"... In PAGE 4: ... No- tably, within the MTL and even within the left hippocampus, two contrasting patterns of activity were observed. fMRI results: Whole-brain analysis The voxel-wise three-factor ANOVA on the whole-brain data identified 18 regions that showed an interaction among type of phase (Original Event or Misinformation) and type of subsequent memory (true or false) ( Table2 ). These areas were again treated as functionally defined ROIs for analysis of the interaction.... ..."

"... In PAGE 13: ... In the unassociated minus associ- ated contrast, the only area that showed a hint of activation was in the right middle temporal gyrus. However, note that this activation is present only when the cluster threshold is lowered to two contig- uous voxels (see Table2 ), so it would be premature to draw any strong inferences based on this result. One possible reason for the lack of greater activa- tion in the unassociated condition may be due to automatic word association processing, which is common to both conditions.... ..."

"... In PAGE 18: ...s the SPM-HRF was a computational constraint (Friston et al., 2000). The results from the comparison of GCV-spline smoothing with the SPM-HRF and no smoothing of the simulated data show that optimal spline smoothing of each time series is, on average, signi cantly less biased than smoothing all time series with an identical SPM- HRF kernel or ignoring residual autocorrelations. The mean bias reported in Table1 for the SPM-HRF is deceptive in the context of fMRI studies since the majority of voxels with negative bias are located in regions other than grey matter. These negative bias voxels shift the mean bias closer to zero.... ..."

"... In PAGE 10: ...001, a typical value for imaging studies. This volume increased between 5 and 15%, depending on Experiment and contrast ( Table3 ). The increase in activated volume was calculated only within the area of the cerebellum that was covered by both normalization methods.... ..."

"... In PAGE 3: ... To eliminate any motor component in the visual task, the whole brain analysis was based on nontarget trials (see Methods). The contrast between dual task trials with long and short SOA showed focused activity in frontal cortex (Figure 3a, left panel; Table2 ). Foci of frontal activity were located bilaterally in ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC) around the insula and in left middle frontal gyrus (MFG).... In PAGE 3: ....0.4). Accordingly, it is unlikely that our frontal effects are based on higher task switching costs at short SOA, because those would predict a similar impact of SOA on dual task activity in dual task trials with letter targets and nontargets. Resembling the pattern of results in frontal cortex, we further found effects in left middle temporal gyrus (MTG; Figure 3b, left panel; Table2 ). MTG showed reduced activation for dual task trials in which subjects missed the letter target (p,0.... In PAGE 4: ...task trials with short SOA in a) frontal cortex and b) middle temporal gyrus. Details are provided in Table2 . Time courses of activity were extracted for dual task trials with short and long SOA and nontarget letters (dual task_200_nontarget; dual task_800_nontarget), dual task trials with short and long SOA and successfully identified letter targets (dual task_200_hit; dual task_800_hit), single visual trials with nontargets and successfully identified letter targets (single task_vis_nontarget, single task_vis_hit), single auditory trials (single task_aud) and dual task trials with short SOA and letter target misses (dual task_200_miss), in contrast to the null trial activation baseline.... In PAGE 5: ...03, uncorrected; voxel threshold.60) was found in modality-specific visual cortex (see also Table2 ), but not in auditory regions. Time courses show activity for dual task trials with short and long SOA and nontarget letters (dual task_200_nontarget; dual task_800_nontarget), dual task trials with short and long SOA and successfully identified letter targets (dual task_200_hit; dual task_800_hit), single visual trials with nontargets and successfully identified letter targets (single task_vis_nontarget, single task_vis_hit), single auditory trials (single task_aud) and dual task trials with short SOA and letter target misses (dual task_200_miss), in contrast to the null trial activation baseline.... ..."

"... In PAGE 4: ... The number of activated pixels (P H11021 0.00001) in each axial slice, as well as the mean and standard deviation of the BOLD signal changes (in percentage), are summarized in Table1 It can be seen that, for subject 1, the number of activated pixels and the BOLD signal changes detected with the multi-TE fMRI protocol are comparable to that in con- stant-TE protocol. For subject 2, more activated pixels are detected with constant-TE fMRI protocol.... In PAGE 4: ... However, due to the small number of subjects and the interindividual difference in task performance, the comparison between the conventional constant-TE fMRI protocol and the proposed multi-TE protocol (as shown in Fig. 3 and Table1 ) is not sensitive enough to detect more subtle differences between the methods. For brain regions without a pronounced intravoxel field gradient, T2* relaxation times of brain tissue can be esti- mated from the acquired multi-TE data.... ..."

"... In PAGE 11: ... The maps are paneled in Figure S9. The corrected significance values from the corresponding permutation tests are listed in Table4 below. Significant positive correlations were detected only in FraX females.... ..."

"... In PAGE 6: ...MF at a lower threshold; see Fig. 5B). A region in left superior temporal gyrus showed greatest responses to familiar faces at an uncorrected level, but was superior to the right STS region in Figure 5D. Phase 2 Regions showing effects of the various planned comparisons in Phase 2 are shown in Table5 . Several regions showed greater responses to first presentations of familiar than unfamiliar faces (no region showed relatively greater responses to unfamiliar faces).... ..."