Searching for "Evaluation of Interest Point Detectors." – sorted by Relevance.
-
Evaluation of Interest Point Detectors
- Evaluation of Interest Point Detectors Cordelia Schmid, Roger Mohr and Christian Bauckhage INRIA
- Cited by 161 (6 self) – Add To MetaCart
-
Saliency of Interest Points under Scale Changes
- , that is that the image feature is salient for the current application. This article evaluates interest point detectors
- Cited by 11 (0 self) – Add To MetaCart
-
A Performance Evaluation of Local Descriptors
- to compute the descriptors. In this evaluation we have used four interest point detectors : Harris points [8
- Add To MetaCart
-
A performance evaluation of local descriptors
- , several authors have evaluated interest point detectors [14], [30], [33], [39]. The performance is 0162
- Cited by 426 (18 self) – Add To MetaCart
-
Robust Feature Detection of a Service Robot using Multi-view Single Camera in Indoor
- The evaluation of interest point detectors presented in Schmid [15] demonstrate an excellent performance
- Add To MetaCart
-
Target Tracking
- evaluation of interest point detectors, we refer the reader to the survey by Mikolajczyk and Schmid [2003
- Cited by 5 (0 self) – Add To MetaCart
-
Generic object recognition with boosting
- scales (e.g., [22], [26], [27]). Based on the evaluation of interest point detectors by Schmid et al. [31
- Cited by 42 (4 self) – Add To MetaCart
-
A Condition Number for Point Matching with Application to Registration and Post-Registration Error
- parameters. Schmidt et al. [44] present results for the problem of evaluating interest point detectors from
- Cited by 10 (3 self) – Add To MetaCart

