Results 11 - 20 of 597

Table 1: Voting Rules on 4 Candidates - 8 Condorcet Loser Tournaments

in Small Binary Voting Trees
by Michael Trick

Table 3: Rules over 4 Candidates, no Condorcet Losers

in Small Binary Voting Trees
by Michael Trick

Table 3. Confidence scores and corresponding vote patterns for three neural networks. An instance of the Condorcet paradox.

in A Normative Examination of Ensemble Learning Algorithms
by David M. Pennock, C. Lee Giles, Eric Horvitz 2000
"... In PAGE 7: ... This is an illustration of the so-called Borda voting paradox, named after the eighteenth century scientist who discovered it. Table3 demonstrates another classic voting paradox, due 4http://moneycentral.msn.... ..."
Cited by 7

Table 2: Voting Rules on 4 Candidates - 8 Condorcet Loser Tournaments plus 2

in Small Binary Voting Trees
by Michael Trick

Table 2. Proportion of winners predicted.

in www.elsevier.com/locate/mcm Comparison of Weights in TOPSIS Models
by D. L. Olson 2003
"... In PAGE 4: ... TOPSIS based on equal weights was inferior. Table2 recaps Table 1 by number of teams, giving proportion of winners selected. Table 2.... ..."

Table 1: Winners from the study

in Compression of Ultrasound Images Using Wavelet Based Space-Frequency Partitions
by Ed Chiu, Jacques Vaisey, M. Stella Atkins
"... In PAGE 8: ...g. the image of the pair with the best quality in terms of medically relevant features) in the twenty four decisions from the two radiologists are shown in Table1 . Due to unclear instructions to one of the radiologists, there are three no-decision results, where the radiologist cannot choose a winner from the pair of images.... ..."

Table 1. Number of winners predicted.

in www.elsevier.com/locate/mcm Comparison of Weights in TOPSIS Models
by D. L. Olson 2003
"... In PAGE 3: ... 4. RESULTS BASED ON WINNERS Table1 gives results in terms of the number of correct winners predicted. Because baseball has undergone signiflcant expansion since 1961, the number of teams per season has varied from four teams per division to ten.... In PAGE 3: ... Because baseball has undergone signiflcant expansion since 1961, the number of teams per season has varied from four teams per division to ten. The term cases in Table1 refers to the number of seasons played with that number of teams. The proportion of correct results is biased by the number of alternatives.... In PAGE 3: ... The most complex case was for the decade beginning with 1991. Table1 reports the test results obtained from training over seasons 1991{1995. Thus the test seasons were 1996 through 2000.... In PAGE 4: ... TOPSIS based on equal weights was inferior. Table 2 recaps Table1 by number of teams, giving proportion of winners selected. Table 2.... ..."

TABLE II REQUEST PROBABILITIES AND WINNERS

in unknown title
by unknown authors 2007
Cited by 1

Table 1.Most-citedauthorsof the 1980s, rrmkedby citations topapers indexed inthe 1981-1990 Science Citation hrde.s (Scr).

in unknown title
by unknown authors

Table 5. Comparison of winner selection methods.

in Efficient Iris Recognition through Improvement of Feature Vector and Classifier
by Kwanyong Lee, Shinyoung Lim, Kwanyong Lee, Okhwan Byeon, Taiyun Kim 2001
"... In PAGE 6: ...9 % C. Winner Selection Method Table5 shows the experimental results on two methods of winner selection when we use Haar wavelet transform for fea- ture extraction and LVQ with the proposed initialization method. You can see that the proposed method, the multidi-... ..."
Cited by 21
Results 11 - 20 of 597