Contents 1 Introduction 2 1.1 Notations and Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2 Problem Formulations 4 2.1 Integer Programming Formulations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.2 Continuous Formulations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 3 Computational Complexity 12 4 Bounds and Estimates 15 5 Exact Algorithms 19 5.1 Enumerative Algorithms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 5.2 Exact Algorithms for the Unweighted Case . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 5.3 Exact Algorithms for the Weighted Case . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 6 Heuristics 27 6.1 Sequential Greedy Heuristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 6.2 Local Search Heuristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 6.3 Advanced Search Heuristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 6.3.1 Simulated annealing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 6.3.2 Neural networks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

We present an algorithm that constructively produces a solution to the k-dominating set problem for planar graphs in time O(c . To obtain this result, we show that the treewidth of a planar graph with domination number (G) is O( (G)), and that such a tree decomposition can be found in O( (G)n) time. The same technique can be used to show that the k-face cover problem ( find a size k set of faces that cover all vertices of a given plane graph) can be solved in O(c n) time, where c 1 = 3 and k is the size of the face cover set. Similar results can be obtained in the planar case for some variants of k-dominating set, e.g., k-independent dominating set and k-weighted dominating set.

Abstract not found

this paper, we address the issue of implementing matrix multiplication on heterogeneous platforms. We target two different classes of heterogeneous computing resources: heterogeneous networks of workstations and collections of heterogeneous clusters. Intuitively, the problem is to load balance the work with different speed resources while minimizing the communication volume. We formally state this problem in a geometric framework and prove its NP-completeness. Next, we introduce a (polynomial) column-based heuristic, which turns out to be very satisfactory: We derive a theoretical performance guarantee for the heuristic and we assess its practical usefulness through MPI experiments

Dealing with the NP-complete Dominating Set problem on graphs, we demonstrate the power of data reduction by preprocessing from a theoretical as well as a practical side. In particular, we prove that Dominating Set restricted to planar graphs has a so-called problem kernel of linear size, achieved by two simple and easy to implement reduction rules. Moreover, having implemented our reduction rules, first experiments indicate the impressive practical potential of these rules. Thus, this work seems to open up a new and prospective way how to cope with one of the most important problems in graph theory and combinatorial optimization.

We provide several non-approximability results for deterministic scheduling problems whose objective is to minimize the total job completion time. Unless P = NP, none of the problems under consideration can be approximated in polynomial time within arbitrarily good precision. Most of our results are derived by APX-hardness proofs. We show that, whereas scheduling on unrelated machines with unit weights is polynomially solvable, the problem becomes APX-hard if release dates or weights are added. We further show APX-hardness for scheduling in flow shops, job shops, and open shops. We also investigate the problems of scheduling on parallel machines with precedence constraints and unit processing times, and two variants of the latter problem with unit communication delays; for these problems we provide lower bounds on the worst-case behavior of any polynomial-time approximation algorithm through the gap reduction technique.

We present an algorithm that constructively produces a solution to the k-dominating set problem for planar graphs in time O(c √ kn), where c = 36√34. To obtain this result, we show that the treewidth of a planar graph with domination number γ(G) is O ( � γ(G)), and that such a tree decomposition can be found in O ( � γ(G)n) time. The same technique can be used to show that the k-face cover problem (find a size k set of faces that cover all vertices of a given plane graph) can be solved √ k in O(c1 n + n2) time, where c1 = 236√34 and k is the size of the face cover set. Similar results can be obtained in the planar case for some variants of k-dominating set, e.g., k-independent dominating set and k-weighted dominating set. Keywords. NP-complete problems, fixed parameter tractability, planar graphs, planar dominating set, face cover, outerplanarity, treewidth.

The goal of this article is to provide a tourist guide, with an eye towards structural issues, to what I consider some of the major highlights of parameterized complexity.

In this paper, we consider steady-state scheduling techniques for heterogeneous systems, such as clusters and grids. We advocate the use of steady-state scheduling to solve a variety of important problems, which would be too difficult to tackle with the objective of makespan minimization. We give a few successful examples before discussing the main limitations of the approach.

In this paper, we discuss several algorithms for scheduling divisible loads on heterogeneous systems. Our main contributions are (i) new optimality results for single-round algorithms and (ii) the design of an asymptotically optimal multi-round algorithm. This multi-round algorithm automatically performs resource selection, a difficult task that was previously left to the user. Because it is periodic, it is simpler to implement, and more robust to changes in the speeds of processors or communication links. On the theoretical side, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first published result assessing the absolute performance of a multiround algorithm. On the practical side, extensive simulations reveal that our multi-round algorithm outperforms existing solutions on a large variety of platforms, especially when the communication-to-computation ratio is not very high (the difficult case).