• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Tools

Sorted by:
Try your query at:
Semantic Scholar Scholar Academic
Google Bing DBLP
Results 1 - 10 of 3,752
Next 10 →

Table 4: TLB Results for tlb hit0 BP 1BNtlb hit1 BP 0

in Combining ATPG and symbolic simulation for efficient validation of embedded array systems
by Ganapathy Parthasarathy, Madhu K. Iyer, Tao Feng, Li-c. Wang, Kwang-ting (tim Cheng, Magdy S. Abadir 2002
"... In PAGE 9: ... When way 0 entry matches, the address is com- puted from the data stored in way 0 and tlb hit0 BP 1 (and vice verse). Table4 shows results based upon the assertion for tlb hit0 BP 1 and tlb hit1 BP 0. We emphasize that for symbolic simula- tion alone, if no manual effort is involved to adjust the variable ordering, the simulation would abort when more than 19 sym- bolic bits are used.... ..."
Cited by 1

Table 3: The Microsoft Manuals. manual words bytes

in unknown title
by unknown authors 1998
"... In PAGE 3: ... In both cases En- glish represents the source language of the bi-text. Table3 below shows some information about their sizes. Table 3: The Microsoft Manuals.... ..."
Cited by 4

Table 1. Manual Annotation

in Resolving Portuguese Nominal Anaphora
by Jorge C. B. Coelho, Vinicius M. Muller, Ra Collovini, Renata Vieira, Lucia H. M. Rino

Table 2. Manual labelling

in Semiautomatic Labelling of Semantic Features
by Arantza Diaz de Ilarraza, Aingeru Mayor, Kepa Sarasola

Table 2. Manual labelling

in Semiautomatic Labelling of Semantic Features
by Arantza Diaz de Ilarraza, Aingeru Mayor, Kepa Sarasola

TABLE I COST VALUES FOR DIFFERENT TERRAIN TYPES.

in Planning with Uncertainty in Position Using High-Resolution Maps
by unknown authors

Table 3: Comparison of Manual and Automated Testing Manual Testing Automated Testing

in unknown title
by unknown authors
"... In PAGE 4: ... Also the oracle needs to be flexible enough to easily adjust to the dynamics of test generation. Table3 presents some comparisons of manual and automatic testing relative to test oracles. Table 3: Comparison of Manual and Automated Testing Manual Testing Automated Testing ... ..."

Table 5: Manually Classified Patterns

in unknown title
by unknown authors 2002
"... In PAGE 4: ... We take only patterns which form a cluster and drop single-element patterns which do not have a paraphrase among the patterns. The result of manual classification in this experiment is shown in Table5 . We got 111 distinct clusters for arrest events and 20 for personnel affairs.... ..."
Cited by 43

Table 5: Manually Classified Patterns

in unknown title
by unknown authors 2002
"... In PAGE 4: ... We take only patterns which form a cluster and drop single-element patterns which do not have a paraphrase among the patterns. The result of manual classification in this experiment is shown in Table5 . We got 111 distinct clusters for arrest events and 20 for personnel affairs.... ..."
Cited by 43

Table 7: Manual and Mechanical Comparison. SP Manual Mechanical

in
by unknown authors
"... In PAGE 5: ... We compared the performance of Mechanical with that of Manual. The results are listed in Table7 . For example, when SP was 2, 124 out of 131 were extracted as correct variant pairs with Mechanical at a precision of 94.... In PAGE 5: ...7%. To analyze the performance of Manual and Mechanical in Table7 , we conducted paired t-test (rejection region: 5%) between SP 1andSP 3 as listed in Table 8 and found that the performance of Manual and Mechanical was almost same. We investigated the relation of mechanically determined SP and recall, precision, and F-measure of Table 7.... In PAGE 5: ...anual at a precision of 80.7%. To analyze the performance of Manual and Mechanical in Table 7, we conducted paired t-test (rejection region: 5%) between SP 1andSP 3 as listed in Table 8 and found that the performance of Manual and Mechanical was almost same. We investigated the relation of mechanically determined SP and recall, precision, and F-measure of Table7 . Fig.... In PAGE 5: ...05 of the threshold of cosine similarities was the best F-measure. We also investigated the relation of manually determined SP and recall, precision, and F-measure of Table7 as shown in Fig. 4 and found that the combination of 3 of the manu- ally determined SP and 0.... ..."
Next 10 →
Results 1 - 10 of 3,752
Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2016 The Pennsylvania State University