Results 11 - 20
of
149
Table 2. Spatial Correlation of Model AOD with TOMS AAI and AODa
"... In PAGE 11: ...reted as the fraction of the spatial variance (i.e., structure) explained by the model. Table2 shows the spatial variance in the TOMS AAI observations explained by each model (r2). The three hypotheses with spatially heterogeneous erodibility factors match the spatial structure of TOMS AAI better than the Uniform erodibility, which performs worst in Africa and Australia (Figures 5d and 5f).... In PAGE 11: ... The best performance in Africa, East Asia, and Australia is achieved by the Topographic, Geomorphic, and Hydrologic erodibil- ity, which explain 47%, 83%, and 49% of the observed spatial structure, respectively (Figures 5g, 5k, and 5o). [48] Figure 5 and Table2 show that different erodibility hypotheses may prevail in different regions. We estimated the range of spatial variability explained by heterogeneous erodibility by subtracting r2 from the Uniform case from the r2 of the heterogeneous hypotheses in each region.... ..."
Cited by 2
Table 8: The e#0Bects of sampling rate on error #28tom-
1994
Cited by 32
Table 2: Simulation times for scanning the human-liver phan- tom.
2000
"... In PAGE 4: ...2. The various simulation times are shown in Table2 . These data also include the beam focus- ing for the synthetic aperture simulation, which took 9 sec- onds in all cases.... ..."
Cited by 1
Table 2. Spatial Correlation of Model AOD with TOMS AAI and AODa
2002
Table 1: Conversion tools to prepare for parsing. See also TOM Conversion Service, http://tom.cs.cmu.edu/.
2000
Cited by 11
Table 1. Credentialsmay have optionalconditionsassociated with the granted rights. Assume the following credentials are stored in the security context associated with the user Tom.
2000
Cited by 30
Table 4. Same as Table 3 but for October 1997 in Figure 11 Latitudes TOMS/MLS-Model RMS r
Cited by 3
Table 5. Same as Table 3 but for February 1997 in Figure 12 Latitudes TOMS/MLS-Model RMS r
Cited by 3
Table 7: Results for asym family. Running time in seconds (top), # of relabel operations (bot- tom).
2006
Cited by 3
Table 3. Average Precision and Recall (Top); Overall Averages for Quadtree Heuristic (Bot- tom)
"... In PAGE 4: ... In the 11-point display, the precision represents the max- imum precision achieved within a given recall range. For example, in the first row of the top part of Table3 , within the range of 0% a157 recall a140 10%, 55.55% was the average per- centage of the maximum precision achieved in this range.... ..."
Cited by 1
Results 11 - 20
of
149