Results 1 - 10
of
4,416
Table 1 possess the following capabilities: #0F They offer applications the ability to flexibly config- ure layered resource management mechanisms needed to control their QoS end-to-end; #0F They automatically protect resources needed by certain application-critical operations; #0F They promote autonomous or semi-autonomous behavior to respond adaptively and reflectively to changing situa- tional aspects in their run-time environment. The following section summarizes recent advances in DOC middleware that provide COTS-based implementations for some of these capabilities.
2000
"... In PAGE 4: ...1. Table1 characterizes the key challenges as- sociated with developing QoS-enabled middleware for next- generation distributed applications. In general, solutions that are emerging to meet the QoS-related challenges outlined in Table 1 possess the following capabilities: #0F They offer applications the ability to flexibly config- ure layered resource management mechanisms needed to control their QoS end-to-end; #0F They automatically protect resources needed by certain application-critical operations; #0F They promote autonomous or semi-autonomous behavior to respond adaptively and reflectively to changing situa- tional aspects in their run-time environment.... ..."
Cited by 2
Table 5 compares the efficiency of our reference architectures for the FFT benchmark. Com- pared to FIR and IIR, FFT is a more complexkernel. Pleiadesoutperforms the otherprocessorsby a large margin owing to its ability to exploit higher levels of parallelism by creating a dedicated parallel structure from its computational resources and flexible interconnect.
1998
"... In PAGE 5: ...5 0.759 Table5... ..."
Cited by 15
Table 5 compares the efficiency of our reference architectures for the FFT benchmark. Com- pared to FIR and IIR, FFT is a more complexkernel. Pleiadesoutperforms the otherprocessorsby a large margin owing to its ability to exploit higher levels of parallelism by creating a dedicated parallel structure from its computational resources and flexible interconnect.
1998
"... In PAGE 5: ...5 0.759 Table5... ..."
Cited by 15
Table 2. Effect of the Cost of Fuel Economy On the Elasticity of Gasoline Demand
Table 2. Development Flexibility Rating Levels Feature Very Low Nominal/High Extra High
2004
"... In PAGE 41: ...00 CPLX Nominal 1.00 Calibrating EM1-17 ( Table2 6), results in a product of 0.64 that deviates significantly from the default nominal value of 1.... In PAGE 45: ... The skills in question are general professional ability, programming ability, experience with the development environment and familiarity with the project domain. In the line of expectations, these attributes are the most influential on the projects development effort followed by product factors (see Table2 9). Such refer to the constraints and requirements placed upon the project to be developed.... ..."
Table1: Visualization Model
"... In PAGE 6: ... The higher the similarity of the documents within a cluster, the lighter is the color of the corresponding sphere. Table1 provides an overview of the used visualization model. A strength of the interface comes from its ability to flexibly interact with a set of documents.... ..."
Table 87 - Flexible Disk Page
"... In PAGE 14: ...able 86 - Defect List Header .........................................................................................................................71 Table87 - Flexible Disk Page .... ..."
Table 5. Results for flexible assignment
2005
"... In PAGE 11: ...We see that alternatives 1a and 1b again have a significantly lower throughput time than the initial process and also alternative 1 performs significantly better. Next to this, we compare the results of flexible assignment ( Table5 ) with the results of random allocation (Table 3 and Table 4). Flexible assignment does not seem to improve process performance, because for all alternatives... ..."
Cited by 3
Table 1. Flexible link parameters
2005
"... In PAGE 6: ... Flexible link parameters A potentiometer measures the angular position of the system, and the arm deflections are measured by means of a strain gauge mounted near its base. The whole system, whose parameters are shown in Table1 , is displayed in Fig. 1.... ..."
Cited by 1
Results 1 - 10
of
4,416