Results 11 - 20 of 8,853

Table 1. The Distribution of the Errors of Commission and the Errors of Omission

in Error Analysis of Chinese Text Segmentation using Statistical Approach
by Christopher C. Yang

Table 1. Parameters used in the comparison of omission probabilities

in Tackling Large State Spaces in Performance Modelling ⋆
by William J. Knottenbelt, Jeremy T. Bradley

Table 2. Omissions for single RN observation (RN #3)

in An Analysis of Nurses ’ Cognitive Work: A New Perspective for Understanding Medical Errors
by Patricia Potter, Laurie Wolf, Stuart Boxerman, Deborah Grayson, Jennifer Sledge Clay Dunagan
"... In PAGE 8: ... Calculations were made to show the cognitive load at the time each interruption occurred and at the time of any omission in care. The accumulative cognitive stacking measure for RN #3 at the time of each interruption is shown in Table 1, and each omission in Table2 . Omissions for RN #3 occurred with a cognitive ... ..."

Table 6: Omission from obligatory contexts Subjects Objects

in Subject Omission in Children's Language:
by The Case For, Daniel Freudenthal, Julian Pine, Fernand Gobet, Hug Mummy 2002
"... In PAGE 5: ... Table 5: Verbs that take obligatory objects. Bought Ironed Saved Broke Like Saw Brought Love See Caught Loves Sharpened Covered Made Thought Drinked Miss Throwed Fix Need Took Folded Pulled Want Found Rode Wants Gave Said Washed Table6 compares the proportion of omitted subjects and objects from obligatory contexts (verbs from tables 1 and 2 for subjects, verbs from table 5 for objects). It can be seen that the proportion of subject omission is considerably higher than the proportion of object omission.... ..."
Cited by 6

Table 12 Comparison of omission rates between unaccented high and low syllables (%)

in Phonological theory and the development of prosodic structure: Evidence from child Japanese
by Mitsuhiko Ota
"... In PAGE 20: ... Insert Table 11 about here As for pitch itself, it shows no effect on syllable deletion. The omission rates of unaccented high and low syllables, given in Table12 , are not significantly different. Insert Table 12 about here In sum, we have seen that accent protects syllables from deletion in long targets.... In PAGE 20: ... The omission rates of unaccented high and low syllables, given in Table 12, are not significantly different. Insert Table12 about here In sum, we have seen that accent protects syllables from deletion in long targets. The preservation effect of accented syllables depends on target size but cannot be reduced to the effect of pitch itself.... ..."

Table 2 Omissions after penultimate form-changing letter vs. omissions after other letters Participant Form-changing Other

in neglect dyslexia and
by Naama Friedmann A, Aviah Gvion
"... In PAGE 4: ... other words. Table2 presents the results of the analysis of omission errors after a form-changing middle letter vs. other letters.... ..."

Table 7. Results across languages: D-omission rates

in Abstract On the L2 acquisition of the morphosyntax of
by German Nominals, Teresa Parodi, Bonnie D. Schwartz, Harald Clahsen
"... In PAGE 21: ... Plural concord: Group 1: double markings in less than 33% of the obligatory contexts Group 2: between 33% and 65% Group 3: 66% or more d. Adjective placement: Group 1: only postnominal adjectives Group 2: pre- and postnominal adjectives Group 3: only prenominal adjectives With respect to D-omissions, Table7 shows that only two speakers fall in the first group (G1), and these two are Koreans. The other Korean learners as well as Kadir, the Turkish speaker with the most elementary variety of German, and Ana I form the second group (G2), whereas Ayse, Ilhami, and the Romance subjects are in the third group (G3).... ..."

Table 4. Defect Distribution. Defect Type R amp;I-group

in Object-oriented reading techniques for inspection of UML models – an industrial experiment
by Reidar Conradi, Parastoo Mohagheghi, Tayyaba Arif, Lars Christian Hegde, Geir Arne Bunde, Anders Pedersen 2003
"... In PAGE 9: ...28 Defects logs were used to make a summary of the distribution of defects over the defined defect types. The below Table4 shows that the R amp;I-group registered most Incorrect fact, while the OORT-group found most Omission and Inconsistency. Table 4.... ..."
Cited by 5

Table I. Cost Reduction Resulting from the Omission of the Bulk Capacitors

in unknown title
by unknown authors

Table 5: Results of Periodic Omission Algorithm on Trace NLT

in New Results on Generalized Caching
by Saied Hosseini-khayat
Results 11 - 20 of 8,853