be explained by econometric challenges due to the typical data structure, we also discuss methodological issues like panel data, endogeneity, and partial adjustment models in the capital structure context. Finally, we illustrate the methodological and empirical aspects discussed in this survey by providing

There are a number of sources of friction within the geomorphological community which the discipline can ill afford given the small number of practitioners. Perhaps foremost among these is methodology and/or technique. In an era of rapidly burgeoning techni-ques, there is a large and increasing

QTc prolongation assessment in anticancer drug development: clinical

IZA is an independent nonprofit

Item 3 (d) of the provisional agenda

Since Sidman’s first article on stimulus equivalence early in the seventies (Sidman, 1971), interest in stimulus equivalence among researchers has been substantial. Over the last 40 years, there have been a great number of publications on the sub-ject; a search in PsycInfo (June 19, 2012) gave 434 and 288 hits for the terms stimu-lus equivalence and functional equivalence, respectively. Stimulus equivalence is defined as re-sponding in accordance with the features of reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity (Sidman, 2000; Sidman & Tailby, 1982). Stimulus equivalence has been demon-strated as a relatively robust phenomenon. Most of the published studies have been concerned with basic research ques-tions (Sidman, 1994), while others have been within the area of applied behavior

The adolescent development of lesbian, gay, and bisexual people:: conceptual and methodological issues.

-based reasoning in Europe, as well. This paper gives an overview of the foundational issues related to case- based reasoning, describes some of the leading methodo- logical approaches within the field, and exemplifies the current state through pointers to some systems. Initially, a general framework is defined

This background note is focused on methodological issues and lessons learnt during the backcasting process in the VIBAT project. Those interested in more details of the research carried out during the New Horizons Research Project 2004/05 should refer to the three extended working papers

Our paper has two primary objectives. First, we discuss some of the methodological issues involved in reconciling microdata and published data on household wealth distribution both with each other and with aggregate balance sheet data on household wealth. Second, on the basis