Results 1  10
of
134
Interiorpoint Methods
, 2000
"... The modern era of interiorpoint methods dates to 1984, when Karmarkar proposed his algorithm for linear programming. In the years since then, algorithms and software for linear programming have become quite sophisticated, while extensions to more general classes of problems, such as convex quadrati ..."
Abstract

Cited by 505 (17 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
The modern era of interiorpoint methods dates to 1984, when Karmarkar proposed his algorithm for linear programming. In the years since then, algorithms and software for linear programming have become quite sophisticated, while extensions to more general classes of problems, such as convex quadratic programming, semidefinite programming, and nonconvex and nonlinear problems, have reached varying levels of maturity. We review some of the key developments in the area, including comments on both the complexity theory and practical algorithms for linear programming, semidefinite programming, monotone linear complementarity, and convex programming over sets that can be characterized by selfconcordant barrier functions.
DETERMINANT MAXIMIZATION WITH LINEAR MATRIX INEQUALITY CONSTRAINTS
"... The problem of maximizing the determinant of a matrix subject to linear matrix inequalities arises in many fields, including computational geometry, statistics, system identification, experiment design, and information and communication theory. It can also be considered as a generalization of the s ..."
Abstract

Cited by 183 (18 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The problem of maximizing the determinant of a matrix subject to linear matrix inequalities arises in many fields, including computational geometry, statistics, system identification, experiment design, and information and communication theory. It can also be considered as a generalization of the semidefinite programming problem. We give an overview of the applications of the determinant maximization problem, pointing out simple cases where specialized algorithms or analytical solutions are known. We then describe an interiorpoint method, with a simplified analysis of the worstcase complexity and numerical results that indicate that the method is very efficient, both in theory and in practice. Compared to existing specialized algorithms (where they are available), the interiorpoint method will generally be slower; the advantage is that it handles a much wider variety of problems.
A unified approach to interior point algorithms for linear complementarity problems
 Lecture Notes in Computer Sciences, 538
, 1991
"... ..."
(Show Context)
Continuation and Path Following
, 1992
"... CONTENTS 1 Introduction 1 2 The Basics of PredictorCorrector Path Following 3 3 Aspects of Implementations 7 4 Applications 15 5 PiecewiseLinear Methods 34 6 Complexity 41 7 Available Software 44 References 48 1. Introduction Continuation, embedding or homotopy methods have long served as useful ..."
Abstract

Cited by 75 (6 self)
 Add to MetaCart
CONTENTS 1 Introduction 1 2 The Basics of PredictorCorrector Path Following 3 3 Aspects of Implementations 7 4 Applications 15 5 PiecewiseLinear Methods 34 6 Complexity 41 7 Available Software 44 References 48 1. Introduction Continuation, embedding or homotopy methods have long served as useful theoretical tools in modern mathematics. Their use can be traced back at least to such venerated works as those of Poincar'e (18811886), Klein (1882 1883) and Bernstein (1910). Leray and Schauder (1934) refined the tool and presented it as a global result in topology, viz., the homotopy invariance of degree. The use of deformations to solve nonlinear systems of equations Partially supported by the National Science Foundation via grant # DMS9104058 y Preprint, Colorado State University, August 2 E. Allgower and K. Georg may be traced back at least to Lahaye (1934). The classical embedding methods were the
A Cutting Plane Method from Analytic Centers for Stochastic Programming
 Mathematical Programming
, 1994
"... The stochastic linear programming problem with recourse has a dual block angular structure. It can thus be handled by Benders decomposition or by Kelley's method of cutting planes; equivalently the dual problem has a primal block angular structure and can be handled by DantzigWolfe decompositi ..."
Abstract

Cited by 52 (18 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
The stochastic linear programming problem with recourse has a dual block angular structure. It can thus be handled by Benders decomposition or by Kelley's method of cutting planes; equivalently the dual problem has a primal block angular structure and can be handled by DantzigWolfe decomposition the two approaches are in fact identical by duality. Here we shall investigate the use of the method of cutting planes from analytic centers applied to similar formulations. The only significant difference form the aforementioned methods is that new cutting planes (or columns, by duality) will be generated not from the optimum of the linear programming relaxation, but from the analytic center of the set of localization. 1 Introduction The study of optimization problems in the presence of uncertainty still taxes the limits of methodology and software. One of the most approachable settings is that of twostaged planning under uncertainty, in which a first stage decision has to be taken bef...
HOMOTOPY CONTINUATION METHODS FOR NONLINEAR COMPLEMENTARITY PROBLEMS
, 1991
"... A complementarity problem with a continuous mapping f from Rn into itself can be written as the system of equations F(x, y) = 0 and (x, y)> 0. Here F is the mapping from R ~ " into itself defined by F(x, y) = ( xl y,, x2yZ,..., x, ~ ye, y ffx)). Under the assumption that the mapping f is ..."
Abstract

Cited by 36 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
A complementarity problem with a continuous mapping f from Rn into itself can be written as the system of equations F(x, y) = 0 and (x, y)> 0. Here F is the mapping from R ~ " into itself defined by F(x, y) = ( xl y,, x2yZ,..., x, ~ ye, y ffx)). Under the assumption that the mapping f is a P,,function, we study various aspects of homotopy continuation methods that trace a trajectory consisting of solutions of the family of systems of equations F(x, y) = t(a, b) and (x, y) 8 0 until the parameter t> 0 attains 0. Here (a, b) denotes a 2ndimensional constant positive vector. We establish the existence of a trajectory which leads to a solution of the problem, and then present a numerical method for tracing the trajectory. We also discuss the global and local convergence of the method.
PrimalDual TargetFollowing Algorithms for Linear Programming
 ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH
, 1993
"... In this paper we propose a method for linear programming with the property that, starting from an initial noncentral point, it generates iterates that simultaneously get closer to optimality and closer to centrality. The iterates follow paths that in the limit are tangential to the central path. Al ..."
Abstract

Cited by 26 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
In this paper we propose a method for linear programming with the property that, starting from an initial noncentral point, it generates iterates that simultaneously get closer to optimality and closer to centrality. The iterates follow paths that in the limit are tangential to the central path. Along with the convergence analysis we provide a general framework which enables us to analyze various primaldual algorithms in the literature in a short and uniform way.
Boundary Behavior Of Interior Point Algorithms In Linear Programming
"... This paper studies the boundary behavior of some interior point algorithms for linear programming. The algorithms considered are Karmarkar's projective rescaling algorithm, the linear rescaling algorithm whichwas proposed as a variation on Karmarkar's algorithm, and the logarithmic barrier ..."
Abstract

Cited by 24 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
This paper studies the boundary behavior of some interior point algorithms for linear programming. The algorithms considered are Karmarkar's projective rescaling algorithm, the linear rescaling algorithm whichwas proposed as a variation on Karmarkar's algorithm, and the logarithmic barrier technique. The study includes both the continuous trajectories of the vector fields induced by these algorithms and also the discrete orbits. It is shown that, although the algorithms are defined on the interior of the feasible polyhedron, they actually determine differentiable vector fields on the closed polyhedron. Conditions are given under whichavector field gives rise to trajectories that each visit the neighborhoods of all the vertices of the KleeMinty cube. The linear rescaling algorithm satisfies these conditions. Thus, limits of such trajectories, obtained when a starting point is pushed to the boundary, may have an exponential number of breakpoints. It is shown that limits of projective rescaling trajectories mayhave only a linear number of such breakpoints. It is however shown that projective rescaling trajectories may visit the neighborhoods of linearly many vertices. The behavior of the linear rescaling algorithm near vertices is analyzed. It is shown that all the trajectories have a unique asymptotic direction of convergence to the optimum.