Results 1  10
of
119
Interiorpoint Methods
, 2000
"... The modern era of interiorpoint methods dates to 1984, when Karmarkar proposed his algorithm for linear programming. In the years since then, algorithms and software for linear programming have become quite sophisticated, while extensions to more general classes of problems, such as convex quadrati ..."
Abstract

Cited by 463 (16 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The modern era of interiorpoint methods dates to 1984, when Karmarkar proposed his algorithm for linear programming. In the years since then, algorithms and software for linear programming have become quite sophisticated, while extensions to more general classes of problems, such as convex quadratic programming, semidefinite programming, and nonconvex and nonlinear problems, have reached varying levels of maturity. We review some of the key developments in the area, including comments on both the complexity theory and practical algorithms for linear programming, semidefinite programming, monotone linear complementarity, and convex programming over sets that can be characterized by selfconcordant barrier functions.
LOQO: An interior point code for quadratic programming
, 1994
"... ABSTRACT. This paper describes a software package, called LOQO, which implements a primaldual interiorpoint method for general nonlinear programming. We focus in this paper mainly on the algorithm as it applies to linear and quadratic programming with only brief mention of the extensions to convex ..."
Abstract

Cited by 156 (9 self)
 Add to MetaCart
ABSTRACT. This paper describes a software package, called LOQO, which implements a primaldual interiorpoint method for general nonlinear programming. We focus in this paper mainly on the algorithm as it applies to linear and quadratic programming with only brief mention of the extensions to convex and general nonlinear programming, since a detailed paper describing these extensions were published recently elsewhere. In particular, we emphasize the importance of establishing and maintaining symmetric quasidefiniteness of the reduced KKT system. We show that the industry standard MPS format can be nicely formulated in such a way to provide quasidefiniteness. Computational results are included for a variety of linear and quadratic programming problems. 1.
A Unified Approach to Interior Point Algorithms for Linear Complementarity Problems: A Summary
 Research ReportRJ7493 (70008), IBM Almaden Research Center
, 1990
"... This note summarizes a report with the same title, where a study was carried out regarding a unified approach, proposed by Kojima, Mizuno and Yoshise, for interior point algorithms for the linear complementarily problem with a positive semidefinite matrix. This approach is extended to nonsymmetri ..."
Abstract

Cited by 146 (8 self)
 Add to MetaCart
This note summarizes a report with the same title, where a study was carried out regarding a unified approach, proposed by Kojima, Mizuno and Yoshise, for interior point algorithms for the linear complementarily problem with a positive semidefinite matrix. This approach is extended to nonsymmetric matrices with nonnegative principal minors.
The Mathematics Of Eigenvalue Optimization
, 2003
"... Optimization problems involving the eigenvalues of symmetric and nonsymmetric matrices present a fascinating mathematical challenge. Such problems arise often in theory and practice, particularly in engineering design, and are amenable to a rich blend of classical mathematical techniques and contemp ..."
Abstract

Cited by 92 (13 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Optimization problems involving the eigenvalues of symmetric and nonsymmetric matrices present a fascinating mathematical challenge. Such problems arise often in theory and practice, particularly in engineering design, and are amenable to a rich blend of classical mathematical techniques and contemporary optimization theory. This essay presents a personal choice of some central mathematical ideas, outlined for the broad optimization community. I discuss the convex analysis of spectral functions and invariant matrix norms, touching briey on semide nite representability, and then outlining two broader algebraic viewpoints based on hyperbolic polynomials and Lie algebra. Analogous nonconvex notions lead into eigenvalue perturbation theory. The last third of the article concerns stability, for polynomials, matrices, and associated dynamical systems, ending with a section on robustness. The powerful and elegant language of nonsmooth analysis appears throughout, as a unifying narrative thread.
Interior Methods for Constrained Optimization
 Acta Numerica
, 1992
"... Interior methods for optimization were widely used in the 1960s, primarily in the form of barrier methods. However, they were not seriously applied to linear programming because of the dominance of the simplex method. Barrier methods fell from favour during the 1970s for a variety of reasons, includ ..."
Abstract

Cited by 83 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Interior methods for optimization were widely used in the 1960s, primarily in the form of barrier methods. However, they were not seriously applied to linear programming because of the dominance of the simplex method. Barrier methods fell from favour during the 1970s for a variety of reasons, including their apparent inefficiency compared with the best available alternatives. In 1984, Karmarkar's announcement of a fast polynomialtime interior method for linear programming caused tremendous excitement in the field of optimization. A formal connection can be shown between his method and classical barrier methods, which have consequently undergone a renaissance in interest and popularity. Most papers published since 1984 have concentrated on issues of computational complexity in interior methods for linear programming. During the same period, implementations of interior methods have displayed great efficiency in solving many large linear programs of everincreasing size. Interior methods...
Interior methods for nonlinear optimization
 SIAM Review
, 2002
"... Abstract. Interior methods are an omnipresent, conspicuous feature of the constrained optimization landscape today, but it was not always so. Primarily in the form of barrier methods, interiorpoint techniques were popular during the 1960s for solving nonlinearly constrained problems. However, their ..."
Abstract

Cited by 76 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. Interior methods are an omnipresent, conspicuous feature of the constrained optimization landscape today, but it was not always so. Primarily in the form of barrier methods, interiorpoint techniques were popular during the 1960s for solving nonlinearly constrained problems. However, their use for linear programming was not even contemplated because of the total dominance of the simplex method. Vague but continuing anxiety about barrier methods eventually led to their abandonment in favor of newly emerging, apparently more efficient alternatives such as augmented Lagrangian and sequential quadratic programming methods. By the early 1980s, barrier methods were almost without exception regarded as a closed chapter in the history of optimization. This picture changed dramatically with Karmarkarâ€™s widely publicized announcement in 1984 of a fast polynomialtime interior method for linear programming; in 1985, a formal connection was established between his method and classical barrier methods. Since then, interior methods have advanced so far, so fast, that their influence has transformed both the theory and practice of constrained optimization. This article provides a condensed, selective look at classical material and recent research about interior methods for nonlinearly constrained optimization.
Implementation of Interior Point Methods for Large Scale Linear Programming
 in Interior Point Methods in Mathematical Programming
, 1996
"... In the past 10 years the interior point methods (IPM) for linear programming have gained extraordinary interest as an alternative to the sparse simplex based methods. This has initiated a fruitful competition between the two types of algorithms which has lead to very efficient implementations on bot ..."
Abstract

Cited by 70 (22 self)
 Add to MetaCart
In the past 10 years the interior point methods (IPM) for linear programming have gained extraordinary interest as an alternative to the sparse simplex based methods. This has initiated a fruitful competition between the two types of algorithms which has lead to very efficient implementations on both sides. The significant difference between interior point and simplex based methods is reflected not only in the theoretical background but also in the practical implementation. In this paper we give an overview of the most important characteristics of advanced implementations of interior point methods. First, we present the infeasibleprimaldual algorithm which is widely considered the most efficient general purpose IPM. Our discussion includes various algorithmic enhancements of the basic algorithm. The only shortcoming of the "traditional" infeasibleprimaldual algorithm is to detect a possible primal or dual infeasibility of the linear program. We discuss how this problem can be solve...
Continuation and Path Following
, 1992
"... CONTENTS 1 Introduction 1 2 The Basics of PredictorCorrector Path Following 3 3 Aspects of Implementations 7 4 Applications 15 5 PiecewiseLinear Methods 34 6 Complexity 41 7 Available Software 44 References 48 1. Introduction Continuation, embedding or homotopy methods have long served as useful ..."
Abstract

Cited by 70 (6 self)
 Add to MetaCart
CONTENTS 1 Introduction 1 2 The Basics of PredictorCorrector Path Following 3 3 Aspects of Implementations 7 4 Applications 15 5 PiecewiseLinear Methods 34 6 Complexity 41 7 Available Software 44 References 48 1. Introduction Continuation, embedding or homotopy methods have long served as useful theoretical tools in modern mathematics. Their use can be traced back at least to such venerated works as those of Poincar'e (18811886), Klein (1882 1883) and Bernstein (1910). Leray and Schauder (1934) refined the tool and presented it as a global result in topology, viz., the homotopy invariance of degree. The use of deformations to solve nonlinear systems of equations Partially supported by the National Science Foundation via grant # DMS9104058 y Preprint, Colorado State University, August 2 E. Allgower and K. Georg may be traced back at least to Lahaye (1934). The classical embedding methods were the
Primaldual interior methods for nonconvex nonlinear programming
 SIAM Journal on Optimization
, 1998
"... Abstract. This paper concerns largescale general (nonconvex) nonlinear programming when first and second derivatives of the objective and constraint functions are available. A method is proposed that is based on finding an approximate solution of a sequence of unconstrained subproblems parameterize ..."
Abstract

Cited by 59 (5 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. This paper concerns largescale general (nonconvex) nonlinear programming when first and second derivatives of the objective and constraint functions are available. A method is proposed that is based on finding an approximate solution of a sequence of unconstrained subproblems parameterized by a scalar parameter. The objective function of each unconstrained subproblem is an augmented penaltybarrier function that involves both primal and dual variables. Each subproblem is solved with a modified Newton method that generates search directions from a primaldual system similar to that proposed for interior methods. The augmented penaltybarrier function may be interpreted as a merit function for values of the primal and dual variables. An inertiacontrolling symmetric indefinite factorization is used to provide descent directions and directions of negative curvature for the augmented penaltybarrier merit function. A method suitable for large problems can be obtained by providing a version of this factorization that will treat large sparse indefinite systems.
Multiple Centrality Corrections in a PrimalDual Method for Linear Programming
 COMPUTATIONAL OPTIMIZATION AND APPLICATIONS
, 1995
"... A modification of the (infeasible) primaldual interior point method is developed. The method uses multiple corrections to improve the centrality of the current iterate. The maximum number of corrections the algorithm is encouraged to make depends on the ratio of the efforts to solve and to factoriz ..."
Abstract

Cited by 48 (11 self)
 Add to MetaCart
A modification of the (infeasible) primaldual interior point method is developed. The method uses multiple corrections to improve the centrality of the current iterate. The maximum number of corrections the algorithm is encouraged to make depends on the ratio of the efforts to solve and to factorize the KKT systems. For any LP problem, this ratio is determined right after preprocessing the KKT system and prior to the optimization process. The harder the factorization, the more advantageous the higherorder corrections might prove to be. The computational performance of the method is studied on more difficult Netlib problems as well as on tougher and larger reallife LP models arising from applications. The use of multiple centrality corrections gives on the average a 25% to 40% reduction in the number of iterations compared with the widely used secondorder predictorcorrector method. This translates into 20% to 30% savings in CPU time.