"... In PAGE 50: ... Then, a full-head view of the pellets and the edges of soft tissue in the midsagittal plane was scanned and recorded, which helped us to con rm the positions of pellets. The placements of the pellets are listed in Table1 . Another useful piece of information is the \ nger trace quot; of the subject apos;s palate.... ..."

"... In PAGE 3: ... Telemetry data was then logged on a 386 DOS laptop. LV0 was launched on June 7, 1998 ( Table1 ). Not sur- prisingly, things went wrong.... In PAGE 4: ... This helped the range safety of- ficer decide if the flight was proceeding as planned: if not, the emergency radio could be used to deploy the re- covery system (parachutes) even if the flight computer failed. LV1 was launched on April 11, 1999 and again (as LV1b) on October 7, 2000 ( Table1 ). Half of the $2,000 development cost came from an IEEE/AT amp;T Student Enterprise grant.... ..."

"... In PAGE 3: ...5-Klb-thrust motor. The characteristics of the small launch vehicle are presented in Table1 . At staging, the booster (LGBB) has a weight of 28,915 lbf (dry weight) and its center of gravity was estimated to be located at 35.... ..."

"... In PAGE 18: ...he network. In this test, the code resides on a Web server in the local network. Therefore, this time represents the minimum load time of our implementation. For each test, Table1 lists the mean operation time with a 99% confidence in- terval. The total time to launch an extension is approximately 1 second (or less... ..."

"... In PAGE 6: ...com launches (and potentially even to the future of eBanking development generally) to make the study itself worth-while. The results of the complete analysis are reported in Table1 , where the selected banks are shown in the first column. The table reports least squares parameter estimates, p values in parenthesis and the last column provides adjusted R2.... ..."

"... In PAGE 6: ...igure 4-1 Advanced Planning Guide .........................................................................................23 Table4 -1 Launch Site Services .... In PAGE 6: ...able 4-1 Launch Site Services ..................................................................................................26 Table4 -2 Utilization Contractor and Government Responsibilities.... In PAGE 6: ...able 4-2 Utilization Contractor and Government Responsibilities.............................................30 Table4 -3 Test Function Responsibilities .... In PAGE 6: ...able 4-3 Test Function Responsibilities ....................................................................................33 Table4 -4 Post-Landing Capabilities .... In PAGE 31: ... The contractor shall obtain government and payload customer approval of additional requirements and real-time requests for additional services prior to implementation. Table4 -1 represents the services typically required to process each class of payload. The contractor shall perform any launch site services listed in Table 4-1 per approved requirements and manifests (Appendix 4).... In PAGE 31: ... Table 4-1 represents the services typically required to process each class of payload. The contractor shall perform any launch site services listed in Table4 -1 per approved requirements and manifests (Appendix 4). ... In PAGE 37: ...Acquisition Title Page No. NAS 10-02007 (ATTACHMENT J-1) CAPPS 30 Table4 -2 Utilization Contractor and Government Responsibilities Function Government Responsibility Contractor Responsibility Approval authority for agreements with Utilization Payload customers Agreement approval N/A Safety and Mission Assurance Per Section 3.0 Per Section 3.... In PAGE 39: ...4.1) The contractor shall perform all testing responsibilities designated by an X in Table4 -3. A description of each test can be found in Appendix 1A, Glossary.... In PAGE 39: ... A description of each test can be found in Appendix 1A, Glossary. Table4 -3 lists the expected testing responsibilities for each type of test. The government will be the task leader for the MEIT, IST, Node System Tests (Reference Appendix 1A), and Utilization tests.... In PAGE 40: ...Acquisition Title Page No. NAS 10-02007 (ATTACHMENT J-1) CAPPS 33 Table4 -3 Test Function Responsibilities Test Leader NASA Payload Custo- mer CAPPS Function Node System Tests, IS T amp; MEIT Utilizati on Testi ng On Orbit Constraints Test CAPPS Managed T e sting Planning Review and comment on test concepts, groundrules, plans and justification X X X X Requirements Review and comment on payload developer and program test requirements X X X Concur with test requirements X Provide traceability from implementing WAD back to the source requirement (Ref.... In PAGE 47: ... The contractor shall staff and implement appropriate sections of the Mission Annex to the Off- Site Operations Plan in the event of an orbiter landing at a Contingency Landing Site (CLS). The contractor shall provide post-landing capability as specified in Table4 -4 unless superseding requirements have been documented in the mission LSSP. The contractor shall apply available resources, in real time, to critical landing activities and prioritized requirements in a best effort situation.... In PAGE 47: ... The contractor shall apply available resources, in real time, to critical landing activities and prioritized requirements in a best effort situation. Table4 -4 Post-Landing Capabilities Condition Notification Capability Nominal EOM (KSC) Planned Full Nominal EOM (SLS) gt; 48 hours Full Nominal EOM (SLS) lt; 48 hours ... ..."

"... In PAGE 9: ...able 24. Minimum cladding/moderator heat exchange coefficient in hot pellet (D4)..................... 29 Table25 .... ..."