising areas for future research, highlighting in particular the importance of international context for conditioning the effects of international financial crises on domestic politics. It also highlights some general methodological problems with studying the highly complex economic and political consequences of financial crises.
A Service of zbw Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre for Economics The economic consequences of rising US government debt: privileges at risk
"... Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. The Economic Consequences of Rising U.S. Government Debt: Privileges at Risk Terms of use: Documents in EconStor may Abstract The rapidly growing federal government debt has become a concern for policy makers and the public. Yet the U.S. government has seemingly unbounded access to credit at low interest rates. Historically, Treasury yields have been below the growth rate of the economy. The paper examines the ramifications of debt financing at low interest rates. Given the short maturity of U.S. public debt -over $2.5 trillion maturing in 2010 -investor expectations are critical. Excessive debts justify reasonable doubts about solvency and monetary stability and thus undermine a financing strategy built on the perception that U.S. debt is safe. JEL-Code: H63, H62, E60.
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS Working Paper UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST Public debt, secular stagnation and functional finance Public debt, secular stagnation and functional finance
"... Abstract: Fiscal policy and public debt may be required to maintain full employment and avoid secular stagnation. This conclusion emerges from a range of different models, including OLG specifications and stock-flow consistent (post-) Keynesian models. One of the determinants of the required long-r ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract: Fiscal policy and public debt may be required to maintain full employment and avoid secular stagnation. This conclusion emerges from a range of different models, including OLG specifications and stock-flow consistent (post-) Keynesian models. One of the determinants of the required long-run debt ratio is the rate of economic growth. Low growth leads to high debt, and empirical correlations between growth and debt may reflect this causal effect of growth on debt, rather than negative effects of debt on growth. A second result relates directly to austerity policies. The level of government consumption and the structure of taxation influence the required debt ratio and, paradoxically, austerity policies are counterproductive on their own terms: cuts in government consumption lead to an increase in the required level of debt. JEL numbers:E62, E22
A Service of zbw Labor Market Policy: A Comparative View on the Costs and Benefi ts of Labor Market Flexibility Labor Market Policy: A Comparative View on the Costs and Benefits of Labor Market Flexibility ABSTRACT Labor Market Policy: A Comparative View
"... Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte.
No 06/2013 Public debt and changing inflation targets
"... Discussion Papers represent the authors ‘ personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Deutsche Bundesbank or its staff. Editorial Board: ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
Discussion Papers represent the authors ‘ personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Deutsche Bundesbank or its staff. Editorial Board:
By Soon Ryoo
"... Public debt and full employment in a stockflow consistent model of a corporate economy ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
Public debt and full employment in a stockflow consistent model of a corporate economy
The Fiscal Limit and Non-Ricardian Consumers ∗
, 2011
"... The U.S. federal government faces the prospect of exponentially rising entitlement obligations that threaten to push the debt-to-GDP ratio to historically unprecedented levels. I introduce a fiscal limit into a Perpetual Youth model to assess how intergenerational redistributions of wealth and the m ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
The U.S. federal government faces the prospect of exponentially rising entitlement obligations that threaten to push the debt-to-GDP ratio to historically unprecedented levels. I introduce a fiscal limit into a Perpetual Youth model to assess how intergenerational redistributions of wealth and the maturity structure of government debt impact the economic consequences of fiscal stress. Growing entitlement commitments require taking a stand on how future monetary and fiscal policies may adjust. When the economy hits its fiscal limit—the point at which increases in taxes are no longer feasible—either the fiscal authority must renege on its promised entitlement benefit or the monetary authority must adjust its policy to stabilize debt. I find that intergenerational transfers of wealth strengthen the expectational effects of the fiscal limit and magnify the likelihood of stagflation. A longer average maturity of government debt weakens these effects in the short and medium runs but still increases the risk of stagflation when taxes come due in the long-run. Dire scenarios never transpire, but delaying reform—legislation that places entitlement spending on a stable path—lengthens the stagflationary period.
GOVERNMENT DEBT MANAGEMENT AT THE ZERO LOWER BOUND
, 2014
"... This paper re-examines government debt management policy in light of the U.S. experience with extraordinary fiscal and monetary policies since 2008. We first document that the Treasury’s decision to lengthen the average maturity of the debt has partially offset the Federal Reserve’s attempts to redu ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
This paper re-examines government debt management policy in light of the U.S. experience with extraordinary fiscal and monetary policies since 2008. We first document that the Treasury’s decision to lengthen the average maturity of the debt has partially offset the Federal Reserve’s attempts to reduce the supply of long-term bonds held by private investors through its policy of quantitative easing. We then examine the appropriate debt management policy for the consolidated government. We argue that traditional considerations favoring longer-term debt may be overstated, and suggest that there are several advantages to issuing greater quantities of short-term debt. Under current institutional arrangements, neither the Federal Reserve nor the Treasury is caused to view debt management policy on the basis of the overall national interest. We suggest revised institutional arrangements to promote greater cooperation between the Treasury and the Federal Reserve in setting debt management policy. This is particularly important when conventional monetary policy becomes constrained by the zero lower bound, leaving debt management as one of the few policy levers to support aggregate demand.