Searching for "KoMeT." – sorted by Relevance.
-
Natural Language Presentation And Combination Of Automatically Generated Proofs
- DISCOUNT 1 [5], SETHEO 2 [9], KoMeT 3 [2] and OTTER 4 [12] cooperate with domain specific provers
- Cited by 14 (0 self) – Add To MetaCart
-
SEdit - Graphically Validating Technical Systems
- by an adaption of Ohlbach/Nonnegart's approach [4] to a first-order logic formula and passed to the KoMeT [1
- Add To MetaCart
-
On the Advantage of a Non-Clausal Davis-Putnam Procedure
- use the Prolog implementation of the previous section 5 and the Davis-Putnam prover of the KoMeT
- Add To MetaCart
-
Lukasiewicz Problems: Experiments Using Program Analysis and Transformation
- of the experiment using KoMeT on a Sun SPARCstation 10 is as follows (using the list of KoMeT options given
- Add To MetaCart
-
From the AAR President, Larry Wos...
- proofs from the provers Discount [2], KoMeT [1], and Setheo [4]. These proofs are converted into block
- Add To MetaCart
-
Dagstuhl Seminar on Deduction
- provers SETHEO and KoMeT are automatically translated into the Block Calculus. A natural language La
- Add To MetaCart
-
Guiding Program Development Systems by a Connection Based Proof Strategy
- . On the other hand, theorem provers like Setheo [9], Otter [20], or KoMeT [2] have demonstrated that formal
- Cited by 20 (14 self) – Add To MetaCart
-
Problem-oriented applications of automated theorem proving
- - KoMeT (Rath) Putnam Uniform extension procedure (Otten) NF proof Inverse logic morphism (Korn) NNF
- Cited by 8 (4 self) – Add To MetaCart
-
' $ % ' $ %
- Intuitionistic Input Transfor- mation process NF proof NF formula NNF proof KoMeT (Rath) output Uniform
- Add To MetaCart
-
Guiding Program Development Systems by a . . .
- ], or KoMeT [2] have demonstrated that formal reasoning in classical predicate logic can be automated
- Add To MetaCart

