Results 1  10
of
123
Dynamic Programming for Partially Observable Stochastic Games
 IN PROCEEDINGS OF THE NINETEENTH NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
, 2004
"... We develop an exact dynamic programming algorithm for partially observable stochastic games (POSGs). The algorithm is a synthesis of dynamic programming for partially observable Markov decision processes (POMDPs) and iterated elimination of dominated strategies in normal form games. ..."
Abstract

Cited by 119 (23 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We develop an exact dynamic programming algorithm for partially observable stochastic games (POSGs). The algorithm is a synthesis of dynamic programming for partially observable Markov decision processes (POMDPs) and iterated elimination of dominated strategies in normal form games.
Cooperative MultiAgent Learning: The State of the Art
 Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems
, 2005
"... Cooperative multiagent systems are ones in which several agents attempt, through their interaction, to jointly solve tasks or to maximize utility. Due to the interactions among the agents, multiagent problem complexity can rise rapidly with the number of agents or their behavioral sophistication. ..."
Abstract

Cited by 113 (6 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Cooperative multiagent systems are ones in which several agents attempt, through their interaction, to jointly solve tasks or to maximize utility. Due to the interactions among the agents, multiagent problem complexity can rise rapidly with the number of agents or their behavioral sophistication. The challenge this presents to the task of programming solutions to multiagent systems problems has spawned increasing interest in machine learning techniques to automate the search and optimization process. We provide a broad survey of the cooperative multiagent learning literature. Previous surveys of this area have largely focused on issues common to specific subareas (for example, reinforcement learning or robotics). In this survey we attempt to draw from multiagent learning work in a spectrum of areas, including reinforcement learning, evolutionary computation, game theory, complex systems, agent modeling, and robotics. We find that this broad view leads to a division of the work into two categories, each with its own special issues: applying a single learner to discover joint solutions to multiagent problems (team learning), or using multiple simultaneous learners, often one per agent (concurrent learning). Additionally, we discuss direct and indirect communication in connection with learning, plus open issues in task decomposition, scalability, and adaptive dynamics. We conclude with a presentation of multiagent learning problem domains, and a list of multiagent learning resources. 1
Solving transition independent decentralized Markov decision processes
 JAIR
, 2004
"... Formal treatment of collaborative multiagent systems has been lagging behind the rapid progress in sequential decision making by individual agents. Recent work in the area of decentralized Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) has contributed to closing this gap, but the computational complexity of thes ..."
Abstract

Cited by 74 (11 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Formal treatment of collaborative multiagent systems has been lagging behind the rapid progress in sequential decision making by individual agents. Recent work in the area of decentralized Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) has contributed to closing this gap, but the computational complexity of these models remains a serious obstacle. To overcome this complexity barrier, we identify a specific class of decentralized MDPs in which the agents ’ transitions are independent. The class consists of independent collaborating agents that are tied together through a structured global reward function that depends on all of their histories of states and actions. We present a novel algorithm for solving this class of problems and examine its properties, both as an optimal algorithm and as an anytime algorithm. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first algorithm to optimally solve a nontrivial subclass of decentralized MDPs. It lays the foundation for further work in this area on both exact and approximate algorithms. 1.
Approximate Solutions for Partially Observable Stochastic Games with Common Payoffs
 In Proc. of Int. Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi Agent Systems
, 2004
"... Partially observable decentralized decision making in robot teams is fundamentally different from decision making in fully observable problems. Team members cannot simply apply singleagent solution techniques in parallel. Instead, we must turn to game theoretic frameworks to correctly model the pro ..."
Abstract

Cited by 73 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Partially observable decentralized decision making in robot teams is fundamentally different from decision making in fully observable problems. Team members cannot simply apply singleagent solution techniques in parallel. Instead, we must turn to game theoretic frameworks to correctly model the problem. While partially observable stochastic games (POSGs) provide a solution model for decentralized robot teams, this model quickly becomes intractable. We propose an algorithm that approximates POSGs as a series of smaller, related Bayesian games, using heuristics such as QMDP to provide the future discounted value of actions. This algorithm trades off limited lookahead in uncertainty for computational feasibility, and results in policies that are locally optimal with respect to the selected heuristic. Empirical results are provided for both a simple problem for which the full POSG can also be constructed, as well as more complex, robotinspired, problems.
Decentralized control of cooperative systems: Categorization and complexity analysis
 Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
, 2004
"... Decentralized control of cooperative systems captures the operation of a group of decisionmakers that share a single global objective. The difficulty in solving optimally such problems arises when the agents lack full observability of the global state of the system when they operate. The general pr ..."
Abstract

Cited by 68 (8 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Decentralized control of cooperative systems captures the operation of a group of decisionmakers that share a single global objective. The difficulty in solving optimally such problems arises when the agents lack full observability of the global state of the system when they operate. The general problem has been shown to be NEXPcomplete. In this paper, we identify classes of decentralized control problems whose complexity ranges between NEXP and P. In particular, we study problems characterized by independent transitions, independent observations, and goaloriented objective functions. Two algorithms are shown to solve optimally useful classes of goaloriented decentralized processes in polynomial time. This paper also studies information sharing among the decisionmakers, which can improve their performance. We distinguish between three ways in which agents can exchange information: indirect communication, direct communication and sharing state features that are not controlled by the agents. Our analysis shows that for every class of problems we consider, introducing direct or indirect communication does not change the worstcase complexity. The results provide a better understanding of the complexity of decentralized control problems that arise in practice and facilitate the development of planning algorithms for these problems. 1.
MAA*: A heuristic search algorithm for solving decentralized POMDPs
 In Proceedings of the TwentyFirst Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence
, 2005
"... We present multiagent A * (MAA*), the first complete and optimal heuristic search algorithm for solving decentralized partiallyobservable Markov decision problems (DECPOMDPs) with finite horizon. The algorithm is suitable for computing optimal plans for a cooperative group of agents that operate i ..."
Abstract

Cited by 68 (20 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We present multiagent A * (MAA*), the first complete and optimal heuristic search algorithm for solving decentralized partiallyobservable Markov decision problems (DECPOMDPs) with finite horizon. The algorithm is suitable for computing optimal plans for a cooperative group of agents that operate in a stochastic environment such as multirobot coordination, network traffic control, or distributed resource allocation. Solving such problems effectively is a major challenge in the area of planning under uncertainty. Our solution is based on a synthesis of classical heuristic search and decentralized control theory. Experimental results show that MAA * has significant advantages. We introduce an anytime variant of MAA * and conclude with a discussion of promising extensions such as an approach to solving infinite horizon problems. 1
Networked Distributed POMDPs: A Synthesis of Distributed Constraint Optimization and POMDPs
, 2005
"... In many realworld multiagent applications such as distributed sensor nets, a network of agents is formed based on each agent’s limited interactions with a small number of neighbors. While distributed POMDPs capture the realworld uncertainty in multiagent domains, they fail to exploit such locality ..."
Abstract

Cited by 64 (14 self)
 Add to MetaCart
In many realworld multiagent applications such as distributed sensor nets, a network of agents is formed based on each agent’s limited interactions with a small number of neighbors. While distributed POMDPs capture the realworld uncertainty in multiagent domains, they fail to exploit such locality of interaction. Distributed constraint optimization (DCOP) captures the locality of interaction but fails to capture planning under uncertainty. This paper present a new model synthesized from distributed POMDPs and DCOPs, called Networked Distributed POMDPs (NDPOMDPs). Exploiting network structure enables us to present two novel algorithms for NDPOMDPs: a distributed policy generation algorithm that performs local search and a systematic policy search that is guaranteed to reach the global optimal.
Improved memorybounded dynamic programming for decentralized POMDPs
 In Proceedings of the TwentyThird Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence
, 2007
"... Decentralized decision making under uncertainty has been shown to be intractable when each agent has different partial information about the domain. Thus, improving the applicability and scalability of planning algorithms is an important challenge. We present the first memorybounded dynamic program ..."
Abstract

Cited by 61 (20 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Decentralized decision making under uncertainty has been shown to be intractable when each agent has different partial information about the domain. Thus, improving the applicability and scalability of planning algorithms is an important challenge. We present the first memorybounded dynamic programming algorithm for finitehorizon decentralized POMDPs. A set of heuristics is used to identify relevant points of the infinitely large belief space. Using these belief points, the algorithm successively selects the best joint policies for each horizon. The algorithm is extremely efficient, having linear time and space complexity with respect to the horizon length. Experimental results show that it can handle horizons that are multiple orders of magnitude larger than what was previously possible, while achieving the same or better solution quality. These results significantly increase the applicability of decentralized decisionmaking techniques. 1
Bounded Policy Iteration for Decentralized POMDPs
 In Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
, 2005
"... We present a bounded policy iteration algorithm for infinitehorizon decentralized POMDPs. Policies are represented as joint stochastic finitestate controllers, which consist of a local controller for each agent. We also let a joint controller include a correlation device that allows the agents to ..."
Abstract

Cited by 58 (20 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We present a bounded policy iteration algorithm for infinitehorizon decentralized POMDPs. Policies are represented as joint stochastic finitestate controllers, which consist of a local controller for each agent. We also let a joint controller include a correlation device that allows the agents to correlate their behavior without exchanging information during execution, and show that this leads to improved performance. The algorithm uses a fixed amount of memory, and each iteration is guaranteed to produce a controller with value at least as high as the previous one for all possible initial state distributions. For the case of a single agent, the algorithm reduces to Poupart and Boutilier’s bounded policy iteration for POMDPs. 1