• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations

Tools

Sorted by:
Try your query at:
Semantic Scholar Scholar Academic
Google Bing DBLP
Results 1 - 10 of 9,984
Next 10 →

Defeasible Logic Programming: An Argumentative Approach. Theory and Practice

by Alejandro J. García, Guillermo R. Simari - of Logic Programming , 2004
"... The work reported here introduces Defeasible Logic Programming (DeLP), a formalism that combines results of Logic Programming and Defeasible Argumentation. DeLP provides the possibility of representing information in the form of weak rules in a declarative manner, and a defeasible argumentation infe ..."
Abstract - Cited by 233 (57 self) - Add to MetaCart
, i. e. the argument A that supports q is found undefeated by a warrant procedure that implements a dialectical analysis. The defeasible argumentation basis of DeLP allows to build applications that deal with incomplete and contradictory information in dynamic domains. Thus, the resulting approach

An argument for basic emotions

by Paul Ekman - Cognition and Emotion , 1992
"... Ortony and Turner's (1990) arguments against those who adopt the view that there are basic emotions are challenged. The evidence on universals in expression and in physiology strongly sug~ests that ~he~e is a biological basis to the emotions that have been studied. Ortony and Turner's revi ..."
Abstract - Cited by 1022 (6 self) - Add to MetaCart
's reviews of thls hterature are faulted, and their alternative theoretical explanations do not fit the evidence. The utility of the basic emotions approach is also shown in terms of the research it has generated. In their argument against basic emotions. Ortony and Turner (990) distinguished two ways

On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games

by Phan Minh Dung - Artificial Intelligence , 1995
"... The purpose of this paper is to study the fundamental mechanism humans use in argumentation and its role in different major approaches to commonsense reasoning in AI and logic programming. We present three novel results: We develop a theory for argumentation in which the acceptability of arguments i ..."
Abstract - Cited by 1198 (12 self) - Add to MetaCart
The purpose of this paper is to study the fundamental mechanism humans use in argumentation and its role in different major approaches to commonsense reasoning in AI and logic programming. We present three novel results: We develop a theory for argumentation in which the acceptability of arguments

The inductive approach to verifying cryptographic protocols

by Lawrence C. Paulson - Journal of Computer Security , 1998
"... Informal arguments that cryptographic protocols are secure can be made rigorous using inductive definitions. The approach is based on ordinary predicate calculus and copes with infinite-state systems. Proofs are generated using Isabelle/HOL. The human effort required to analyze a protocol can be as ..."
Abstract - Cited by 480 (29 self) - Add to MetaCart
Informal arguments that cryptographic protocols are secure can be made rigorous using inductive definitions. The approach is based on ordinary predicate calculus and copes with infinite-state systems. Proofs are generated using Isabelle/HOL. The human effort required to analyze a protocol can

An Argumentative Approach to Reasoning with Inconsistent Ontologies

by Sergio Alej, Ro Gómez Carlos Iván Chesñevar, Guillermo Ricardo Simari
"... Standard approaches to reasoning with Description Logics (DL) ontologies require them to be consistent. However, as ontologies are complex entities and sometimes built upon other imported ontologies, inconsistencies can arise. In this paper, we present a framework for reasoning with inconsistent DL ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
Standard approaches to reasoning with Description Logics (DL) ontologies require them to be consistent. However, as ontologies are complex entities and sometimes built upon other imported ontologies, inconsistencies can arise. In this paper, we present a framework for reasoning with inconsistent DL

The Proposition Bank: An Annotated Corpus of Semantic Roles

by Martha Palmer, Paul Kingsbury, Daniel Gildea - Computational Linguistics , 2005
"... The Proposition Bank project takes a practical approach to semantic representation, adding a layer of predicate-argument information, or semantic role labels, to the syntactic structures of the Penn Treebank. The resulting resource can be thought of as shallow, in that it does not represent corefere ..."
Abstract - Cited by 556 (22 self) - Add to MetaCart
The Proposition Bank project takes a practical approach to semantic representation, adding a layer of predicate-argument information, or semantic role labels, to the syntactic structures of the Penn Treebank. The resulting resource can be thought of as shallow, in that it does not represent

Graph-based algorithms for Boolean function manipulation

by Randal E. Bryant - IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTERS , 1986
"... In this paper we present a new data structure for representing Boolean functions and an associated set of manipulation algorithms. Functions are represented by directed, acyclic graphs in a manner similar to the representations introduced by Lee [1] and Akers [2], but with further restrictions on th ..."
Abstract - Cited by 3526 (46 self) - Add to MetaCart
on the ordering of decision variables in the graph. Although a function requires, in the worst case, a graph of size exponential in the number of arguments, many of the functions encountered in typical applications have a more reasonable representation. Our algorithms have time complexity proportional

CUTE: A Concolic Unit Testing Engine for C

by Koushik Sen, Darko Marinov, Gul Agha - IN ESEC/FSE-13: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH EUROPEAN , 2005
"... In unit testing, a program is decomposed into units which are collections of functions. A part of unit can be tested by generating inputs for a single entry function. The entry function may contain pointer arguments, in which case the inputs to the unit are memory graphs. The paper addresses the pro ..."
Abstract - Cited by 480 (22 self) - Add to MetaCart
In unit testing, a program is decomposed into units which are collections of functions. A part of unit can be tested by generating inputs for a single entry function. The entry function may contain pointer arguments, in which case the inputs to the unit are memory graphs. The paper addresses

Open Source Content Management Systems: An Argumentative Approach

by Dimitrios Michelinakis , 2004
"... Businesses currently face the daily challenge of managing content efficiently. These businesses are being flooded with information from web Content Man-agement Systems (CMS) that present an all-too-simple picture. Instead, content management systems should solve the problem of turning content into i ..."
Abstract - Cited by 7 (0 self) - Add to MetaCart
Businesses currently face the daily challenge of managing content efficiently. These businesses are being flooded with information from web Content Man-agement Systems (CMS) that present an all-too-simple picture. Instead, content management systems should solve the problem of turning content into information and information into knowledge. Content Management Systems are not just a product or a technology. CMS is defined as a generic term which refers to a wide range of processes that underpin the “next-generation ” of medium to large-scale websites. Content management is a process which deals with the creation, storage, modification, retrieval and display of data or content. This report evaluates seven open source CMS products. The comparison is based on eight categories as seen from a business perspective. These cat-egories are; applications, data repository, deployment, integration, revision control, user interface, user management and workflow. Each category is

Deep disagreements: A meta-argumentation approach

by Maurice Finocchiaro, David M. Godden, Maurice A. Finocchiaro
"... ABSTRACT: This paper examines the views of Fogelin, Woods, Johnstone, etc., concerning deep disa-greements, force-five standoffs, philosophical controversies, etc. My approach is to reconstruct their views and critiques of them as meta-arguments, and to elaborate the meta-argumentative aspects of ra ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
ABSTRACT: This paper examines the views of Fogelin, Woods, Johnstone, etc., concerning deep disa-greements, force-five standoffs, philosophical controversies, etc. My approach is to reconstruct their views and critiques of them as meta-arguments, and to elaborate the meta-argumentative aspects
Next 10 →
Results 1 - 10 of 9,984
Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University