Searching for "Proving the PCP-Theorem." – sorted by Relevance.
-
A Combinatorial Consistency Lemma with application to proving the PCP Theorem
- A Combinatorial Consistency Lemma with application to proving the PCP Theorem Oded Goldreich
- Cited by 9 (4 self) – Add To MetaCart
-
Lecture 4: NP ⊆ P CP [poly, O(1)]
- for Circuit-SAT will be used in proving the PCP Theorem. Actually, we will prove a slightly stronger result
- Add To MetaCart
-
Two Query PCP with Sub-Constant Error
- reductions. A reduction can be viewed as proving a PCP Theorem in which the type of check corresponds
- Add To MetaCart
-
The PCP theorem by gap amplification
- applicable. 3 1.2 Constraint Graphs and Operations on them Our approach for proving the PCP Theorem (as
- Cited by 53 (4 self) – Add To MetaCart
-
Lecture 6,7,8: Dinur’s Proof of the PCP Theorem Lecturer
- .e., |Σ| ≥ 3). 6,7,8.1 Gap Amplification We observed above, that to prove the PCP Theorem, we essentially
- Add To MetaCart
-
unknown title
- yields the following deep (and important) result: Theorem 2 (The PCP Theorem) N P = PCP(log, O(1)). We
- Add To MetaCart
-
Inapproximability of combinatorial optimization problems
- , Arora et al. [AS98, ALM + 98] proved the PCP Theorem, a very strong characterization of NP in terms
- Cited by 14 (1 self) – Add To MetaCart
-
Special Course on Cryptology / Zero Knowledge: A first look at the PCP(log n,1) = NP theorem
- ]. The lemma 2.4 gives us tools to \prove" the PCP theorem. Namely, we need to assume only two 4 other
- Add To MetaCart
-
The Approximability of NP-hard Problems
- , and Szegedy [10] proved the PCP Theorem (see below) and showed that MAX-SNP-hard problems do not have a PTAS
- Cited by 9 (0 self) – Add To MetaCart
-
Lecture 4: NP ⊆ P CP [poly, O(1)] Lecturer
- for Circuit-SAT will be used in proving the PCP Theorem. Actually, we will prove a slightly stronger result
- Add To MetaCart

