Tools
Sorted by:
Try your query at:
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Results 1 - 10
of
5,437
Table 1: Enhancing the Understanding between the creator and reader of an annotation.
1993
Cited by 11
TABLE I Enhanced Understanding With All Composite Scores 3.4 *Composite Score of Subject Area
TABLE III Enhanced Understanding With All Composite Scores 3.1 and 3.3 *Composite Score of Subject Area
Table 3 shows our proposed rendering grammar for the control structures of Java. Most of the designs are obvious, but some require explanation. Complex boolean expressions are notoriously difficult to read and understand, particularly for languages with short- circuit evaluation. We have found that a success-goes- down-failure-goes-right layout enhances readability. For example, the predicate below is laid out such that when a sub-expression evaluates to true we continue reading downwards; when it evaluates to false we go right:
2000
"... In PAGE 7: ...Table3 . Proposed rendering grammar.... ..."
Cited by 2
Table 5. Examples of Completed, In Progress, and Future Research Objectives for Metabolic Enhancement of the Soldier
"... In PAGE 10: ... The USARIEM research is directed at ensuring that scientific soundness and further ensuring the protection and enhancement of the health and performance of all warfighters. The USARIEM research effort with thrust areas and core capabilities aligned with near and far term applications is captured in Table5 . Current efforts to understand the fundamental metabolic processes underlying the responses to operational stressors, most importantly the neurophysiological responses that affect cognitive, psychomotor, and emotional status, are critical investments in the health and performance of the future Soldier.... ..."
Table III. Summary of Understandability Results Understandability
2002
Cited by 6
Table 1: Differences in understanding
"... In PAGE 9: ... To compute the differences in understanding, the two understanding vector of scores on the five questions were first normalized to unit length, in order to make the differences on individual dimensions comparable. The column quot;Diagram 1 quot; of Table1 shows the differences between the two groups on the first diagram.... In PAGE 9: ... Table1 shows that initially the primary understanding problem was with the second dimension, regarding the invoices (emphasized). Participants show smaller differences on the remaining four understanding dimension.... In PAGE 10: ... While we prevented such effects for demonstration purposes, they are not a problem in a real application of this method, as they work towards common understanding. The column quot;Diagram 2 quot; of Table1 shows the differences between the two groups. While this diagram shows a reduction in the divergence on the second dimension, the understanding differences on other dimensions have increased.... In PAGE 10: ... This diagram was examined by a third group each of business and computer science students, different again from the second groups. The results are shown in the final column of Table1 and show a divergence of only 10.... In PAGE 10: ...etween the three diagrams (from 3.1 on Diagram 1 to 2.7 on Diagram 2 to 2.9 on Diagram 3, Table1 ). The angle between the first and second understanding vector of computer science subjects was 4.... ..."
Table 7) Understand which
"... In PAGE 11: ...Table 7) Table7 shows an example of this step as it was performed in the case study. The observed phenomenon was that a Resource Owner did not find the function Recall Accepted Request satisfactory because the function did not provide an opportunity to explain why he recalled accepted requests.... In PAGE 11: ... The function as such was desired but it did not give the user the required action space: to give an explanation to the turned down booker. Table7 : Example protocol of an observed phenomenon related to the function Recall Accepted Request in The Intranet. Function Desired Existing Utilized Perceived Satisfactory Recall Accepted Request DEU : Th function is used, but only after a phone call to the booker has been made.... ..."
Table 2). Understands Agrees
"... In PAGE 2: ...3 Table 1: Expert Ex reveiwng Ey apos;s rules. Table2 shows the expert apos;s assessment of their own knowledge base, 12 weeks after they wrote it. Overtime, as an expert apos;s situation changes so does their view on quot;correct quot; knowledge.... In PAGE 2: ... Table2 Self-review of a specification, 12 weeks after it was written. Our second demonstration of situated semantics is a small thought experiment.... ..."
Table 1. Design projects for 1998-99 Program for Enhanced Design Experience
"... In PAGE 4: ... To internationalize PEDE, a pilot project, named Virtual International Design (VID) was also developed in collaboration with the Universite de Provence and Hon Industries. The goals of this PEDE/VID project were to gain an understanding and appreciation of engineering design practices in other countries, to develop personal communication skills necessary to work on a team with students from another countries on a common design project, to understand and master the difficulties of communicating clearly and concisely through electronic media, and to establish an ongoing collaborative design program with universities throughout the world Table1 shows the titles of design projects, student affiliations, and names of industrial firms sponsoring projects in 1998-99. JDDW provided five design projects, Hon industries provided two, Monsanto provided two, ALCOA provided one, and Rockwell provided one.... In PAGE 10: ... The original surveys are given in Tables 4 and 5. The survey forms were sent to all twenty-seven students of seven mechanical engineering design projects 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, and 10 (see Table1 ) that were supervised by the authors. For design projects 2, 9, and 11, other faculty from departments other than mechanical engineering also conducted surveys, but their formats were different from Tables 4 and 5.... ..."
Results 1 - 10
of
5,437
