Results 1 
4 of
4
Categorical structures enriched in a quantaloid: Categories, distributions and functors
 Theory Appl. Categ
"... We study the different guises of the projective objects in Cocont(Q): they are the “completely distributive ” cocomplete Qcategories (the left adjoint to the Yoneda embedding admits a further left adjoint); equivalently, they are the “totally continuous ” cocomplete Qcategories (every object is th ..."
Abstract

Cited by 20 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We study the different guises of the projective objects in Cocont(Q): they are the “completely distributive ” cocomplete Qcategories (the left adjoint to the Yoneda embedding admits a further left adjoint); equivalently, they are the “totally continuous ” cocomplete Qcategories (every object is the supremum of the presheaf of objects “totally below ” it); and also are they the Qcategories of regular presheaves on a regular Qsemicategory. As a particular case, the Qcategories of presheaves on a Qcategory are precisely the “totally algebraic” cocomplete Qcategories (every object is the supremum of the “totally compact” objects below it). We think that these results should be part of a yettobeunderstood “quantaloidenriched domain theory”. 1
Frobenius monads and pseudomonoids
 2CATEGORIES COMPANION 73
, 2004
"... Six equivalent definitions of Frobenius algebra in a monoidal category are provided. In a monoidal bicategory, a pseudoalgebra is Frobenius if and only i f it is star autonomous. Autonomous pseudoalgebras are also Frobenius. What i t means for a morphism of a bicategory to be a projective equivalenc ..."
Abstract

Cited by 19 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Six equivalent definitions of Frobenius algebra in a monoidal category are provided. In a monoidal bicategory, a pseudoalgebra is Frobenius if and only i f it is star autonomous. Autonomous pseudoalgebras are also Frobenius. What i t means for a morphism of a bicategory to be a projective equivalence is defined; this concept is related to "strongly separable " Frobenius algebras and "weak monoidal Morita equivalence". Wreath products of Frobenius algebras are discussed.
Notes on enriched categories with colimits of some class
 Theory Appl. Categ
"... The paper is in essence a survey of categories having φweighted colimits for all the weights φ in some class Φ. We introduce the class Φ + of Φflat weights which are those ψ for which ψcolimits commute in the base V with limits having weights in Φ; and the class Φ − of Φatomic weights, which are ..."
Abstract

Cited by 9 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The paper is in essence a survey of categories having φweighted colimits for all the weights φ in some class Φ. We introduce the class Φ + of Φflat weights which are those ψ for which ψcolimits commute in the base V with limits having weights in Φ; and the class Φ − of Φatomic weights, which are those ψ for which ψlimits commute in the base V with colimits having weights in Φ. We show that both these classes are saturated (that is, what was called closed in the terminology of [AK88]). We prove that for the class P of all weights, the classes P + and P − both coincide with the class Q of absolute weights. For any class Φ and any category A, we have the free Φcocompletion Φ(A) of A; and we recognize Q(A) as the Cauchycompletion of A. We study the equivalence between (Q(A op)) op and Q(A), which we exhibit as the restriction of the Isbell adjunction between [A, V] op and [A op, V] when A is small; and we give a new Morita theorem for any class Φ containing Q. We end with the study of Φcontinuous weights and their relation to the Φflat weights. 1
An Australian conspectus of higher categories

, 2004
"... Much Australian work on categories is part of, or relevant to, the development of higher categories and their theory. In this note, I hope to describe some of the origins and achievements of our efforts that they might perchance serve as a guide to the development of aspects of higherdimensional wo ..."
Abstract

Cited by 6 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Much Australian work on categories is part of, or relevant to, the development of higher categories and their theory. In this note, I hope to describe some of the origins and achievements of our efforts that they might perchance serve as a guide to the development of aspects of higherdimensional work. I trust that the somewhat autobiographical style will add interest rather than be a distraction. For so long I have felt rather apologetic when describing how categories might be helpful to other mathematicians; I have often felt even worse when mentioning enriched and higher categories to category theorists. This is not to say that I have doubted the value of our work, rather that I have felt slowed down by the continual pressure to defend it. At last, at this meeting, I feel justified in speaking freely amongst motivated researchers who know the need for the subject is well established. Australian Category Theory has its roots in homology theory: more precisely, in the treatment of the cohomology ring and the Künneth formulas in the book by Hilton and Wylie [HW]. The first edition of the book had a mistake concerning the cohomology ring of a product. The Künneth formulas arise from splittings of the natural short exact sequences