• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Tools

Sorted by:
Try your query at:
Semantic Scholar Scholar Academic
Google Bing DBLP
Results 1 - 10 of 100,061
Next 10 →

Table 4. Quality control criteria.

in unknown title
by unknown authors
"... In PAGE 31: ... The analytical laboratories set internal QC limits based on EPA methodology whenever it exists. These limits may be tighter or wider than the criteria listed in Table4 ; therefore, the QC Chemists base their data review and qualification of data on the internal control limits provided by the laboratories. Table 5 lists the corrective action for QC failure.... In PAGE 76: ...QAPP Livermore Site and Site 300 March 1999 Environmental Restoration Projects Table4 . (Continued) Method QC element Frequencya Acceptance criteria 3-99/ERD QAPP:RTD T-5 Matrix spike %R 1 per batch 70-130% Matrix spike duplicate %RPD 1 per batch 25% Laboratory control sample %R 1 per batch 75-125% EPA300 Method blank 1 per batch lt;PQL Matrix spike %R 1 per batch 70-130% Matrix spike duplicate %RPD 1 per batch 25% Laboratory control sample %R 1 per batch 75-125% Notes: PQL =Practical Quantitation Limit (EPA); roughly equivalent to the limit of quantification (LOQ); 10 times the standard deviation.... ..."

Table 13: Conditions for and results of data screening for quality control

in Ris-R-1268(EN) Description of the Rdsand
by Field Measurement Bernhard, Bernhard Lange, Rebecca Barthelmie, Jørgen Højstrup 2001
"... In PAGE 53: ... All conditions for data screening described in chapter 4.2 are summarised in Table13 . Data found erroneous in the data screening procedure were set to the error indicator 999.... ..."

Table 10: Criteria for quality control for the meteorological data base

in Ris-R-1268(EN) Description of the Rdsand
by Field Measurement Bernhard, Bernhard Lange, Rebecca Barthelmie, Jørgen Højstrup 2001

Table 2-3. Field Quality Control Requirements.

in unknown title
by unknown authors
"... In PAGE 14: ...nvironmental Restoration Contractor (ERC) on behalf of PNNL and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). Table2 -1 identifies the project organization. Table 2-1.... In PAGE 14: ... Table 2-1 identifies the project organization. Table2 -1. Project Organization.... In PAGE 15: ...Rev. 0 2-2 Table2 -1. Project Organization.... In PAGE 15: ...1.2 Quality Objectives and Criteria for Measurement Data The detection limits and precision and accuracy requirements for each of the analyses to be performed are summarized in Table2 -2. These requirements were derived as part of Step 6 of the DQO process (see Section 1.... In PAGE 15: ...he DQO process (see Section 1.2.6 of the DQO summary report [BHI 1999]). Table2 -2. Analytical Performance Requirements.... In PAGE 16: ...Rev. 0 2-3 Table2 -2. Analytical Performance Requirements.... In PAGE 17: ...2.4 Analytical Methods Requirements Analytical parameters and methods are listed in Table2 -2. Laboratory-specific standard operating procedures for analytical methods are in place.... In PAGE 18: ... Table2 -4. Laboratory Quality Control Requirements.... In PAGE 19: ...2.11 Sample Preservation, Containers, and Holding Times The sample preservation, container, and holding-time requirements for the analyses to be performed are summarized in Table2 -5. Final laboratory-specific method requirements for sample volumes, sample preservation, and holding times will be identified on the SAF prepared for this project.... In PAGE 19: ... Should conflicting information exist, the SAF requirements will take precedence over the requirements listed in Table 2-5. Table2 -5. Preservatives, Containers, and Holding Times.... In PAGE 20: ...Rev. 0 2-7 Table2 -5. Preservatives, Containers, and Holding Times.... ..."

Table 4-3. In Situ Quality Control Indicators and Limits

in Comparability of Isocs instrument in radionuclide characterization at Brookhaven National Laboratory
by Brookhaven National, Paul Kalb, Larry Luckett, Kevin Miller, Carl Gogolak, Larry Milian, Paul D. Kalb, Larry W. Luckett, Kevin M. Miller, Carl V. Gogolak, Laurence W. Milian
"... In PAGE 7: .................................... 12 Table4 -1. Assessment of Point Source Accuracy .... In PAGE 7: ......................................... 17 Table4 -2. Analytical Accuracy for a Large Area Source .... In PAGE 7: ................................... 18 Table4 -3. In Situ Quality Control Indicators and Limits .... In PAGE 7: .................................... 19 Table4 -4. Analytical Precision in Repeat Sample Analyses by ISOCS .... In PAGE 7: ........................ 21 Table4 -5. ISOCS Minimum Detectable Concentrations for Various Geometries .... In PAGE 7: ................ 21 Table4 -6. Precision in Sample Analysis: ISOCS to Laboratory .... In PAGE 29: ... The results of the analysis are provided in the Table 4-1. As shown in Table4 -1, the ISOCS system measurement is in excellent agreement with the manufacturer-specified source activity. Performance of this benchmark demonstrated the capability to use the ISOCS geometry templates to accurately model a physical exposure geometry and come up with accurate activity determinations.... In PAGE 29: ... This materia l is removed from the sample before laborato ry analysis. The extraneous material adds uncontaminate d mass to the in situ soil that Table4 -1. Assessment of Point Source Accuracy Radio - nuclide Point Source Activity ( FCi) Per cent Difference Manufacturer Specified ISOCS Measured Eu-152 0.... In PAGE 30: ... The un contaminated moisture adds mass to the in situ soil that decreases the reported activity per gram. For the intercomparison study, the soil activity concentration, reported in Table4 -2 above, was adjusted to account for soil moisture at the time of collection in 1997, i.... In PAGE 31: ... To assess ISOCS system stability the spectrum from a nominal 1 microCurie source of Eu-152 is acquired in a fixed geometry each day of operation. The DQIs tracked and the limits on each are identified in the QAPP [ref 8] and are listed in Table4 -3. The energy calibration and detector resolution elements track the electronic stability.... In PAGE 32: ...2 pCi/g), and 15 samples had measurable activity. The original and repeat measurements for the 15 samples are provided in Table4 -4. The results in the table indicate that the ISOCS system is capable of measurements as precise as those performed in a laboratory situation.... In PAGE 33: ...21 November 2000 Table4 -4. Analytical Precision in Repeat Sample Analyses by ISOCS ASTD Analysis ID Measured Activity Concentration (pCi/gram) Relative percent difference Cs-137 Results MDC SAM00181 93.... In PAGE 34: ... The MARSSIM re commends that measurement techniques should be capable of measuring levels below the established clean up goals, and 10-50% of the clean up goal should be the target [ref 13]. The results in the Table4 -5 illustrate that the ISOCS can achieve this target. It should be noted that the MDC values in Table 4-5 are for samples that have no activity detected.... In PAGE 34: ... The results in the Table 4-5 illustrate that the ISOCS can achieve this target. It should be noted that the MDC values in Table4 -5 are for samples that have no activity detected. Due to the in complete interaction in the detector, scattered or partially absorbed high energy gamma rays are detected in the Compton continuum at lower energies, raising the Currie method detection limit for radionuclides with low energy gamma rays.... In PAGE 35: ....2.1.4 Results . Analysis results for Cs-137 in the samples by the ISOCS instrument and the off site laboratory are provided in Table4 -6 . The only contaminant observed was Cs-137.... In PAGE 36: ...24 November 2000 Table4 -6. Precision in Sample Analysis: ISOCS to Laboratory Cs-137 Activity Concentration (pCi/g) Sample No.... ..."

Table 3-2. Field Quality Control Samples.

in unknown title
by unknown authors 2000
"... In PAGE 26: ...Measurement/Data Acquisition Rev. 0 SAI for Disposition of ACM from S/M amp;T Facilities August 2000 3-2 Table3 -1. Sampling Methods and Frequencies.... In PAGE 27: ... When performing this field sampling effort, care shall be taken to prevent the cross- contamination of sampling equipment, sample bottles, and other equipment that could compromise sample integrity. Table3 -2 identifies the field QC sampling requirements for the ACM. Table 3-2.... ..."

Table 1: Data path quality and control overheads for varying multicast group sizes (simulation)

in Scalable Application Layer Multicast
by Suman Banerjee, Bobby Bhattacharjee, Christopher Kommareddy 2002
Cited by 420

Table 6: Topical Coverage of Data Quality Control Concepts in Database Textbooks Kronke Date McFadden amp;

in unknown title
by unknown authors 1998
"... In PAGE 8: ... The text by Silberscharz, Korth, amp; Sudarhan provides the most detailed technical coverage in this area. Table6 shows the analysis of the five database textbooks in terms of data quality control concepts. All of the textbooks give detailed coverage on database security.... ..."
Cited by 1

Table 1: Data path quality and control overheadsfor varying multicast group sizes (simulation)

in Scalable Application Layer Multicast
by Suman Banerjee, Bobby Bhattacharjee, Christopher Kommareddy

Table A3.4 Methods and performance data from quality control for laboratory analyses Method Within -

in unknown title
by unknown authors 2006
Next 10 →
Results 1 - 10 of 100,061
Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2016 The Pennsylvania State University