Searching for "Birds Can Fly." – sorted by Relevance.
-
Confidence as Higher Order Uncertainty
- to new knowledge or further consideration. For example, "Birds can fly" is a statement, then "90% birds
- Cited by 1 (1 self) – Add To MetaCart
-
Applications Of Circumscription To Formalizing Common Sense Knowledge
- involving a bird. If the bird cannot fly, and this is relevant, then A must say so. Whereas if the bird can
- Cited by 411 (8 self) – Add To MetaCart
-
History of circumscription
- involving a bird. If the bird cannot fly, and this is relevant, then A must say so. Whereas if the bird can
- Cited by 9 (0 self) – Add To MetaCart
-
A Connectionist Model of Nonmonotonic Reasoning: Handling Exceptions in Inheritance Hierarchies
- object is normally referred to as a `property', e.g. `fly' in an expression such as `birds can fly
- Cited by 7 (5 self) – Add To MetaCart
-
On the Tweety Penguin Triangle Problem
- probability measure, but rather a belief) to the fact that a penguin-bird can fly. Thus the Pear’ls analysis
- Add To MetaCart
-
Pollock Part I
- all of you will at one time or another have affirmed the proposition that birds can fly. Expressed
- Add To MetaCart
-
Learning Commonsense Categorical Knowledge in a Thread Memory System
- sentences such as “A blue bird flew to the tree” and “The small bird flew to the cage” that birds can fly
- Cited by 1 (0 self) – Add To MetaCart
-
Physical Idealization as Plausible Inference
- fly. Default Rule: 4. Birds can typically fly. Problem Specification: 5. Tweety is either a pelican
- Add To MetaCart
-
Some Expert Systems Need Common Sense
- statement about it. Thus there will be positive statements that birds and airplanes can fly and no statement
- Cited by 21 (2 self) – Add To MetaCart
-
Reasoning by cases in Default Logic
- , in the above example, we may not conclude that the bird Tweety can fly using the rule `birds can fly'. Since we
- Add To MetaCart

