Results 1 -
2 of
2
Catching the drift: Using feature-free case-based reasoning for spam filtering
- In Procs. of the 7th International Conference on Case Based Reasoning
, 2007
"... Abstract. In this paper, we compare case-based spam filters, focusing on their resilience to concept drift. In particular, we evaluate how to track concept drift using a case-based spam filter that uses a featurefree distance measure based on text compression. In our experiments, we compare two ways ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 2 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Abstract. In this paper, we compare case-based spam filters, focusing on their resilience to concept drift. In particular, we evaluate how to track concept drift using a case-based spam filter that uses a featurefree distance measure based on text compression. In our experiments, we compare two ways to normalise such a distance measure, finding that the one proposed in [1] performs better. We show that a policy as simple as retaining misclassified examples has a hugely beneficial effect on handling concept drift in spam but, on its own, it results in the case base growing by over 30%. We then compare two different retention policies and two different forgetting policies (one a form of instance selection, the other a form of instance weighting) and find that they perform roughly as well as each other while keeping the case base size constant. Finally, we compare a feature-based textual case-based spam filter with our feature-free approach. In the face of concept drift, the feature-based approach requires the case base to be rebuilt periodically so that we can select a new feature set that better predicts the target concept. We find feature-free approaches to have lower error rates than their feature-based equivalents. 1
Robust feature induction for support vector machines
- in: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Machine Learning
, 2004
"... The goal of feature induction is to automatically create nonlinear combinations of existing features as additional input features to improve classification accuracy. Typically, nonlinear features are introduced into a support vector machine (SVM) through a nonlinear kernel function. One disadvantage ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 1 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
The goal of feature induction is to automatically create nonlinear combinations of existing features as additional input features to improve classification accuracy. Typically, nonlinear features are introduced into a support vector machine (SVM) through a nonlinear kernel function. One disadvantage of such an approach is that the feature space induced by a kernel function is usually of high dimension and therefore will substantially increase the chance of over-fitting the training data. Another disadvantage is that nonlinear features are induced implicitly and therefore are difficult for people to understand which induced features are critical to the classification performance. In this paper, we propose a boosting-style algorithm that can explicitly induces important nonlinear features for SVMs. We present empirical studies with discussion to show that this approach is effective in improving classification accuracy for SVMs. The comparison with an SVM model using nonlinear kernels also indicates that this approach is effective and robust, particularly when the number of training data is small. 1.

