### Table 2 Misclassification matrix for the soybean dataset for the GDBSCAN and PDDP clustering algorithms GDBSCAN PDDP

2006

"... In PAGE 7: ... Nonetheless, these methods tend to overestimate the true number of clusters resulting in rigid clustering. In Table2 , we present the misclassification matrices for these two algorithms. The parameters for the GDBSCAN were set to Epts = 2.... ..."

### Table 3.2 Average Daily Temperature and Temperature Gradient for all Levels at Different Temperature Trends (N.B. negative number indicates temperature decreases with depth)

1997

### Table 2. Interpolated

"... In PAGE 3: ... Precision-recall curves for the second corpus appear in Figure 2. Table2 provides the 11- point interpolated average precision for the four approaches used. The 11-point average precision for Approach 1 and Corpus 1 was 0.... ..."

### Table Size for Quadratic Interpolation

1998

Cited by 1

### Table 1. Interpolation methods.

### Table 1: Interpolation functions k

1991

"... In PAGE 42: ...0010 0.0010 H 4 basis n0clter n0clter in x n0clter in y H 4 a f1 f2 H 4 b f3 f4 H 4 c f5 f6 H 4 d f6 f5 H 4 e f4 f3 H 4 f f2 f1 Table1 0: 13-tap n0clters for x-y separable basis set for H 4 . Filters for which tap 0 is 0.... In PAGE 43: ...Low -Order Terms of Fourier Series for Oriented Energy for G 2 and H 2 E G 2 H 2 n28n12n29 = C 1 + C 2 cosn282n12n29+C 3 sinn282n12n29+ higher order terms where C 1 = 0:5n5bG 2b n5d 2 +0:25n5bG 2a n5dn5bG 2c n5d+0:375n28n5bG 2a n5d 2 +n5bG 2c n5d 2 n29+ 0:3125n28n5bH 2a n5d 2 +n5bH 2d n5d 2 n29+0:5625n28n5bH 2b n5d 2 +n5bH 2c n5d 2 n29 +0:375n28n5bH 2a n5dn5bH 2c n5d+n5bH 2b n5dn5bH 2d n5dn29 C 2 = 0:5n28n5bG 2a n5d 2 n00 n5bG 2c n5d 2 n29+0:46875n28n5bH 2a n5d 2 n00 n5bH 2d n5d 2 n29 +0:28125n28n5bH 2b n5d 2 n00 n5bH 2c n5d 2 n29+0:1875n28n5bH 2a n5dn5bH 2c n5d n00 n5bH 2b n5dn5bH 2d n5dn29 C 3 = n00n5bG 2a n5dn5bG 2b n5d n00 n5bG 2b n5dn5bG 2c n5d n000:9375n28n5bH 2c n5dn5bH 2d n5d+n5bH 2a n5dn5bH 2b n5dn29 n00 1:6875n5bH 2b n5dn5bH 2c n5d n00 0:1875n5bH 2a n5dn5bH 2d n5d dominant orientation angle, n12 d = argn5bC 2 ;C 3 n5d 2 orientation strength = q C 2 2 + C 2 3 Table1 1: Fourier series for oriented energy, E, as a function of angle, n12, for the G 2 , H 2 quadrature n0clter pair. G 2a , G 2b , ::: and H 2a , H 2b , ::: are the outputs of the x-y separable basis n0clters listed in Tables 4 and 6.... ..."

Cited by 560

### Table 1: Interpolation functions k

1991

"... In PAGE 42: ...0010 0.0010 H 4 basis n0clter n0clter in x n0clter in y H 4 a f1 f2 H 4 b f3 f4 H 4 c f5 f6 H 4 d f6 f5 H 4 e f4 f3 H 4 f f2 f1 Table1 0: 13-tap n0clters for x-y separable basis set for H 4 . Filters for which tap 0 is 0.... In PAGE 43: ...Low -Order Terms of Fourier Series for Oriented Energy for G 2 and H 2 E G 2 H 2 n28n12n29 = C 1 + C 2 cosn282n12n29+C 3 sinn282n12n29+ higher order terms where C 1 = 0:5n5bG 2b n5d 2 +0:25n5bG 2a n5dn5bG 2c n5d+0:375n28n5bG 2a n5d 2 +n5bG 2c n5d 2 n29+ 0:3125n28n5bH 2a n5d 2 +n5bH 2d n5d 2 n29+0:5625n28n5bH 2b n5d 2 +n5bH 2c n5d 2 n29 +0:375n28n5bH 2a n5dn5bH 2c n5d+n5bH 2b n5dn5bH 2d n5dn29 C 2 = 0:5n28n5bG 2a n5d 2 n00 n5bG 2c n5d 2 n29+0:46875n28n5bH 2a n5d 2 n00 n5bH 2d n5d 2 n29 +0:28125n28n5bH 2b n5d 2 n00 n5bH 2c n5d 2 n29+0:1875n28n5bH 2a n5dn5bH 2c n5d n00 n5bH 2b n5dn5bH 2d n5dn29 C 3 = n00n5bG 2a n5dn5bG 2b n5d n00 n5bG 2b n5dn5bG 2c n5d n000:9375n28n5bH 2c n5dn5bH 2d n5d+n5bH 2a n5dn5bH 2b n5dn29 n00 1:6875n5bH 2b n5dn5bH 2c n5d n00 0:1875n5bH 2a n5dn5bH 2d n5d dominant orientation angle, n12 d = argn5bC 2 ;C 3 n5d 2 orientation strength = q C 2 2 + C 2 3 Table1 1: Fourier series for oriented energy, E, as a function of angle, n12, for the G 2 , H 2 quadrature n0clter pair. G 2a , G 2b , ::: and H 2a , H 2b , ::: are the outputs of the x-y separable basis n0clters listed in Tables 4 and 6.... ..."

Cited by 560

### Table 3. Spectral hardness index correction factors (s) for differential fluxes derived from measurements in GOES-10 and GOES-11 proton channels (3) a

2005