Results 1  10
of
49
Quantum categories, star autonomy, and quantum groupoids
 in &quot;Galois Theory, Hopf Algebras, and Semiabelian Categories&quot;, Fields Institute Communications 43 (American Math. Soc
, 2004
"... Abstract A useful general concept of bialgebroid seems to be resolving itself in recent publications; we give a treatment in terms of modules and enriched categories. Generalizing this concept, we define the term "quantum category"in a braided monoidal category with equalizers dist ..."
Abstract

Cited by 39 (13 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract A useful general concept of bialgebroid seems to be resolving itself in recent publications; we give a treatment in terms of modules and enriched categories. Generalizing this concept, we define the term &quot;quantum category&quot;in a braided monoidal category with equalizers distributed over by tensoring with an object. The definition of antipode for a bialgebroid is less resolved in the literature. Our suggestion is that the kind of dualization occurring in Barr's starautonomous categories is more suitable than autonomy ( = compactness = rigidity). This leads to our definition of quantum groupoid intended as a &quot;Hopf algebra with several objects&quot;. 1.
MONADS AND COMONADS ON MODULE CATEGORIES
"... known in module theory that any Abimodule B is an Aring if and only if the functor − ⊗A B: MA → MA is a monad (or triple). Similarly, an Abimodule C is an Acoring provided the functor − ⊗A C: MA → MA is a comonad (or cotriple). The related categories of modules (or algebras) of − ⊗A B and comodu ..."
Abstract

Cited by 24 (13 self)
 Add to MetaCart
known in module theory that any Abimodule B is an Aring if and only if the functor − ⊗A B: MA → MA is a monad (or triple). Similarly, an Abimodule C is an Acoring provided the functor − ⊗A C: MA → MA is a comonad (or cotriple). The related categories of modules (or algebras) of − ⊗A B and comodules (or coalgebras) of − ⊗A C are well studied in the literature. On the other hand, the right adjoint endofunctors HomA(B, −) and HomA(C, −) are a comonad and a monad, respectively, but the corresponding (co)module categories did not find
The monoidal EilenbergMoore construction and bialgebroids
"... Abstract. Monoidal functors U: C → M with left adjoints determine, in a universal way, monoids T in the category of oplax monoidal endofunctors on ”quantum groupoids ” we derive Tannaka duality between left adjointable monoidal functors and bimonads. Bialgebroids, i.e., Takeuchi’s ×Rbialgebras, app ..."
Abstract

Cited by 22 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract. Monoidal functors U: C → M with left adjoints determine, in a universal way, monoids T in the category of oplax monoidal endofunctors on ”quantum groupoids ” we derive Tannaka duality between left adjointable monoidal functors and bimonads. Bialgebroids, i.e., Takeuchi’s ×Rbialgebras, appear as the special case when T has also a right adjoint. Street’s 2category of monads then leads to a natural definition of the 2category of bialgebroids. Contents
Adjointable monoidal functors and quantum groupoids, Hopf algebras in noncommutative geometry and physics
 Lecture Notes in Pure and
"... Abstract. Every monoidal functor G: C → M has a canonical factorization through the category RMR of bimodules in M over some monoid R in M in which the factor U: C → RMR is strongly unital. Using this result and the characterization of the forgetful functors MA → RMR of bialgebroids A over R given b ..."
Abstract

Cited by 22 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract. Every monoidal functor G: C → M has a canonical factorization through the category RMR of bimodules in M over some monoid R in M in which the factor U: C → RMR is strongly unital. Using this result and the characterization of the forgetful functors MA → RMR of bialgebroids A over R given by Schauenburg [15] together with their bimonad description given by the author in [18] here we characterize the ”long ” forgetful functors MA → RMR → M of both bialgebroids and weak bialgebras. 1.
GALOIS FUNCTORS AND ENTWINING STRUCTURES
, 909
"... Abstract. Galois comodules over a coring can be characterised by properties of the relative injective comodules. They motivated the definition of Galois functors over some comonad (or monad) on any category and in the first section of the present paper we investigate the role of the relative injecti ..."
Abstract

Cited by 10 (7 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. Galois comodules over a coring can be characterised by properties of the relative injective comodules. They motivated the definition of Galois functors over some comonad (or monad) on any category and in the first section of the present paper we investigate the role of the relative injectives (projectives) in this context. Then we generalise the notion of corings (derived from an entwining of an algebra and a coalgebra) to the entwining of a monad and a comonad. Hereby a key role is played by the notion of a grouplike natural transformation g: I → G generalising the grouplike elements in corings. We apply the evolving theory to Hopf monads on arbitrary categories, and to comonoidal functors on monoidal categories in the sense of A. Bruguières and A. Virelizier. As wellknow, for any set G the product G × − defines an endofunctor on the category of sets and this is a Hopf monad if and only if G allows for a group structure. In the final section the elements of this case are generalised to arbitrary categories with finite products leading to Galois objects in the sense of Chase and Sweedler.
Closed categories, starautonomy, and monoidal comonads
 J. Algebra
"... Abstract. This paper determines what structure is needed for internal homs ..."
Abstract

Cited by 9 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract. This paper determines what structure is needed for internal homs