Results 11 - 20 of 133,731

Table 1: Comparison of IBC- and TC-based designs for private messaging

in Towards securing disruption-tolerant networking,” Nokia Research
by N. Asokan, N. Asokan, Kari Kostiainen, Kari Kostiainen, Philip Ginzboorg, Philip Ginzboorg, Jörg Ott, Jörg Ott, Cheng Luo, Cheng Luo
Cited by 1

Table 8. TC Messages under Different Traffic Rates for MPR=1.

in APPENDIX
by Pedro Eduardo Villanueva-pena, Thomas Kunz 2006

Table 1. The history of status, venue, PC chairs, publisher and cooperation.

in A Statistic Study for the ADBIS Period 1994-2006
by Yannis Manolopoulos
"... In PAGE 3: ... Table1 gives a summary of ADBIS conferences in terms of status, venue, PC Co-chairs, type of proceedings and international cooperation. Basically, from this table we observe two rather distinct periods.... In PAGE 9: ... Frequent countries of origin of accepted papers. In Table1 0, we proceed in finer granularity with respect to the countries of the East Europe. Except the top-2 countries, four countries (Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary and Lithuania) show a consistent presence, whereas the remaining countries appear less often.... In PAGE 13: ...Narrowing down into the East European countries, we reach Table1 5, where we remark roughly the same results as in the case of the LNCS proceedings (e.g.... In PAGE 14: ...les along the spirit of Tables 11 and 12, i.e. to evaluate the international collabora- tion in-between countries of East Europe on one hand, and countries of East Europe and the rest of the world on the other hand. From Table 17 we count 15 joint papers in a total of 160 papers, which gives an average 9,4% per year, a figure smaller than the respective figure (12% from Table1 1) calculated for the case of LNCS proceedings. 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 BosErz- Ire Austri- Pol Arm- Rus Austra- UK Ger- Spa Can- Leb Ita- Swi Net-Yug Ire-UK Chi-Ger Fin-Ger Fin- Slove Cze- Slova Chin- UK Rus-Sin Table 17.... In PAGE 14: ...able 18. Distribution of countries in joint papers in local proceedings. When comparing the Tables 11-12 vs. Tables 17-18 and study closer the coun- tries that have joint papers only in LNCS, only in local, and in both kinds of proceed- ings, we come to other interesting outcomes about the competitive qualifications of the communities of these countries (see for example Table1 9). Only in LNCS Belgium, Cyprus, France, Greece, Hungary, India, Israel, Japan, New Zealand, Saudi Arabia, Ukraine, USA Only in local Armenia, Bosnia/Herzegovina, Canada, China, Lebanon, Slovenia, Yugoslavia In both Australia, Austria, Czech, Finland, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Nether- lands, Poland, Russia, Singapore, Slovakia, Spain, Yugoslavia, UK ... In PAGE 17: ...ion. From this table we remark that (a) during the Russian period, e.g. until 1997 inclusively, there is an increasing trend as the ADBIS event was gradually more visi- ble to the global scientific community, (b) along the results of Table1 5, the Prague case corresponds to a local peak, and (b) it seems that during the last three years (2003-2006) more established researchers publish their work in the LNCS proceed- ings. Therefore, it is anticipated that the impact of the papers of these years will be shown in the future.... ..."

Table 9 Percentage Increase in Production, Chair and Training Intervention

in The Productivity Consequences of Two Ergonomic Interventions. Institute for Work and Health Working Paper #286
by Kelly Derango, Ben Amick, Michelle Robertson 2003
"... In PAGE 17: ....23 = 0.25 hours per month. VI. COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS Table9 summarizes our findings and puts them in context. The average amount (not regression adjusted) of individual collections per effective workday in the 11 months prior to the interventions was $1,993.... In PAGE 20: ... The reverse would be true had the health-mediated estimates been larger than the total effects estimates. Second, about a third (from row E in Table9 , 6.... ..."
Cited by 1

Table Chair

in Driver performance using single switch scanning with a powered wheelchair: robotic assisted control versus traditional control
by Holly A. Yanco, James Gips 1998
Cited by 3

Table Chairs

in TalsprŒksfrekvenser. Gothenburg Papers in Theoretical Linguistics
by Ed. Jens Allwood, Jens Allwood 1996
Cited by 2

Table, Chair

in BUILDING A SMART MEETING ROOM: FROM INFRASTRUCTURE TO THE VIDEO GAP (RESEARCH AND OPEN ISSUES)
by unknown authors

Tables and chairs

in 5. Development of public libraries in Latin America: the S&o Paul0 conference
by Mary Peacock Douglas, Place De Fontenoy, I. Edmation For Librarianship

Table Chair

in Infant Behavior Simulation Based on an Environmental Model and a Developmental Behavior Model ∗
by Yoshifumi Nishida, Yoichi Motomura

Table 3: Graph 2: Results for updates after node movements. \changes quot; = number of edges a ected by the movement. TC = time count; MC = message count. WOC = without clustering; WC = with clus- tering.

in Routing in Ad Hoc Networks Using a Spine
by Bevan Das, Raghupathy Sivakumar, Vaduvur Bharghavan 1997
"... In PAGE 5: ...11 00 11 00 11 00 1100 11 00 11 00 11 00 11 00 11 00 11 00 11 00 11 00 11 00 11 00 11 00 11 00 11 00 11 00 11 00 1100 11 00 11 00 11 00 11 00 11 00 11 00 11 00 11 00 11 00 11 00 11 00 11 00 11 00 11 00 11 00 11 00 11 00 11 00 11 00 11 00 11 00 11 00 11 00 11 00 11 00 11 00 11 00 11 00 11 00 11 00 11 00 11 00 11 00 11 00 11 00 11 00 11 00 11 00 11 00 11 00 11 Cluster 1 Cluster 2 Cluster 3 Cluster 4 Virtual Backbone Figure 5: Graph 1 has 58 nodes and four clusters when clustered unclustered graph. The third set of results in Table3 shows how clus- tering a ects the amount of overhead in updating the spine in the 20-node of Figure 6. The reductions from clustering are not as great for this 20-node graph.... ..."
Cited by 80
Results 11 - 20 of 133,731