Tools
Sorted by:
Try your query at:
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Results 1 - 10
of
48,142
Table 2.5 recapitulates the SIE fields that are allowed to be present in either the partial or full SIE with compliance to the ATM Forum [AFSEC].
Table 5. Value of Discussion Forum
2000
"... In PAGE 9: ... The discussions in the formum afforded a rich perspective on teaching and learning by the very nature of the viewpoints shared, that is, preservice teachers, beginning teachers in their second half of their first year of teaching, a clinical teacher who was on leave to work with the middle grades faculty for the year, and university supervisors. Table5 provides some insights into what value the preservice and beginning teachers felt they obtained from participation in the forum. From the sample of comments presented, it appears that beginning teachers did see their participation as helpful to their own needs in addition to their contributions to the work of the preservice teachers.... ..."
Cited by 1
Tables 5 and 6 present the accrued percentages of number of messages read and posted in the forums respectively. Due to the conception of Simuligne, this is probably the most significant indicator of the level of activities in a group. We should keep in mind that during the period covered by our study (30th April to 30th May), the forum was certainly the tool the most frequently used. Eight forums were opened in every basic group during the period covered by our study. It is not therefore surprising that the group L that died out on May 30 presents some extremely low forum-oriented interaction rates.
2002
Cited by 2
Table 1 presents the extent of the students apos; participation in Virtual-TAU forums within the six courses participating in this study. The table shows the overall number of entries to the forums apos; main pages, of messages delivered, and the average number of entries and messages per student for all courses. In addition, the ratio between operational and observational participation was analyzed (by computing the ratio between number of messages and number of page views).
2000
"... In PAGE 6: ...9.2 5.7 700.1 236.5 12.3 36.5 3.0 Table1 . extent of participation in the courses apos; forums The overall figures reinforce in quantitative terms the students apos; subjective assertions.... ..."
Cited by 5
Table 1. Contents of the students apos; and the teachers apos; messages in the VWS discourse forums. Students (N =
"... In PAGE 8: ... The evaluated project was suitable for comparing students and teachers because there were so many teachers involved compared to the number of students, although most teachers apos; contribution to the project was rather small. In Table1 are presented the general frequencies and proportions of each message content category in the students apos; and the teachers apos; messages. The general content profiles did not differ much (correlation of the distribution was 0.... ..."
Table 3. Phases of the forum
2005
Cited by 4
Table 3. Phases of the forum
2005
Cited by 4
Table 3: Timings in seconds of kernels from version 1.0 of the Java Grande Forum Benchmark Suite #28so lower values are
"... In PAGE 4: ... Selected results for low-level benchmarks from the Java Grande Benchmark Suite are shown in Table 1, with some results for our new low-level benchmarks presented in Ta- ble 2. Results for application kernels from the Java Grande Benchmark Suite are shown in Table3 , and results for our new application kernels are shown in Table 4. Where equivalent nativecode#28Fortran, C or C++#29 im- plementations of the Java benchmarks are available, we also provide results for these in order to compare the perfor- mance of Java and native code.... ..."
Table 1: Selected results from the Arith low-level benchmark from version 1.0 of the Java Grande Forum Benchmark Suite,
"... In PAGE 4: ...1 for all platforms, as well as alternative JDKs for Windows NT from IBM and Microsoft, and a beta release of the Ka#0Be JDK. Selected results for low-level benchmarks from the Java Grande Benchmark Suite are shown in Table1 , with some results for our new low-level benchmarks presented in Ta- ble 2. Results for application kernels from the Java Grande Benchmark Suite are shown in Table 3, and results for our new application kernels are shown in Table 4.... In PAGE 4: ... We ran benchmarks using the JDK for Linux on the Pow- erPC with a just-in-time #28JIT#29 compiler from Metroworks, which provides quite impressive performance. Basic arith- metic operations #28 Table1 #29 were very competitive with other platforms, although other low-level tasks such as object cre- ation and method calls #28Table 2#29 were not as good, which probably contributed to the iMac performance on the ker- nels being weaker than mighthave been expected from the speed of the arithmetic operations. In general, the JDK 1.... ..."
Table 2: Distribution of Forum Types Forum Type Frequency %
"... In PAGE 3: ... 4. Results The following tables ( Table2 and Table 3) delineate some descriptive statistics about the forums that were examined in this study and their distributions. Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences - 2006... ..."
Results 1 - 10
of
48,142
