Most information retrieval systems use stopword lists and stemming algorithms. However, we have found that recognizing singular and plural nouns, verb forms, negation, and prepositions can produce dramatically different text classification results. We present results from text classification experiments that compare relevancy signatures, which use local linguistic context, with corresponding indexing terms that do not. In two different domains, relevancy signatures produced better results than the simple indexing terms. These experiments suggest that stopword lists and stemming algorithms may remove or conflate many words that could be used to create more effective indexing terms. Introduction Most information retrieval systems use a stopword list to prevent common words from being used as indexing terms. Highly frequent words, such as determiners and prepositions, are not considered to be content words because they appear in virtually every document. Stopword lists are almost univer...