We present the fusion calculus as a significant step towards a canonical calculus of concurrency. It simplifies and extends the π-calculus. The fusion calculus contains the polyadic π-calculus as a proper subcalculus and thus inherits all its expressive power. The gain is that fusion contains actions akin to updating a shared state, and a scoping construct for bounding their effects. Therefore it is easier to represent computational models such as concurrent constraints formalisms. It is also easy to represent the so called strong reduction strategies in the lambda-calculus, involving reduction under abstraction. In the π-calculus these tasks require elaborate encodings. The dramatic main point of this paper is that we achieve these improvements by simplifying the π-calculus rather than adding features to it. The fusion calculus has only one binding operator where the π-calculus has two (input and restriction). It has a complete symmetry between input and output actions where the π-calculus has not. There is only one sensible variety of bisimulation congruence where the pi-calculus has at least three (early, late and open). Proofs about the fusion calculus, for example in complete axiomatizations and full abstraction, therefore are shorter and clearer. Our results on the fusion calculus in this paper are the following. We give a structured operational semantics in the traditional style. The novelty lies in a new kind of action, fusion actions for emulating updates of a shared state. We prove that the calculus contains the π-calculus as a subcalculus. We define and motivate the bisimulation equivalence and prove a simple characterization of its induced congruence, which is given two versions of a complete axiomatization for finite terms. The expressive power of the calculus is demonstrated by giving a straight-forward encoding of the strong lazy lambda-calculus, which admits reduction under lambda abstraction.

The asynchronous pi-calculus is considered the basis of experimental programming languages (or proposal of programming languages) like Pict, Join, and Blue calculus. However, at a closer inspection, these languages are based on an even simpler calculus, called Local (L), where: (a) only the output capability of names may be transmitted; (b) there is no matching or similar constructs for testing equality between names. We study the basic operational and algebraic theory of Lpi. We focus on bisimulation-based behavioural equivalences, precisely on barbed congruence. We prove two coinductive characterisations of barbed congruence in Lpi, and some basic algebraic laws. We then show applications of this theory, including: the derivability of delayed input; the correctness of an optimisation of the encoding of call-by-name lambda-calculus; the validity of some laws for Join.

We obtain a new formalism for concurrent object-oriented languages by extending Abadi and Cardelli's imperative object calculus with operators for concurrency from the-calculus and with operators for synchronisation based on mutexes. Our syntax of terms is extremely expressive; in a precise sense it unifies notions of expression, process, store, thread, and configuration. We present a chemical-style reduction semantics, and prove it equivalent to a structural operational semantics. We identify a deterministic fragment that is closed under reduction and show that it includes the imperative object calculus. A collection of type systems for object-oriented constructs is at the heart of Abadi and Cardelli's work. We recast one of Abadi and Cardelli's first-order type systems with object types and subtyping in the setting of our calculus and prove subject reduction. Since our syntax of terms includes both stores and running expressions, we avoid the need to separate store typing from typing of expressions. We translate asynchronous communication channels and the choice-free asynchronous-calculus into our calculus to illustrate its expressiveness; the types of read-only and write-only channels are supertypes of read-write channels.

We propose a new type discipline for the -calculus in which secure information ow is guaranteed by static type checking. Secrecy levels are assigned to channels and are controlled by subtyping. A behavioural notion of types capturing causality of actions plays an essential role for ensuring safe information ow in diverse interactive behaviours, making the calculus powerful enough to embed known calculi for type-based security. The paper introduces the core part of the calculus, presents its basic syntactic properties, and illustrates its use as a tool for programming language analysis by a sound embedding of a secure multi-threaded imperative calculus of Volpano and Smith. The embedding leads to a practically meaningful extension of their original type discipline.

Functional nets combine key ideas of functional programming and Petri nets to yield a simple and general programming notation. They

We introduce a typed π-calculus where strong normalisation is ensured by typability. Strong normalisation is a useful property in many computational contexts, including distributed systems. In spite of its simplicity, our type discipline captures a wide class of converging name-passing interactive behaviour. The proof of strong normalisability combines methods from typed l-calculi and linear logic with process-theoretic reasoning. It is adaptable to systems involving state and other extensions. Strong normalisation is shown to have significant consequences, including finite axiomatisation of weak bisimilarity, a fully abstract embedding of the simply-typed l-calculus with products and sums and basic liveness in interaction.

We present a simple type discipline for the π-calculus which precisely captures the notion of sequential functional computation as a specific class of name passing interactive behaviour. The typed calculus allows direct interpretation of both call-by-name and call-by-value sequential functions. The precision of the representation is demonstrated by way of a fully abstract encoding of PCF.

We introduce a new lambda calculus with futures, λ(fut), to model the operational semantics of concurrent extensions of ML. λ(fut) can safely express a variety of high-level concurrency constructs, including channels, semaphores, or ports. Safe implementations of these constructs in (fut) cannot be corrupted in any well-typed context. We prove safety on basis of a linear type system.

Abstract not found

We propose a simple model of distribution for mobile processes, independent of the underlying calculus. Conventional processes compute within sites; inter-site computation is achieved by message sending and object migration, both obeying a lexical scope. We focus on the semantics of networks, on programming practice, and on physical realization with current technology.