Searching for "Comments on "Note on the Expected Size of a Join"." – sorted by Relevance.
-
On the Estimation of Join Result Sizes
- accurate and consistent estimates of join result sizes. We have invented a new rule for choosing join
- Cited by 13 (0 self) – Add To MetaCart
-
Size Separation Spatial Join
- indexes are not available on them. Size Separation Spatial Join (S 3 J) imposes a hierarchical
- Cited by 54 (2 self) – Add To MetaCart
-
On the Expected Size of Recursive Datalog Queries
- digraphs , the expected answer size is four tuples. Furthermore, a selection-pushing evaluation strategy
- Cited by 2 (0 self) – Add To MetaCart
-
COMMENTS
- COSMlDES JOHN TOOBY University of California at Santa Barbara COMMENTS Roderick Wong The lead article
- Add To MetaCart
-
Tracking Join and Self-Join Sizes in Limited Storage
- , in order to estimate the self-join size to within a 15% relative error; on average, this is over 4 times
- Cited by 70 (0 self) – Add To MetaCart
-
Size bounds and query plans for relational joins
- of joins. In this paper, we address the very fundamental questions of how to estimate the size of a
- Add To MetaCart
-
Fast Joins Using Join Indices
- a temporary file whose size is half that of the join index. Both algorithms require only
- Cited by 11 (2 self) – Add To MetaCart
-
Iterated DFT Based Techniques for Join Size Estimation
- the exact join size using logarithmic space. A generalization to compute the join of arbitrary relations
- Cited by 1 (0 self) – Add To MetaCart
-
Join Indices
- to its size. A tuple in a join index is small. For example, we consider an impure generation
- Cited by 172 (2 self) – Add To MetaCart
-
The expected size of some graphs in computational geometry
- Britain. All rights reserved Copyright © 1988 Pergamon Journals Ltd THE EXPECTED SIZE OF SOME GRAPHS
- Cited by 17 (3 self) – Add To MetaCart

