Results 1 - 10
of
42
A Maximum Entropy approach to Natural Language Processing
- COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS
, 1996
"... The concept of maximum entropy can be traced back along multiple threads to Biblical times. Only recently, however, have computers become powerful enough to permit the widescale application of this concept to real world problems in statistical estimation and pattern recognition. In this paper we des ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 847 (6 self)
- Add to MetaCart
The concept of maximum entropy can be traced back along multiple threads to Biblical times. Only recently, however, have computers become powerful enough to permit the widescale application of this concept to real world problems in statistical estimation and pattern recognition. In this paper we describe a method for statistical modeling based on maximum entropy. We present a maximum-likelihood approach for automatically constructing maximum entropy models and describe how to implement this approach efficiently, using as examples several problems in natural language processing.
Some advances in transformation-based part-of-speech tagging
- In Proceedings of the Twelfth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence
, 1994
"... Most recent research in trainable part of speech taggers has explored stochastic tagging. While these taggers obtain high accuracy, linguistic information is captured indirectly, typically in tens of thousands of lexical and contextual probabilities. In (Brill 1992), a trainable rule-based tagger wa ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 227 (1 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Most recent research in trainable part of speech taggers has explored stochastic tagging. While these taggers obtain high accuracy, linguistic information is captured indirectly, typically in tens of thousands of lexical and contextual probabilities. In (Brill 1992), a trainable rule-based tagger was described that obtained performance comparable to that of stochastic taggers, but captured relevant linguistic information in a small number of simple non-stochastic rules. In this paper, we describe a number of extensions to this rule-based tagger. First, we describe a method for expressing lexical relations in tagging that stochastic taggers are currently unable to express. Next, we show a rule-based approach to tagging unknown words. Finally, we show how the tagger can be extended into a k-best tagger, where multiple tags can be assigned to words in some cases of uncertainty.
Tagging English Text with a Probabilistic Model
, 1994
"... In this paper we present some experiments on the use of a probabilistic model to tag English text, i.e. to assign to each word the correct tag (part of speech) in the context of the sentence. The main novelty of these experiments is the use of untagged text in the training of the model. We have used ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 212 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
In this paper we present some experiments on the use of a probabilistic model to tag English text, i.e. to assign to each word the correct tag (part of speech) in the context of the sentence. The main novelty of these experiments is the use of untagged text in the training of the model. We have used a simple triclass Markov model and are looking for the best way to estimate the parameters of this model, depending on the kind and amount of training data provided. Two approaches in particular are compared and combined: using text that has been tagged by hand and computing relative frequency counts, using text without tags and training the model as a hidden Markov process, according to a Maximum Likelihood principle
Three New Probabilistic Models for Dependency Parsing: An Exploration
, 1996
"... After presenting a novel O(n³) parsing algorithm for dependency grammar, we develop three contrasting ways to stochasticize it. We propose (a) a lexical affinity model where words struggle to modify each other, (b) a sense tagging model where words fluctuate randomly in their selectional prefe ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 200 (12 self)
- Add to MetaCart
After presenting a novel O(n³) parsing algorithm for dependency grammar, we develop three contrasting ways to stochasticize it. We propose (a) a lexical affinity model where words struggle to modify each other, (b) a sense tagging model where words fluctuate randomly in their selectional preferences, and (c) a generative model where the speaker fleshes out each word's syntactic and conceptual structure without regard to the implications for the hearer. We also give preliminary empirical results from evaluating the three models' parsing performance on annotated Wall Street Journal training text (derived from the Penn Treebank). In these results, the generative model performs significantly better than the others, and does about equally well at assigning part-of-speech tags.
Decision Lists For Lexical Ambiguity Resolution: Application to Accent Restoration in Spanish and French
, 1994
"... This paper presents a statistical decision procedure for lexical ambiguity resolution. The algorithm exploits both local syntactic patterns and more distant collocational evidence, generating an efficient, effective, and highly perspicuous recipe for resolving a given ambiguity. By identifying and u ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 126 (3 self)
- Add to MetaCart
This paper presents a statistical decision procedure for lexical ambiguity resolution. The algorithm exploits both local syntactic patterns and more distant collocational evidence, generating an efficient, effective, and highly perspicuous recipe for resolving a given ambiguity. By identifying and utilizing only the single best disambiguating evidence in a target context, the algorithm avoids the problematic complex modeling of statistical dependencies. Although directly applicable to a wide class of ambiguities, the algorithm is described and evaluated in a realistic case study, the problem of restoring missing accents in Spanish and French text. Current accuracy exceeds 99% on the full task, and typically is over 90% for even the most difficult ambiguities.
Introduction to the Special Issue on Computational Linguistics using Large Corpora
- Computational Linguistics
, 1993
"... ..."
Committee-Based Sampling For Training Probabilistic Classifiers
- In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Machine Learning
, 1995
"... In many real-world learning tasks, it is expensive to acquire a sufficient number of labeled examples for training. This paper proposes a general method for efficiently training probabilistic classifiers, by selecting for training only the more informative examples in a stream of unlabeled examples. ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 93 (3 self)
- Add to MetaCart
In many real-world learning tasks, it is expensive to acquire a sufficient number of labeled examples for training. This paper proposes a general method for efficiently training probabilistic classifiers, by selecting for training only the more informative examples in a stream of unlabeled examples. The method, committee-based sampling, evaluates the informativeness of an example by measuring the degree of disagreement between several model variants. These variants (the committee) are drawn randomly from a probability distribution conditioned by the training set selected so far (Monte-Carlo sampling). The method is particularly attractive because it evaluates the expected information gain from a training example implicitly, making the model both easy to implement and generally applicable. We further show how to apply committeebased sampling for training Hidden Markov Model classifiers, which are commonly used for complex classification tasks. The method was implemented and tested for ...
Word sense disambiguation: The state of the art
- Computational Linguistics
, 1998
"... The automatic disambiguation of word senses has been an interest and concern since the earliest days of computer treatment of language in the 1950's. Sense disambiguation is an “intermediate task ” (Wilks and Stevenson, 1996) which is not an end in itself, but rather is necessary at one level or ano ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 92 (3 self)
- Add to MetaCart
The automatic disambiguation of word senses has been an interest and concern since the earliest days of computer treatment of language in the 1950's. Sense disambiguation is an “intermediate task ” (Wilks and Stevenson, 1996) which is not an end in itself, but rather is necessary at one level or another to accomplish most natural language processing tasks. It is
Deterministic Part-of-Speech Tagging with Finite-State Transducers
- Computational Linguistics
, 1995
"... Stochastic approaches to natural language processing have often been preferred to rule-based approaches because of their robustness and their automatic training capabilities. This was the case for part-of-speech tagging until Brill showed how state-of-the-art part-of-speech tagging can be achieved w ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 75 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Stochastic approaches to natural language processing have often been preferred to rule-based approaches because of their robustness and their automatic training capabilities. This was the case for part-of-speech tagging until Brill showed how state-of-the-art part-of-speech tagging can be achieved with a rule-based tagger by inferring rules from a training corpus. However, current implementations of the rule-based tagger run more slowly than previous approaches. In this paper, we present a finite-state tagger, inspired by the rule-based tagger, that operates in optimal time in the sense that the time to assign tags to a sentence corresponds to the time required to follow a single path in a deterministic finite-state machine. This result is achieved by encoding the application of the rules found in the tagger as a nondeterministic finite-state transducer and then turning it into a deterministic transducer. The resulting deterministic transducer yields a part-of-speech tagger whose speed is dominated by the access time of mass storage devices. We then generalize the techniques to the class of transformation-based systems. 1.
Automatic stochastic tagging of natural language texts
- Computational Linguistics
, 1995
"... Five language and tagset independent stochastic taggers, handling morphological and contextual information, are presented and tested in corpora of seven European languages (Dutch, English, French, German, Greek, Italian and Spanish), using two sets of grammatical tags; a small set containing the ele ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 48 (4 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Five language and tagset independent stochastic taggers, handling morphological and contextual information, are presented and tested in corpora of seven European languages (Dutch, English, French, German, Greek, Italian and Spanish), using two sets of grammatical tags; a small set containing the eleven main grammatical classes and a large set of grammatical categories common to all languages. The unknown words are tagged using an experimentally proven stochastic hypothesis that links the stochastic behavior of the unknown words with that of the less probable known words. A fully automatic training and tagging program has been implemented on an IBM PC-compatible 80386-based computer. Measurements of error rate, time response, and memory requirements have shown that the taggers " performance is satisfactory, even though a small training text is available. The error rate is improved when new texts are used to update the stochastic model parameters. 1.

