Results 1  10
of
77
The WellFounded Semantics for General Logic Programs
 Journal of the ACM
, 1991
"... ..."
(Show Context)
Complexity and Expressive Power of Logic Programming
, 1997
"... This paper surveys various complexity results on different forms of logic programming. The main focus is on decidable forms of logic programming, in particular, propositional logic programming and datalog, but we also mention general logic programming with function symbols. Next to classical results ..."
Abstract

Cited by 299 (56 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
This paper surveys various complexity results on different forms of logic programming. The main focus is on decidable forms of logic programming, in particular, propositional logic programming and datalog, but we also mention general logic programming with function symbols. Next to classical results on plain logic programming (pure Horn clause programs), more recent results on various important extensions of logic programming are surveyed. These include logic programming with different forms of negation, disjunctive logic programming, logic programming with equality, and constraint logic programming. The complexity of the unification problem is also addressed.
Splitting a Logic Program
 Principles of Knowledge Representation
, 1994
"... In many cases, a logic program can be divided into two parts, so that one of them, the \bottom " part, does not refer to the predicates de ned in the \top " part. The \bottom " rules can be used then for the evaluation of the predicates that they de ne, and the computed va ..."
Abstract

Cited by 270 (15 self)
 Add to MetaCart
In many cases, a logic program can be divided into two parts, so that one of them, the \bottom &quot; part, does not refer to the predicates de ned in the \top &quot; part. The \bottom &quot; rules can be used then for the evaluation of the predicates that they de ne, and the computed values can be used to simplify the \top &quot; de nitions. We discuss this idea of splitting a program in the context of the answer set semantics. The main theorem shows how computing the answer sets for a program can be simpli ed when the program is split into parts. The programs covered by the theorem may use both negation as failure and classical negation, and their rules may have disjunctive heads. The usefulness of the concept of splitting for the investigation of answer sets is illustrated by several applications. First, we show that a conservative extension theorem by Gelfond and Przymusinska and a theorem on the closed world assumption by Gelfond and Lifschitz are easy consequences of the splitting theorem. Second, (locally) strati ed programs are shown to have a simple characterization in terms of splitting. The existence and uniqueness of an answer set for such a program can be easily derived from this characterization. Third, we relate the idea of splitting to the notion of orderconsistency. 1
Logic Programming and Negation: A Survey
 JOURNAL OF LOGIC PROGRAMMING
, 1994
"... We survey here various approaches which were proposed to incorporate negation in logic programs. We concentrate on the prooftheoretic and modeltheoretic issues and the relationships between them. ..."
Abstract

Cited by 250 (8 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We survey here various approaches which were proposed to incorporate negation in logic programs. We concentrate on the prooftheoretic and modeltheoretic issues and the relationships between them.
Logic Programming and Knowledge Representation
 Journal of Logic Programming
, 1994
"... In this paper, we review recent work aimed at the application of declarative logic programming to knowledge representation in artificial intelligence. We consider exten sions of the language of definite logic programs by classical (strong) negation, disjunc tion, and some modal operators and sh ..."
Abstract

Cited by 233 (21 self)
 Add to MetaCart
In this paper, we review recent work aimed at the application of declarative logic programming to knowledge representation in artificial intelligence. We consider exten sions of the language of definite logic programs by classical (strong) negation, disjunc tion, and some modal operators and show how each of the added features extends the representational power of the language.
The Alternating Fixpoint of Logic Programs with Negation
, 1995
"... The alternating fixpoint of a logic program with negation is defined constructively. The underlying idea is monotonically to build up a set of negative conclusions until the least fixpoint is reached, using a transformation related to the one that defines stable models. From a fixed set of negative ..."
Abstract

Cited by 216 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The alternating fixpoint of a logic program with negation is defined constructively. The underlying idea is monotonically to build up a set of negative conclusions until the least fixpoint is reached, using a transformation related to the one that defines stable models. From a fixed set of negative conclusions, the positive conclusions follow (without deriving any further negative ones), by traditional Horn clause semantics. The union of positive and negative conclusions is called the alternating xpoint partial model. The name "alternating" was chosen because the transformation runs in two passes; the first pass transforms an underestimate of the set of negative conclusions into an (intermediate) overestimate; the second pass transforms the overestimate into a new underestimate; the composition of the two passes is monotonic. The principal contributions of this work are (1) that the alternating fixpoint partial model is identical to the wellfounded partial model, and (2) that alternating xpoint logic is at least as expressive as xpoint logic on all structures. Also, on finite structures, fixpoint logic is as expressive as alternating fixpoint logic.
GraphLog: a Visual Formalism for Real Life Recursion
 In Proceedings of the Ninth ACM SIGACTSIGMOD Symposium on Principles of Database Systems
, 1990
"... We present a query language called GraphLog, based on a graph representation of both data and queries. Queries are graph patterns. Edges in queries represent edges or paths in the database. Regular expressions are used to qualify these paths. We characterize the expressive power of the language a ..."
Abstract

Cited by 176 (18 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
We present a query language called GraphLog, based on a graph representation of both data and queries. Queries are graph patterns. Edges in queries represent edges or paths in the database. Regular expressions are used to qualify these paths. We characterize the expressive power of the language and show that it is equivalent to stratified linear Datalog, first order logic with transitive closure, and nondeterministic logarithmic space (assuming ordering on the domain). The fact that the latter three classes coincide was not previously known. We show how GraphLog can be extended to incorporate aggregates and path summarization, and describe briefly our current prototype implementation. 1 Introduction The literature on theoretical and computational aspects of deductive databases, and the additional power they provide in defining and querying data, has grown rapidly in recent years. Much less work has gone into the design of languages and interfaces that make this additional pow...
Every Logic Program Has a Natural Stratification And an Iterated Least Fixed Point Model (Extended Abstract)
, 1989
"... 1 Introduction The perfect model semantics [ABW88, VG89b, Prz88a, Prz89b] provides an attractive alternative to the traditionally used semantics of logic programs based on Clark's completion of the program [Cla78, Llo84, Fit85, Kun87]. Perfect models are minimal models of the program, which ca ..."
Abstract

Cited by 143 (12 self)
 Add to MetaCart
1 Introduction The perfect model semantics [ABW88, VG89b, Prz88a, Prz89b] provides an attractive alternative to the traditionally used semantics of logic programs based on Clark's completion of the program [Cla78, Llo84, Fit85, Kun87]. Perfect models are minimal models of the program, which can be equivalently described as iterated least fixed points of natural operators [ABW88, VG89b], as iterated least models of the program [ABW88, VG89b] or as preferred models with respect to a natural priority relation [Prz88a, Prz89b]. As a result, the perfect model semantics is not only very intuitive, but it also has been proven equivalent to suitable forms of all four major formalizations of nonmonotonic reasoning in AI (see [Prz88b]) and is used in existing database [Zan88] and truth maintenance systems. Additionally, the perfect model semantics eliminates some serious drawbacks of Clark's semantics [Prz89b] and admits a natural sound and complete procedural mechanism, called SLSresolution [...
ConjunctiveQuery Containment and Constraint Satisfaction
 Journal of Computer and System Sciences
, 1998
"... Conjunctivequery containment is recognized as a fundamental problem in database query evaluation and optimization. At the same time, constraint satisfaction is recognized as a fundamental problem in artificial intelligence. What do conjunctivequery containment and constraint satisfaction have in c ..."
Abstract

Cited by 142 (15 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Conjunctivequery containment is recognized as a fundamental problem in database query evaluation and optimization. At the same time, constraint satisfaction is recognized as a fundamental problem in artificial intelligence. What do conjunctivequery containment and constraint satisfaction have in common? Our main conceptual contribution in this paper is to point out that, despite their very different formulation, conjunctivequery containment and constraint satisfaction are essentially the same problem. The reason is that they can be recast as the following fundamental algebraic problem: given two finite relational structures A and B, is there a homomorphism h : A ! B? As formulated above, the homomorphism problem is uniform in the sense that both relational structures A and B are part of the input. By fixing the structure B, one obtains the following nonuniform problem: given a finite relational structure A, is there a homomorphism h : A ! B? In general, nonuniform tractability results do not uniformize. Thus, it is natural to ask: which tractable cases of nonuniform tractability results for constraint satisfaction and conjunctivequery containment do uniformize? Our main technical contribution in this paper is to show that several cases of tractable nonuniform constraint satisfaction problems do indeed uniformize. We exhibit three nonuniform tractability results that uniformize and, thus, give rise to polynomialtime solvable cases of constraint satisfaction and conjunctivequery containment.