Results 1 -
3 of
3
Learning to select a ranking function
"... Abstract. Learning To Rank (LTR) techniques aim to learn an effective document ranking function by combining several document features. While the function learned may be uniformly applied to all queries, many studies have shown that different ranking functions favour different queries, and the retri ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 4 (3 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Abstract. Learning To Rank (LTR) techniques aim to learn an effective document ranking function by combining several document features. While the function learned may be uniformly applied to all queries, many studies have shown that different ranking functions favour different queries, and the retrieval performance can be significantly enhanced if an appropriate ranking function is selected for each individual query. In this paper, we propose a novel Learning To Select framework that selectively applies an appropriate ranking function on a per-query basis. The approach employs a query feature to identify similar training queries for an unseen query. The ranking function which performs the best on this identified training query set is then chosen for the unseen query. In particular, we propose the use of divergence, which measures the extent that a document ranking function alters the scores of an initial ranking of documents for a given query, as a query feature. We evaluate our method using tasks from the TREC Web and Million Query tracks, in combination with the LETOR 3.0 and LETOR 4.0 feature sets. Our experimental results show that our proposed method is effective and robust for selecting an appropriate ranking function on a per-query basis. In particular, it always outperforms three state-of-the-art LTR techniques, namely Ranking SVM, AdaRank, and the automatic feature selection method. 1
Learning Models for Ranking Aggregates
"... Abstract. Aggregate ranking tasks are those where documents are not the final ranking outcome, but instead an intermediary component. For instance, in expert search, a ranking of candidate persons with relevant expertise to a query is generated after consideration of a document ranking. Many models ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 1 (1 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Abstract. Aggregate ranking tasks are those where documents are not the final ranking outcome, but instead an intermediary component. For instance, in expert search, a ranking of candidate persons with relevant expertise to a query is generated after consideration of a document ranking. Many models exist for aggregate ranking tasks, however obtaining an effective and robust setting for different aggregate ranking tasks is difficult to achieve. In this work, we propose a novel learned approach to aggregate ranking, which combines different document ranking features as well as aggregate ranking approaches. We experiment with our proposed approach using two TREC test collections for expert and blog search. Our experimental results attest the effectiveness and robustness of a learned model for aggregate ranking across different settings. 1
Experiments with Terrier Blog, Entity, Million Query, Relevance Feedback, and Web tracks
"... In TREC 2009, we extend our Voting Model for the faceted blog distillation, top stories identification, and related entity finding tasks. Moreover, we experiment with our novel xQuAD framework for search result diversification. Besides fostering our research in multiple directions, by participating ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
In TREC 2009, we extend our Voting Model for the faceted blog distillation, top stories identification, and related entity finding tasks. Moreover, we experiment with our novel xQuAD framework for search result diversification. Besides fostering our research in multiple directions, by participating in such a wide portfolio of tracks, we further develop the indexing and retrieval capabilities of our Terrier Information Retrieval platform, to effectively and efficiently cope with a new generation of large-scale test collections. 1.

